From: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@163.com>
To: "Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com" <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] exfat: support multi-cluster for exfat_map_cluster
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:07:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ad217bd-c21d-49e5-af0a-9059a3bdf911@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PUZPR04MB6316586A2FCEA0BAECA86CB3818EA@PUZPR04MB6316.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 1/13/26 18:26, Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com wrote:
>> On 1/13/26 14:37, Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com wrote:
>>>> @@ -281,7 +285,7 @@ static int exfat_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
>>>> sec_offset = iblock & (sbi->sect_per_clus - 1);
>>>>
>>>> phys = exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, cluster) + sec_offset;
>>>> - mapped_blocks = sbi->sect_per_clus - sec_offset;
>>>> + mapped_blocks = (count << sbi->sect_per_clus_bits) - sec_offset;
>>>
>>> This left shift will cause an overflow if the file is larger than 2TB
>>> and the clusters are contiguous.
>>
>> Thank you for pointing this out, I will change the type to blkcnt_t in
>> v3 to fix this bug.
>
> I don't think it's necessary to change the type to blkcnt_t, because the type
> of bh_result->b_size is size_t (aka unsigned long int).
>
> The overflow was caused by '*count' being increased in exfat_map_cluster().
> I think it should be fixed as below.
>
> --- a/fs/exfat/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/exfat/inode.c
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static int exfat_map_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu_offset,
> last_clu += num_clusters - 1;
> if (clu_offset < num_clusters) {
> *clu += clu_offset;
> - *count = num_clusters - clu_offset;
> + *count = min(num_clusters - clu_offset, *count);
> } else {
> *clu = EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER;
> *count = 0;
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static int exfat_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
> sec_offset = iblock & (sbi->sect_per_clus - 1);
>
> phys = exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, cluster) + sec_offset;
> - mapped_blocks = (count << sbi->sect_per_clus_bits) - sec_offset;
> + mapped_blocks = ((unsigned long)count << sbi->sect_per_clus_bits) - sec_offset;
> max_blocks = min(mapped_blocks, max_blocks);
>
> map_bh(bh_result, sb, phys);
>
Okay, I got it, so the exfat_get_cluster should be updated as well.
diff --git a/fs/exfat/cache.c b/fs/exfat/cache.c
index 18d304d1d4cc..7c8b4182f5de 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/cache.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/cache.c
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ int exfat_get_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned
int cluster,
/* Return if the cache covers the entire range. */
if (cid.fcluster + cid.nr_contig >= end) {
- *count = cid.fcluster + cid.nr_contig - cluster + 1;
+ *count = end - cluster + 1;
return 0;
}
Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-08 7:49 [PATCH v2 00/13] Enable multi-cluster fetching for exfat_get_block Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] exfat: add cache option for __exfat_ent_get Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] exfat: support reuse buffer head for exfat_ent_get Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] exfat: improve exfat_count_num_clusters Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] exfat: improve exfat_find_last_cluster Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] exfat: remove the check for infinite cluster chain loop Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] exfat: remove the unreachable warning for cache miss cases Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] exfat: reduce the number of parameters for exfat_get_cluster() Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] exfat: reuse cache to improve exfat_get_cluster Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] exfat: remove handling of non-file types in exfat_map_cluster Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] exfat: support multi-cluster for exfat_map_cluster Chi Zhiling
2026-01-13 6:37 ` Yuezhang.Mo
2026-01-13 8:53 ` Chi Zhiling
2026-01-13 10:26 ` Yuezhang.Mo
2026-01-14 3:07 ` Chi Zhiling [this message]
2026-01-08 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] exfat: tweak cluster cache to support zero offset Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] exfat: return the start of next cache in exfat_cache_lookup Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] exfat: support multi-cluster for exfat_get_cluster Chi Zhiling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ad217bd-c21d-49e5-af0a-9059a3bdf911@163.com \
--to=chizhiling@163.com \
--cc=Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com \
--cc=chizhiling@kylinos.cn \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®