mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@163.com>
To: "Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com" <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
	Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] exfat: support multi-cluster for exfat_map_cluster
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:07:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ad217bd-c21d-49e5-af0a-9059a3bdf911@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PUZPR04MB6316586A2FCEA0BAECA86CB3818EA@PUZPR04MB6316.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On 1/13/26 18:26, Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com wrote:
>> On 1/13/26 14:37, Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com wrote:
>>>> @@ -281,7 +285,7 @@ static int exfat_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
>>>>          sec_offset = iblock & (sbi->sect_per_clus - 1);
>>>>
>>>>          phys = exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, cluster) + sec_offset;
>>>> -       mapped_blocks = sbi->sect_per_clus - sec_offset;
>>>> +       mapped_blocks = (count << sbi->sect_per_clus_bits) - sec_offset;
>>>
>>> This left shift will cause an overflow if the file is larger than 2TB
>>> and the clusters are contiguous.
>>
>> Thank you for pointing this out, I will change the type to blkcnt_t in
>> v3 to fix this bug.
> 
> I don't think it's necessary to change the type to blkcnt_t, because the type
> of bh_result->b_size is size_t (aka unsigned long int).
> 
> The overflow was caused by '*count' being increased in exfat_map_cluster().
> I think it should be fixed as below.
> 
> --- a/fs/exfat/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/exfat/inode.c
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static int exfat_map_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu_offset,
>                  last_clu += num_clusters - 1;
>                  if (clu_offset < num_clusters) {
>                          *clu += clu_offset;
> -                       *count = num_clusters - clu_offset;
> +                       *count = min(num_clusters - clu_offset, *count);
>                  } else {
>                          *clu = EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER;
>                          *count = 0;
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static int exfat_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
>          sec_offset = iblock & (sbi->sect_per_clus - 1);
>   
>          phys = exfat_cluster_to_sector(sbi, cluster) + sec_offset;
> -       mapped_blocks = (count << sbi->sect_per_clus_bits) - sec_offset;
> +       mapped_blocks = ((unsigned long)count << sbi->sect_per_clus_bits) - sec_offset;
>          max_blocks = min(mapped_blocks, max_blocks);
>   
>          map_bh(bh_result, sb, phys);
> 

Okay, I got it, so the exfat_get_cluster should be updated as well.


diff --git a/fs/exfat/cache.c b/fs/exfat/cache.c
index 18d304d1d4cc..7c8b4182f5de 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/cache.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/cache.c
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ int exfat_get_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned 
int cluster,

         /* Return if the cache covers the entire range. */
         if (cid.fcluster + cid.nr_contig >= end) {
-               *count = cid.fcluster + cid.nr_contig - cluster + 1;
+               *count = end - cluster + 1;
                 return 0;
         }


Thanks,


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-14  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-08  7:49 [PATCH v2 00/13] Enable multi-cluster fetching for exfat_get_block Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] exfat: add cache option for __exfat_ent_get Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] exfat: support reuse buffer head for exfat_ent_get Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:49 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] exfat: improve exfat_count_num_clusters Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:49 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] exfat: improve exfat_find_last_cluster Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:49 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] exfat: remove the check for infinite cluster chain loop Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:49 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] exfat: remove the unreachable warning for cache miss cases Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:49 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] exfat: reduce the number of parameters for exfat_get_cluster() Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:49 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] exfat: reuse cache to improve exfat_get_cluster Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:49 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] exfat: remove handling of non-file types in exfat_map_cluster Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:49 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] exfat: support multi-cluster for exfat_map_cluster Chi Zhiling
2026-01-13  6:37   ` Yuezhang.Mo
2026-01-13  8:53     ` Chi Zhiling
2026-01-13 10:26       ` Yuezhang.Mo
2026-01-14  3:07         ` Chi Zhiling [this message]
2026-01-08  7:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] exfat: tweak cluster cache to support zero offset Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:59   ` [PATCH v2 12/13] exfat: return the start of next cache in exfat_cache_lookup Chi Zhiling
2026-01-08  7:59   ` [PATCH v2 13/13] exfat: support multi-cluster for exfat_get_cluster Chi Zhiling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ad217bd-c21d-49e5-af0a-9059a3bdf911@163.com \
    --to=chizhiling@163.com \
    --cc=Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com \
    --cc=chizhiling@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®