From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, steven.price@arm.com,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com,
tabba@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com,
sdonthineni@nvidia.com, alpergun@google.com,
fj0570is@fujitsu.com, WeiLin.Chang@arm.com,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, enju.kohei@fujitsu.com,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 18/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Introduce Realms
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 13:42:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9bbb3b3c-522f-4deb-9f32-0fcf731dd0bb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005090754.2140522-19-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On 10/5/26 7:07 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>
> Add foundational work for supporting Realms.
> - Add a new VM flavor.
> - At KVM init, check if the KVM can support Realms (though not functional
> yet) and will be advertised by static key kvm_rmi_is_available. This
> will be turned on in a later patches, once we have all the bits and
> pieces ready. For now check if we are blessed with KVM_MODE_RMM.
> - Add realm specific tracking in kvm_arch. Since Realm and protected pKVM
> states are mutually exclusive, move them into a union.
>
> Please note that we cannot create Realm VMs yet. This requires further
> changes to the UABI and core RMI driver support, which will come later.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 16 ++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 19 ++++++---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 6 +++
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c | 18 ++++++++
> 8 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index a3c1928bdf743..d360a8b05b8bf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -793,4 +793,20 @@ static inline void kvm_reset_vcpu_psci(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, reset_state->r0);
> }
>
> +static inline enum realm_state kvm_realm_state(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + return READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.realm.state);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void kvm_set_realm_state(struct kvm *kvm,
> + enum realm_state new_state)
> +{
> + WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.realm.state, new_state);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool kvm_realm_is_created(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + return kvm_vm_is_realm(kvm) && kvm_realm_state(kvm) != REALM_STATE_NONE;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index dfa9d4ec61a76..3debffef638a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
> #include <asm/kvm.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_rmi.h>
> #include <asm/vncr_mapping.h>
>
> #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_INTC_INITIALIZED
> @@ -334,6 +335,7 @@ enum kvm_arm_vm_flavor {
> VM_PKVM, /* Normal guests on pKVM */
> MARKER(__VM_PROTECTED),
> VM_PROTECTED_PKVM, /* Protected VM */
> + VM_REALM, /* CCA */
> VM_FLAVOR_MAX
> };
>
> @@ -450,11 +452,14 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> /* Count the number of VNCR_EL2 TLBs */
> atomic_t vncr_tlb_count;
>
> - /*
> - * For an untrusted host VM, 'pkvm.handle' is used to lookup
> - * the associated pKVM instance in the hypervisor.
> - */
> - struct kvm_protected_vm pkvm;
> + union {
> + /*
> + * For an untrusted host VM, 'pkvm.handle' is used to lookup
> + * the associated pKVM instance in the hypervisor.
> + */
> + struct kvm_protected_vm pkvm;
> + struct realm realm;
> + };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PTDUMP_STAGE2_DEBUGFS
> /* Nested virtualization info */
> @@ -1565,6 +1570,10 @@ struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void);
> (__kvm && kvm_vm_is_protected_pkvm(__kvm)); \
> })
>
> +
> +#define kvm_vm_is_realm(kvm) ((kvm)->arch.vm_flavor == VM_REALM)
> +#define vcpu_is_rec(vcpu) kvm_vm_is_realm((vcpu)->kvm)
> +
vcpu_is_rec() isn't safely called in nVHE hyp stub. So do we need add something
similiar to what we had for vcpu_is_protected(vcpu) in PATCH[05]?
#ifdef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
/* vcpu_is_rec() isn't expected to called in nVHE hyp stub */
#define vcpu_is_rec(vcpu) BUILD_BUG_ON(1)
#else
#define vcpu_is_rec(vcpu) kvm_vm_is_realm((vcpu)->kvm)
#endif
> #define kvm_vm_hyp_is_distrusting(kvm) ((kvm)->arch.vm_flavor >= __VM_DISTRUSTING_HYP)
>
> int kvm_arm_vcpu_finalize(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..44f5c75a27b5b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023-2026 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_KVM_RMI_H
> +#define __ASM_KVM_RMI_H
> +
> +/**
> + * enum realm_state - State of a Realm
> + *
> + * Mirrors the RMM's Realm lifecycle states where they are meaningful to KVM,
> + * with REALM_STATE_DYING being a KVM-internal state used to prevent further
> + * requests while teardown is in progress. KVM does not track REALM_SYSTEM_OFF
> + * or REALM_ZOMBIE separately as they naturally lead to teardown.
> + */
> +enum realm_state {
> + /**
> + * @REALM_STATE_NONE:
> + * Realm has not yet been created. rmi_realm_create() has not
> + * yet been called.
> + */
> + REALM_STATE_NONE,
> + /**
> + * @REALM_STATE_NEW:
> + * Realm is under construction, rmi_realm_create() has been
> + * called, but it is not yet activated. Pages may be populated.
^^^^^
Granule instead of page is the term applicable to RMM. Lets use a generic
term 'memory' here. Also, lets mention the name of the function used to
populate the memory (granules), which is consistent to the comments for
REALM_STATE_ACTIVE.
Memory may be populated by rmi_rtt_data_map_init().
> + */
> + REALM_STATE_NEW,
> + /**
> + * @REALM_STATE_ACTIVE:
> + * Realm has been created and is eligible for execution with
> + * rmi_rec_enter(). Pages may no longer be populated with
> + * rmi_data_create().
> + */
> + REALM_STATE_ACTIVE,
rmi_data_create() is an invalid function name.
Memory can't longer be populated using rmi_rtt_data_map_init().
> + /**
> + * @REALM_STATE_DYING:
> + * Realm is in the process of being destroyed or has already been
> + * destroyed.
> + */
> + REALM_STATE_DYING,
> + /**
> + * @REALM_STATE_DEAD:
> + * Realm has been destroyed.
> + */
> + REALM_STATE_DEAD
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct realm - Additional per VM data for a Realm
> + *
> + * @state: The lifetime state machine for the realm
> + */
> +struct realm {
> + enum realm_state state;
> +};
> +
> +void kvm_init_rmi(void);
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_KVM_RMI_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> index b546703c3ab9a..92cec42952f42 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ void __hyp_reset_vectors(void);
> bool is_kvm_arm_initialised(void);
>
> DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_protected_mode_initialized);
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_rmi_is_available);
>
> static inline bool is_pkvm_initialized(void)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> index 59612d2f277c1..ed3cf30eb06e7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ CFLAGS_handle_exit.o += -Wno-override-init
> kvm-y += arm.o mmu.o mmio.o psci.o hypercalls.o pvtime.o \
> inject_fault.o va_layout.o handle_exit.o config.o \
> guest.o debug.o reset.o sys_regs.o stacktrace.o \
> - vgic-sys-reg-v3.o fpsimd.o pkvm.o \
> + vgic-sys-reg-v3.o fpsimd.o pkvm.o rmi.o \
> arch_timer.o trng.o vmid.o emulate-nested.o nested.o at.o \
> vgic/vgic.o vgic/vgic-init.o \
> vgic/vgic-irqfd.o vgic/vgic-v2.o \
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 294cea4cc8271..37ef2ba4e43e2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_nested.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_pkvm.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_ptrauth.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_rmi.h>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
> #include <asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h>
>
> @@ -112,6 +113,8 @@ long kvm_get_cap_for_kvm_ioctl(unsigned int ioctl, long *ext)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_rmi_is_available);
> +
> DECLARE_KVM_HYP_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_hyp_vector);
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_arm_hyp_stack_base);
> @@ -2239,6 +2242,7 @@ static const struct kvm_vcpu_ops *arm64_vcpu_ops[] = {
> KVM_VCPU_OPS(VM_VHE, vhe_vcpu_ops),
> KVM_VCPU_OPS(VM_PKVM, pkvm_vcpu_ops),
> KVM_VCPU_OPS(VM_PROTECTED_PKVM, pkvm_vcpu_ops),
> + KVM_VCPU_OPS(VM_REALM, realm_vcpu_ops),
> };
>
> static void kvm_init_vcpu_ops(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -3192,6 +3196,8 @@ static __init int kvm_arm_init(void)
>
> in_hyp_mode = is_kernel_in_hyp_mode();
>
> + kvm_init_rmi();
> +
> if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_DEVICE_LOAD_ACQUIRE) ||
> cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_1508412))
> kvm_info("Guests without required CPU erratum workarounds can deadlock system!\n" \
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 58bc6a85f48b4..697f1ba6667a9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2927,6 +2927,7 @@ static const struct kvm_vm_s2_ops *arm64_vm_s2_ops[] = {
> KVM_VM_S2_OPS(VM_NVHE, kvm_default_vm_s2_ops),
> KVM_VM_S2_OPS(VM_PKVM, pkvm_vm_s2_ops),
> KVM_VM_S2_OPS(VM_PROTECTED_PKVM, protected_pkvm_vm_s2_ops),
> + KVM_VM_S2_OPS(VM_REALM, realm_vm_s2_ops),
> };
>
> static int kvm_vm_init_vm_s2_ops(struct kvm *kvm)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..5ecc8b3498698
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023-2026 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/virt.h>
> +
> +void kvm_init_rmi(void)
> +{
> + if (kvm_get_mode() != KVM_MODE_RMM)
> + return;
> +
> + /* TODO: Check if the RMI is available */
> +
> + /* Future patch will enable static branch kvm_rmi_is_available */
> +}
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 9:07 [PATCH v22 00/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add basic plumbing for Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 01/23] KVM: arm64: protected VM: Handle user writes to CNTVCT_EL0/CNTPCT_EL0 Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 0:02 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 02/23] KVM: arm64: Disable Steal time accounting for protected guests Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 0:03 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 03/23] KVM: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 04/23] KVM: arm64: Avoid including linux/kvm_host.h in kvm_pgtable.h Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 05/23] KVM: arm64: Track the type of VM in kvm_arch Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 3:55 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06 8:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-10-06 8:49 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 06/23] KVM: arm64: Don't call vcpu_set_pauth_traps for pKVM host Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 0:29 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 07/23] KVM: arm64: Refactor the vcpu_load to allow for VM specific callbacks Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 08/23] KVM: arm64: Add vcpu load/put call backs for flavors Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 2:15 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 09/23] KVM: arm64: Prevent unsupported vcpu features for VM types Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 2:24 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06 2:25 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06 5:16 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 8:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 10/23] KVM: arm64: Consolidate stage2 unmap range into kvm_stage2_unmap_range Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 2:37 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 11/23] KVM: arm64: Add VM specific callback for S2 MMU operations Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 3:00 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06 5:22 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 9:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-10-06 10:36 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 12/23] KVM: arm64: Use a local kvm pointer in kvm_handle_guest_abort() Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 3:02 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 13/23] KVM: arm64: Abstract out memory abort handling Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 3:07 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06 5:25 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 14/23] KVM: arm64: Mandate VGIC v3 for pKVM VMs and Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 3:10 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 15/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add a new mode for supporting Realm guests Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 3:11 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 16/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add VCPU load/put for Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 3:16 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06 5:09 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 17/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add bare minimal S2 operations for Realm Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 3:18 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 18/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Introduce Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 3:42 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2026-10-06 5:10 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 19/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Don't expose unsupported capabilities for realm guests Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 4:58 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 20/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: WARN on injected undef exceptions Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 3:49 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 21/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Support timers in realm RECs Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 5:44 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 22/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Expose SVE VL register before VCPU finalization Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 5:35 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06 5:57 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05 9:07 ` [PATCH v22 23/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Control user register access for Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 5:47 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06 6:01 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06 6:16 ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06 6:23 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9bbb3b3c-522f-4deb-9f32-0fcf731dd0bb@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=enju.kohei@fujitsu.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®