mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, steven.price@arm.com,
	aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	tabba@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com,
	sdonthineni@nvidia.com, alpergun@google.com,
	fj0570is@fujitsu.com, WeiLin.Chang@arm.com,
	lpieralisi@kernel.org, enju.kohei@fujitsu.com,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 11/23] KVM: arm64: Add VM specific callback for S2 MMU operations
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 07:22:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3cdfb9f-42b2-452e-a49c-32abe8e6f839@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6de5d5c-e7e5-4e24-abd6-bdea9bcf8db6@redhat.com>

On 06/10/2026 04:00, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On 10/5/26 7:07 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> Add VM type specific S2 MMU operation backends which can be 
>> initialized per
>> VM flavor, to keep the handling cleaner.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Change since v21:
>>   - Define all vm_s2_ops call back. All calls are mandatory.
>>   - Define callback for each flavor, disjointing the non-protetcted 
>> pKVM and
>>     normal KVM (VHE & nVHE) and remove the KVM_PGT_FN() hacks.
>>   - Dropped Reviews due to the changes.
>>   - Add "no_age_gfn" and "no_stage2_unmap_range" for pKVM callbacks, 
>> no_age_*
>>     to be also reused by Realms later.
>>   - Move kvm_vm_s2_ops field to keep the structure packed

...

>>    */
>>   int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
>>   {
>> -    if (is_protected_kvm_enabled())
>> -        kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_tlb_flush_vmid, kvm->arch.pkvm.handle);
>> -    else
>> -        kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, &kvm->arch.mmu);
>> -    return 0;
>> +    return kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>>   }
>> -int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>> -                      gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
>> +static int pkvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>> +                    gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
>> +{
>> +    return pkvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> 
> No need to have another function call, which causes unnecessary overhead?
> 
>      kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_tlb_flush_vmid, kvm->arch.pkvm.handle);

Maybe, but that is in another way, telling the reader that pKVM can only
do full VM TLB flush, no range TLB flush.

>      return 0;
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int kvm_vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>> +                     gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
>>   {
>>       u64 size = nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>       u64 addr = gfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> -    if (is_protected_kvm_enabled())
>> -        kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_tlb_flush_vmid, kvm->arch.pkvm.handle);
>> -    else
>> -        kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, addr, size);
>> +    kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, addr, size);
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>
> 
> Since we're here, the local variable 'addr' and 'size' can be dropped by:
> 
>      kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(&kvm->arch.mmu,
>                                   gfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
>                                   nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
> 

Does it really matter, the compiler can optimise this anyways and looks
more readable ?

> 
>> +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>> +                     gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
>> +{
>> +    return kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(kvm, gfn, 
>> nr_pages);
>> +}
>> +

...

>> +static const struct kvm_vm_s2_ops kvm_default_vm_s2_ops = {
>> +    .vm_flush_remote_tlbs        = kvm_vm_flush_remote_tlbs,
>> +    .vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range    = kvm_vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range,
>> +    .vm_age_gfn            = kvm_vm_age_gfn,
>> +    .vm_test_age_gfn        = kvm_vm_test_age_gfn,
>> +    .vm_stage2_unmap_range        = kvm_vm_stage2_unmap_range,
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define KVM_VM_S2_OPS(flavor, ops)        \
>> +        [flavor] = &(ops)
> 
> s/[flavor]/[(flavor)]

Ack


Thanks !
Suzuki

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-06  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-05  9:07 [PATCH v22 00/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add basic plumbing for Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 01/23] KVM: arm64: protected VM: Handle user writes to CNTVCT_EL0/CNTPCT_EL0 Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  0:02   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 02/23] KVM: arm64: Disable Steal time accounting for protected guests Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  0:03   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 03/23] KVM: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 04/23] KVM: arm64: Avoid including linux/kvm_host.h in kvm_pgtable.h Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 05/23] KVM: arm64: Track the type of VM in kvm_arch Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  3:55   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06  8:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-10-06  8:49     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 06/23] KVM: arm64: Don't call vcpu_set_pauth_traps for pKVM host Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  0:29   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 07/23] KVM: arm64: Refactor the vcpu_load to allow for VM specific callbacks Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 08/23] KVM: arm64: Add vcpu load/put call backs for flavors Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  2:15   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 09/23] KVM: arm64: Prevent unsupported vcpu features for VM types Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  2:24   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06  2:25   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06  5:16     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  8:50   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 10/23] KVM: arm64: Consolidate stage2 unmap range into kvm_stage2_unmap_range Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  2:37   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 11/23] KVM: arm64: Add VM specific callback for S2 MMU operations Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  3:00   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06  5:22     ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2026-10-06  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-10-06 10:36     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 12/23] KVM: arm64: Use a local kvm pointer in kvm_handle_guest_abort() Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  3:02   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 13/23] KVM: arm64: Abstract out memory abort handling Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  3:07   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06  5:25     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 14/23] KVM: arm64: Mandate VGIC v3 for pKVM VMs and Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  3:10   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 15/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add a new mode for supporting Realm guests Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  3:11   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 16/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add VCPU load/put for Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  3:16   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06  5:09     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 17/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add bare minimal S2 operations for Realm Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  3:18   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 18/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Introduce Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  3:42   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06  5:10     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 19/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Don't expose unsupported capabilities for realm guests Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  4:58   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 20/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: WARN on injected undef exceptions Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  3:49   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 21/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Support timers in realm RECs Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  5:44   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 22/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Expose SVE VL register before VCPU finalization Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  5:35   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06  5:57     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-05  9:07 ` [PATCH v22 23/23] KVM: arm64: CCA: Control user register access for Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  5:47   ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06  6:01     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-06  6:16       ` Gavin Shan
2026-10-06  6:23       ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c3cdfb9f-42b2-452e-a49c-32abe8e6f839@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
    --cc=alpergun@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=enju.kohei@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®