From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 03/11] iommu/sva: Add iommu_domain type for SVA
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 14:09:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cac5d3b-3343-9e39-fe7b-3914d6b41a69@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220402233210.GM2120790@nvidia.com>
Hi Jason and Kevin,
On 2022/4/3 7:32, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 08:43:16AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>
>>> This assumes any domain is interchangeable with any device, which is
>>> not the iommu model. We need a domain op to check if a device is
>>> compatiable with the domain for vfio an iommufd, this should do the
>>> same.
>>
>> This suggests that mm_struct needs to include the format information
>> of the CPU page table so the format can be checked by the domain op?
>
> No, Linux does not support multiple formats for CPU page tables,
> AFAICT, and creating the SVA domain in the first place should check
> this.
>
>>> It means each mm can have a list of domains associated with it and a
>>> new domain is auto-created if the device doesn't work with any of the
>>> existing domains.
>>
>> mm has only one page table and one format. If a device is incompatible
>> with an existing domain wrapping that page table, how come creating
>> another domain could make it compatible?
>
> Because domains wrap more than just the IOPTE format, they have
> additional data related to the IOMMU HW block itself. Imagine a SOC
> with two IOMMU HW blocks that can both process the CPU IOPTE format,
> but have different configuration.
>
> So if device A users IOMMU A it needs an iommu_domain from driver A and
> same for another device B, even if both iommu_domains are thin
> wrappers around the same mm_struct.
How about below data structure design?
- [New]struct iommu_sva_ioas
Represent the I/O address space shared with an application CPU address
space. This structure has a 1:1 relationship with an mm_struct. It
graps a "mm->mm_count" refcount during creation and drop it on release.
struct iommu_sva_ioas {
struct mm_struct *mm;
ioasid_t pasid;
/* Counter of domains attached to this ioas. */
refcount_t users;
/* All bindings are linked here. */
struct list_head bonds;
};
- [Enhance existing] struct iommu_domain (IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA type)
Represent a hardware pagetable that the IOMMU hardware could use for
SVA translation. Multiple iommu domains could be bound with an SVA ioas
and each graps a refcount from ioas in order to make sure ioas could
only be freed after all domains have been unbound.
@@ -95,6 +101,7 @@ struct iommu_domain {
void *handler_token;
struct iommu_domain_geometry geometry;
struct iommu_dma_cookie *iova_cookie;
+ struct iommu_sva_ioas *sva_ioas;
};
- [Enhance existing] struct iommu_sva
Represent a bond relationship between an SVA ioas and an iommu domain.
If a bond already exists, it's reused and a reference is taken.
/**
* struct iommu_sva - handle to a device-mm bond
*/
struct iommu_sva {
struct device *dev;
struct iommu_sva_ioas *sva_ioas;
struct iommu_domain *domain;
/* Link to sva ioas's bonds list */
struct list_head node;
refcount_t users;
};
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-04 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-29 5:37 [PATCH RFC v2 00/11] iommu: SVA and IOPF refactoring Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 5:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/11] iommu: Add pasid_bits field in struct dev_iommu Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 21:00 ` Jacob Pan
2022-03-30 4:30 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-30 7:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-30 11:58 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 5:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/11] iommu: Add iommu_group_singleton_lockdown() Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 8:42 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-29 11:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-30 6:50 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-30 11:57 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-30 11:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-30 14:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-30 14:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-02 7:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-02 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 10:02 ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-06 10:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-06 11:03 ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-06 23:56 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-30 14:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-30 15:04 ` Alex Williamson
2022-04-04 5:43 ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-04 17:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 6:12 ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-05 14:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 9:51 ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-01 6:20 ` Yi Liu
2022-04-01 11:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-30 4:59 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-30 6:55 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-01 5:49 ` Yi Liu
2022-03-29 5:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/11] iommu/sva: Add iommu_domain type for SVA Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 21:38 ` Jacob Pan
2022-03-30 4:35 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-30 19:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-02 8:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-02 23:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-04 6:09 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2022-04-06 1:00 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-06 1:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 5:58 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-06 12:32 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-06 13:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 13:37 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-06 14:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 0:11 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-29 5:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/11] iommu: Add attach/detach_dev_pasid domain ops Lu Baolu
2022-03-30 19:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-04 6:47 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 5:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/11] iommu/vt-d: Remove SVM_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE suport Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 5:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/11] iommu/vt-d: Add SVA domain support Lu Baolu
2022-03-30 19:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-04 6:52 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 5:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/11] arm-smmu-v3/sva: " Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 5:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/11] iommu/sva: Use attach/detach_pasid_dev in SVA interfaces Lu Baolu
2022-03-31 20:59 ` Jacob Pan
2022-03-31 22:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-04 5:55 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 5:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/11] iommu: Remove SVA related callbacks from iommu ops Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 5:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/11] iommu: Per-domain I/O page fault handling Lu Baolu
2022-03-29 5:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/11] iommu: Rename iommu-sva-lib.{c,h} Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9cac5d3b-3343-9e39-fe7b-3914d6b41a69@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®