mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations
@ 2026-10-09 10:18 Henry Martin
  2026-10-09 15:00 ` Kuehling, Felix
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Henry Martin @ 2026-10-09 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Felix Kuehling, Alex Deucher, Christian König, David Airlie,
	Simona Vetter, Harry Wentland, Alex Hung
  Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Henry Martin

The check-and-allocate sequence on pdd->qpd.proc_doorbells is
lockless at every call site of kfd_alloc_process_doorbells():
kfd_get_process_doorbells() (mmap of /dev/kfd), kfd_ioctl_create_queue()
and the CRIU restore path each test the pointer under different
locking (or none), so two racing threads can both observe NULL and
each allocate a doorbell BO and bitmap, orphaning one allocation and
handing the two mappings different backing pages.

Move the serialization into kfd_alloc_process_doorbells() itself:
take kfd->doorbell_mutex and re-check under it, so all three call
sites are covered regardless of their own locking.  The existing
doorbell_mutex users (kfd_get_kernel_doorbell() /
kfd_release_kernel_doorbell()) only guard the device-global
kfd->doorbell_bitmap in short non-sleeping sections and never call
into this path, so there is no nesting.

This vulnerability was discovered by Tencent CodeBuddy Security.

Fixes: 428542d91772 ("drm/amd/display: Setup for mmhubbub3_warmup_mcif with big buffer")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
index fdcf7f2d1b5b4..07f881573837e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
@@ -257,12 +257,21 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
 	int r;
 	struct qcm_process_device *qpd = &pdd->qpd;

+	mutex_lock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
+
+	/* Another thread may have won the check-and-allocate race */
+	if (qpd->proc_doorbells) {
+		mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	/* Allocate bitmap for dynamic doorbell allocation */
 	qpd->doorbell_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(KFD_MAX_NUM_OF_QUEUES_PER_PROCESS,
 					     GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!qpd->doorbell_bitmap) {
 		DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbell bitmap\n");
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		r = -ENOMEM;
+		goto unlock;
 	}

 	r = init_doorbell_bitmap(&pdd->qpd, kfd);
@@ -284,11 +293,15 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
 		DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbells\n");
 		goto err;
 	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
 	return 0;

 err:
 	bitmap_free(qpd->doorbell_bitmap);
 	qpd->doorbell_bitmap = NULL;
+unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
 	return r;
 }

--
2.43.7

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations
  2026-10-09 10:18 [PATCH] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations Henry Martin
@ 2026-10-09 15:00 ` Kuehling, Felix
  2026-10-09 15:33   ` Kuehling, Felix
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kuehling, Felix @ 2026-10-09 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Henry Martin, Alex Deucher, Christian König, David Airlie,
	Simona Vetter, Harry Wentland, Alex Hung
  Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel

On 2026-10-09 06:18, Henry Martin wrote:
> The check-and-allocate sequence on pdd->qpd.proc_doorbells is
> lockless at every call site of kfd_alloc_process_doorbells():
> kfd_get_process_doorbells() (mmap of /dev/kfd), kfd_ioctl_create_queue()
> and the CRIU restore path each test the pointer under different
> locking (or none), so two racing threads can both observe NULL and
> each allocate a doorbell BO and bitmap, orphaning one allocation and
> handing the two mappings different backing pages.
>
> Move the serialization into kfd_alloc_process_doorbells() itself:
> take kfd->doorbell_mutex and re-check under it, so all three call
> sites are covered regardless of their own locking.  The existing
> doorbell_mutex users (kfd_get_kernel_doorbell() /
> kfd_release_kernel_doorbell()) only guard the device-global
> kfd->doorbell_bitmap in short non-sleeping sections and never call
> into this path, so there is no nesting.
>
> This vulnerability was discovered by Tencent CodeBuddy Security.
>
> Fixes: 428542d91772 ("drm/amd/display: Setup for mmhubbub3_warmup_mcif with big buffer")
> Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>

I'm applying the patch to amd-staging-drm-next.

Thanks,
   Felix


> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
> index fdcf7f2d1b5b4..07f881573837e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
> @@ -257,12 +257,21 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
>   	int r;
>   	struct qcm_process_device *qpd = &pdd->qpd;
>
> +	mutex_lock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
> +
> +	/* Another thread may have won the check-and-allocate race */
> +	if (qpd->proc_doorbells) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>   	/* Allocate bitmap for dynamic doorbell allocation */
>   	qpd->doorbell_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(KFD_MAX_NUM_OF_QUEUES_PER_PROCESS,
>   					     GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!qpd->doorbell_bitmap) {
>   		DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbell bitmap\n");
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +		r = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto unlock;
>   	}
>
>   	r = init_doorbell_bitmap(&pdd->qpd, kfd);
> @@ -284,11 +293,15 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
>   		DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbells\n");
>   		goto err;
>   	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
>   	return 0;
>
>   err:
>   	bitmap_free(qpd->doorbell_bitmap);
>   	qpd->doorbell_bitmap = NULL;
> +unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
>   	return r;
>   }
>
> --
> 2.43.7

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations
  2026-10-09 15:00 ` Kuehling, Felix
@ 2026-10-09 15:33   ` Kuehling, Felix
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kuehling, Felix @ 2026-10-09 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Henry Martin, Alex Deucher, Christian König, David Airlie,
	Simona Vetter, Harry Wentland, Alex Hung
  Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel

On 2026-10-09 11:00, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> On 2026-10-09 06:18, Henry Martin wrote:
>> The check-and-allocate sequence on pdd->qpd.proc_doorbells is
>> lockless at every call site of kfd_alloc_process_doorbells():
>> kfd_get_process_doorbells() (mmap of /dev/kfd), kfd_ioctl_create_queue()
>> and the CRIU restore path each test the pointer under different
>> locking (or none), so two racing threads can both observe NULL and
>> each allocate a doorbell BO and bitmap, orphaning one allocation and
>> handing the two mappings different backing pages.
>>
>> Move the serialization into kfd_alloc_process_doorbells() itself:
>> take kfd->doorbell_mutex and re-check under it, so all three call
>> sites are covered regardless of their own locking.  The existing
>> doorbell_mutex users (kfd_get_kernel_doorbell() /
>> kfd_release_kernel_doorbell()) only guard the device-global
>> kfd->doorbell_bitmap in short non-sleeping sections and never call
>> into this path, so there is no nesting.
>>
>> This vulnerability was discovered by Tencent CodeBuddy Security.
>>
>> Fixes: 428542d91772 ("drm/amd/display: Setup for 
>> mmhubbub3_warmup_mcif with big buffer")
>> Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
>
> I'm applying the patch to amd-staging-drm-next.

An automatic Claude review pointed out two problems with the patch. I 
agree with both:

The Fixes: tag points at an unrelated drm/amd/display commit 
(428542d91772). It must be corrected — 2105a15a2046 ("drm/amdgpu: use 
doorbell mgr for kfd process doorbells") is the commit that introduced 
the allocation being fixed.

The patch holds the device-global kfd->doorbell_mutex across 
bitmap_zalloc(GFP_KERNEL) and amdgpu_bo_create_kernel(), while that same 
mutex is already acquired under dqm_lock via start_cpsch -> pm_init -> 
kq_initialize -> kfd_get_kernel_doorbell(). That is a plausible ABBA 
inversion once reclaim/TTM eviction runs the KFD eviction fence back 
into dqm_lock. Please either post lockdep (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) results 
for a boot + queue-create cycle, or switch to a per-process-device lock, 
which also avoids serialising unrelated processes behind a device-wide 
mutex for per-process state.

Regards,
   Felix


>
> Thanks,
>   Felix
>
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
>> index fdcf7f2d1b5b4..07f881573837e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
>> @@ -257,12 +257,21 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev 
>> *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
>>       int r;
>>       struct qcm_process_device *qpd = &pdd->qpd;
>>
>> +    mutex_lock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
>> +
>> +    /* Another thread may have won the check-and-allocate race */
>> +    if (qpd->proc_doorbells) {
>> +        mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
>> +        return 0;
>> +    }
>> +
>>       /* Allocate bitmap for dynamic doorbell allocation */
>>       qpd->doorbell_bitmap = 
>> bitmap_zalloc(KFD_MAX_NUM_OF_QUEUES_PER_PROCESS,
>>                            GFP_KERNEL);
>>       if (!qpd->doorbell_bitmap) {
>>           DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbell bitmap\n");
>> -        return -ENOMEM;
>> +        r = -ENOMEM;
>> +        goto unlock;
>>       }
>>
>>       r = init_doorbell_bitmap(&pdd->qpd, kfd);
>> @@ -284,11 +293,15 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev 
>> *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
>>           DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbells\n");
>>           goto err;
>>       }
>> +
>> +    mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
>>       return 0;
>>
>>   err:
>>       bitmap_free(qpd->doorbell_bitmap);
>>       qpd->doorbell_bitmap = NULL;
>> +unlock:
>> +    mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
>>       return r;
>>   }
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.43.7

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-09 15:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-09 10:18 [PATCH] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations Henry Martin
2026-10-09 15:00 ` Kuehling, Felix
2026-10-09 15:33   ` Kuehling, Felix

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®