* [PATCH] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations
@ 2026-10-09 10:18 Henry Martin
2026-10-09 15:00 ` Kuehling, Felix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Henry Martin @ 2026-10-09 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix Kuehling, Alex Deucher, Christian König, David Airlie,
Simona Vetter, Harry Wentland, Alex Hung
Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Henry Martin
The check-and-allocate sequence on pdd->qpd.proc_doorbells is
lockless at every call site of kfd_alloc_process_doorbells():
kfd_get_process_doorbells() (mmap of /dev/kfd), kfd_ioctl_create_queue()
and the CRIU restore path each test the pointer under different
locking (or none), so two racing threads can both observe NULL and
each allocate a doorbell BO and bitmap, orphaning one allocation and
handing the two mappings different backing pages.
Move the serialization into kfd_alloc_process_doorbells() itself:
take kfd->doorbell_mutex and re-check under it, so all three call
sites are covered regardless of their own locking. The existing
doorbell_mutex users (kfd_get_kernel_doorbell() /
kfd_release_kernel_doorbell()) only guard the device-global
kfd->doorbell_bitmap in short non-sleeping sections and never call
into this path, so there is no nesting.
This vulnerability was discovered by Tencent CodeBuddy Security.
Fixes: 428542d91772 ("drm/amd/display: Setup for mmhubbub3_warmup_mcif with big buffer")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
index fdcf7f2d1b5b4..07f881573837e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
@@ -257,12 +257,21 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
int r;
struct qcm_process_device *qpd = &pdd->qpd;
+ mutex_lock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
+
+ /* Another thread may have won the check-and-allocate race */
+ if (qpd->proc_doorbells) {
+ mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/* Allocate bitmap for dynamic doorbell allocation */
qpd->doorbell_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(KFD_MAX_NUM_OF_QUEUES_PER_PROCESS,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!qpd->doorbell_bitmap) {
DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbell bitmap\n");
- return -ENOMEM;
+ r = -ENOMEM;
+ goto unlock;
}
r = init_doorbell_bitmap(&pdd->qpd, kfd);
@@ -284,11 +293,15 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbells\n");
goto err;
}
+
+ mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
return 0;
err:
bitmap_free(qpd->doorbell_bitmap);
qpd->doorbell_bitmap = NULL;
+unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
return r;
}
--
2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations
2026-10-09 10:18 [PATCH] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations Henry Martin
@ 2026-10-09 15:00 ` Kuehling, Felix
2026-10-09 15:33 ` Kuehling, Felix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kuehling, Felix @ 2026-10-09 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Henry Martin, Alex Deucher, Christian König, David Airlie,
Simona Vetter, Harry Wentland, Alex Hung
Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel
On 2026-10-09 06:18, Henry Martin wrote:
> The check-and-allocate sequence on pdd->qpd.proc_doorbells is
> lockless at every call site of kfd_alloc_process_doorbells():
> kfd_get_process_doorbells() (mmap of /dev/kfd), kfd_ioctl_create_queue()
> and the CRIU restore path each test the pointer under different
> locking (or none), so two racing threads can both observe NULL and
> each allocate a doorbell BO and bitmap, orphaning one allocation and
> handing the two mappings different backing pages.
>
> Move the serialization into kfd_alloc_process_doorbells() itself:
> take kfd->doorbell_mutex and re-check under it, so all three call
> sites are covered regardless of their own locking. The existing
> doorbell_mutex users (kfd_get_kernel_doorbell() /
> kfd_release_kernel_doorbell()) only guard the device-global
> kfd->doorbell_bitmap in short non-sleeping sections and never call
> into this path, so there is no nesting.
>
> This vulnerability was discovered by Tencent CodeBuddy Security.
>
> Fixes: 428542d91772 ("drm/amd/display: Setup for mmhubbub3_warmup_mcif with big buffer")
> Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
I'm applying the patch to amd-staging-drm-next.
Thanks,
Felix
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
> index fdcf7f2d1b5b4..07f881573837e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
> @@ -257,12 +257,21 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
> int r;
> struct qcm_process_device *qpd = &pdd->qpd;
>
> + mutex_lock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
> +
> + /* Another thread may have won the check-and-allocate race */
> + if (qpd->proc_doorbells) {
> + mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> /* Allocate bitmap for dynamic doorbell allocation */
> qpd->doorbell_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(KFD_MAX_NUM_OF_QUEUES_PER_PROCESS,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!qpd->doorbell_bitmap) {
> DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbell bitmap\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + r = -ENOMEM;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> r = init_doorbell_bitmap(&pdd->qpd, kfd);
> @@ -284,11 +293,15 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
> DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbells\n");
> goto err;
> }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
> return 0;
>
> err:
> bitmap_free(qpd->doorbell_bitmap);
> qpd->doorbell_bitmap = NULL;
> +unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
> return r;
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations
2026-10-09 15:00 ` Kuehling, Felix
@ 2026-10-09 15:33 ` Kuehling, Felix
2026-10-10 2:55 ` henry martin
2026-10-10 3:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Henry Martin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kuehling, Felix @ 2026-10-09 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Henry Martin, Alex Deucher, Christian König, David Airlie,
Simona Vetter, Harry Wentland, Alex Hung
Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel
On 2026-10-09 11:00, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> On 2026-10-09 06:18, Henry Martin wrote:
>> The check-and-allocate sequence on pdd->qpd.proc_doorbells is
>> lockless at every call site of kfd_alloc_process_doorbells():
>> kfd_get_process_doorbells() (mmap of /dev/kfd), kfd_ioctl_create_queue()
>> and the CRIU restore path each test the pointer under different
>> locking (or none), so two racing threads can both observe NULL and
>> each allocate a doorbell BO and bitmap, orphaning one allocation and
>> handing the two mappings different backing pages.
>>
>> Move the serialization into kfd_alloc_process_doorbells() itself:
>> take kfd->doorbell_mutex and re-check under it, so all three call
>> sites are covered regardless of their own locking. The existing
>> doorbell_mutex users (kfd_get_kernel_doorbell() /
>> kfd_release_kernel_doorbell()) only guard the device-global
>> kfd->doorbell_bitmap in short non-sleeping sections and never call
>> into this path, so there is no nesting.
>>
>> This vulnerability was discovered by Tencent CodeBuddy Security.
>>
>> Fixes: 428542d91772 ("drm/amd/display: Setup for
>> mmhubbub3_warmup_mcif with big buffer")
>> Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
>
> I'm applying the patch to amd-staging-drm-next.
An automatic Claude review pointed out two problems with the patch. I
agree with both:
The Fixes: tag points at an unrelated drm/amd/display commit
(428542d91772). It must be corrected — 2105a15a2046 ("drm/amdgpu: use
doorbell mgr for kfd process doorbells") is the commit that introduced
the allocation being fixed.
The patch holds the device-global kfd->doorbell_mutex across
bitmap_zalloc(GFP_KERNEL) and amdgpu_bo_create_kernel(), while that same
mutex is already acquired under dqm_lock via start_cpsch -> pm_init ->
kq_initialize -> kfd_get_kernel_doorbell(). That is a plausible ABBA
inversion once reclaim/TTM eviction runs the KFD eviction fence back
into dqm_lock. Please either post lockdep (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) results
for a boot + queue-create cycle, or switch to a per-process-device lock,
which also avoids serialising unrelated processes behind a device-wide
mutex for per-process state.
Regards,
Felix
>
> Thanks,
> Felix
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
>> index fdcf7f2d1b5b4..07f881573837e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
>> @@ -257,12 +257,21 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev
>> *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
>> int r;
>> struct qcm_process_device *qpd = &pdd->qpd;
>>
>> + mutex_lock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
>> +
>> + /* Another thread may have won the check-and-allocate race */
>> + if (qpd->proc_doorbells) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* Allocate bitmap for dynamic doorbell allocation */
>> qpd->doorbell_bitmap =
>> bitmap_zalloc(KFD_MAX_NUM_OF_QUEUES_PER_PROCESS,
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!qpd->doorbell_bitmap) {
>> DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbell bitmap\n");
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + r = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto unlock;
>> }
>>
>> r = init_doorbell_bitmap(&pdd->qpd, kfd);
>> @@ -284,11 +293,15 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev
>> *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
>> DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbells\n");
>> goto err;
>> }
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
>> return 0;
>>
>> err:
>> bitmap_free(qpd->doorbell_bitmap);
>> qpd->doorbell_bitmap = NULL;
>> +unlock:
>> + mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
>> return r;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations
2026-10-09 15:33 ` Kuehling, Felix
@ 2026-10-10 2:55 ` henry martin
2026-10-10 3:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Henry Martin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: henry martin @ 2026-10-10 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kuehling, Felix
Cc: Alex Deucher, Christian König, David Airlie, Simona Vetter,
Harry Wentland, Alex Hung, amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel
Hi Felix,
You're right on both counts, thanks for the careful look.
v2 drops kfd->doorbell_mutex entirely and adds a per-process-device
mutex in struct kfd_process_device (initialized in
kfd_create_process_device_data()). The device-global mutex is no
longer held across the sleeping allocations, so the existing
dqm->lock -> doorbell_mutex order on the start_cpsch() -> pm_init()
-> kq_initialize() path cannot invert, and unrelated processes no
longer serialize against each other for per-process doorbell setup.
The Fixes tag is corrected to 2105a15a2046 ("drm/amdgpu: use
doorbell mgr for kfd process doorbells").
Regards,
Henry
Kuehling, Felix <felix.kuehling@amd.com> 于2026年10月9日周五 23:33写道:
>
> On 2026-10-09 11:00, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> > On 2026-10-09 06:18, Henry Martin wrote:
> >> The check-and-allocate sequence on pdd->qpd.proc_doorbells is
> >> lockless at every call site of kfd_alloc_process_doorbells():
> >> kfd_get_process_doorbells() (mmap of /dev/kfd), kfd_ioctl_create_queue()
> >> and the CRIU restore path each test the pointer under different
> >> locking (or none), so two racing threads can both observe NULL and
> >> each allocate a doorbell BO and bitmap, orphaning one allocation and
> >> handing the two mappings different backing pages.
> >>
> >> Move the serialization into kfd_alloc_process_doorbells() itself:
> >> take kfd->doorbell_mutex and re-check under it, so all three call
> >> sites are covered regardless of their own locking. The existing
> >> doorbell_mutex users (kfd_get_kernel_doorbell() /
> >> kfd_release_kernel_doorbell()) only guard the device-global
> >> kfd->doorbell_bitmap in short non-sleeping sections and never call
> >> into this path, so there is no nesting.
> >>
> >> This vulnerability was discovered by Tencent CodeBuddy Security.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 428542d91772 ("drm/amd/display: Setup for
> >> mmhubbub3_warmup_mcif with big buffer")
> >> Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
> >
> > I'm applying the patch to amd-staging-drm-next.
>
> An automatic Claude review pointed out two problems with the patch. I
> agree with both:
>
> The Fixes: tag points at an unrelated drm/amd/display commit
> (428542d91772). It must be corrected — 2105a15a2046 ("drm/amdgpu: use
> doorbell mgr for kfd process doorbells") is the commit that introduced
> the allocation being fixed.
>
> The patch holds the device-global kfd->doorbell_mutex across
> bitmap_zalloc(GFP_KERNEL) and amdgpu_bo_create_kernel(), while that same
> mutex is already acquired under dqm_lock via start_cpsch -> pm_init ->
> kq_initialize -> kfd_get_kernel_doorbell(). That is a plausible ABBA
> inversion once reclaim/TTM eviction runs the KFD eviction fence back
> into dqm_lock. Please either post lockdep (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) results
> for a boot + queue-create cycle, or switch to a per-process-device lock,
> which also avoids serialising unrelated processes behind a device-wide
> mutex for per-process state.
>
> Regards,
> Felix
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Felix
> >
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
> >> index fdcf7f2d1b5b4..07f881573837e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
> >> @@ -257,12 +257,21 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev
> >> *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
> >> int r;
> >> struct qcm_process_device *qpd = &pdd->qpd;
> >>
> >> + mutex_lock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
> >> +
> >> + /* Another thread may have won the check-and-allocate race */
> >> + if (qpd->proc_doorbells) {
> >> + mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> /* Allocate bitmap for dynamic doorbell allocation */
> >> qpd->doorbell_bitmap =
> >> bitmap_zalloc(KFD_MAX_NUM_OF_QUEUES_PER_PROCESS,
> >> GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!qpd->doorbell_bitmap) {
> >> DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbell bitmap\n");
> >> - return -ENOMEM;
> >> + r = -ENOMEM;
> >> + goto unlock;
> >> }
> >>
> >> r = init_doorbell_bitmap(&pdd->qpd, kfd);
> >> @@ -284,11 +293,15 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev
> >> *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
> >> DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbells\n");
> >> goto err;
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> err:
> >> bitmap_free(qpd->doorbell_bitmap);
> >> qpd->doorbell_bitmap = NULL;
> >> +unlock:
> >> + mutex_unlock(&kfd->doorbell_mutex);
> >> return r;
> >> }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations
2026-10-09 15:33 ` Kuehling, Felix
2026-10-10 2:55 ` henry martin
@ 2026-10-10 3:02 ` Henry Martin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Henry Martin @ 2026-10-10 3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix Kuehling, Alex Deucher, Christian König, David Airlie,
Simona Vetter, Harry Wentland, Alex Hung
Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Henry Martin, stable
The check-and-allocate sequence on pdd->qpd.proc_doorbells is
lockless at every call site of kfd_alloc_process_doorbells():
kfd_get_process_doorbells() (mmap of /dev/kfd),
kfd_ioctl_create_queue() and the CRIU restore path each test the
pointer under different locking (or none), so two racing threads can
both observe NULL and each allocate a doorbell BO and bitmap,
orphaning one allocation and handing the two mappings different
backing pages.
Move the serialization into kfd_alloc_process_doorbells() itself,
using a new per-process-device mutex so all three call sites are
covered regardless of their own locking. The device-global
kfd->doorbell_mutex is not suitable here: it is acquired under
dqm->lock on the kernel-doorbell path (start_cpsch() -> pm_init() ->
kq_initialize() -> kfd_get_kernel_doorbell()), so holding it across
the sleeping allocations above would create a lock-ordering
inversion with dqm->lock via TTM eviction, and it would also
serialize doorbell setup of unrelated processes behind a
device-wide lock for per-process state.
This issue was discovered by Tencent CodeBuddy Security.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 2105a15a2046 ("drm/amdgpu: use doorbell mgr for kfd process doorbells")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
---
v2: Use a per-process-device mutex instead of kfd->doorbell_mutex
(avoids the dqm->lock ordering inversion and the device-wide
serialization) and correct the Fixes tag. Pointed out by Felix
Kuehling.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
index fdcf7f2d1b5b4..55acadc986bee 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
@@ -257,12 +257,21 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
int r;
struct qcm_process_device *qpd = &pdd->qpd;
+ mutex_lock(&pdd->doorbell_mutex);
+
+ /* Another thread may have won the check-and-allocate race */
+ if (qpd->proc_doorbells) {
+ mutex_unlock(&pdd->doorbell_mutex);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/* Allocate bitmap for dynamic doorbell allocation */
qpd->doorbell_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(KFD_MAX_NUM_OF_QUEUES_PER_PROCESS,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!qpd->doorbell_bitmap) {
DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbell bitmap\n");
- return -ENOMEM;
+ r = -ENOMEM;
+ goto unlock;
}
r = init_doorbell_bitmap(&pdd->qpd, kfd);
@@ -284,11 +293,15 @@ int kfd_alloc_process_doorbells(struct kfd_dev *kfd, struct kfd_process_device *
DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate process doorbells\n");
goto err;
}
+
+ mutex_unlock(&pdd->doorbell_mutex);
return 0;
err:
bitmap_free(qpd->doorbell_bitmap);
qpd->doorbell_bitmap = NULL;
+unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&pdd->doorbell_mutex);
return r;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
index d8631847f0eb9..96e59133fee02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
@@ -779,6 +779,9 @@ struct kfd_process_device {
/* per-process-per device QCM data structure */
struct qcm_process_device qpd;
+ /* Serializes process doorbell allocation for this device */
+ struct mutex doorbell_mutex;
+
/*Apertures*/
uint64_t lds_base;
uint64_t lds_limit;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
index 0a7c1900da959..4efe4dae79c13 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
@@ -1788,6 +1788,7 @@ struct kfd_process_device *kfd_create_process_device_data(struct kfd_node *dev,
pdd->dev = dev;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdd->qpd.queues_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdd->qpd.priv_queue_list);
+ mutex_init(&pdd->doorbell_mutex);
pdd->qpd.dqm = dev->dqm;
pdd->qpd.pqm = &p->pqm;
pdd->qpd.evicted = 0;
--
2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-10 3:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-09 10:18 [PATCH] amdkfd: fix doorbell allocation race creating duplicate allocations Henry Martin
2026-10-09 15:00 ` Kuehling, Felix
2026-10-09 15:33 ` Kuehling, Felix
2026-10-10 2:55 ` henry martin
2026-10-10 3:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Henry Martin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®