From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Kohei Enju <enju.kohei@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add Realm RTT mapping and invalidation helpers
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 19:25:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f45adbf-6f29-432f-9880-bfd585b7c0bb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111145758.217946-9-steven.price@arm.com>
On 11/11/2026 14:57, Steven Price wrote:
> Add the RMI RTT creation and unmap helpers needed by CCA Realm stage-2
> memory operations. REC exit handling and guest requested RIPAS changes
> follow in the vCPU series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Rework RTT creation and folding around missing or existing RTTs.
> Use a shared RMI block-size helper and handle alignment, partial
> progress and errors in range operations.
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h | 8 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c | 378 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c | 10 -
> include/linux/arm-rmi-cmds.h | 8 +
> 4 files changed, 385 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> index 58d825e40bdf..e64c3bcce160 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ int kvm_init_realm(struct kvm *kvm);
> void kvm_destroy_realm(struct kvm *kvm);
> int kvm_realm_teardown_stage2(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> +enum kvm_gfn_range_filter;
> +
> +void kvm_realm_unmap_range_filter(struct kvm *kvm,
> + unsigned long ipa,
> + unsigned long size,
> + bool may_block,
> + enum kvm_gfn_range_filter attr_filter);
> +
> static inline bool kvm_realm_is_private_address(struct realm *realm,
> unsigned long addr)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> index b904e6541fb0..5aa34d68de59 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> @@ -11,14 +11,6 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_pgtable.h>
> #include <asm/virt.h>
>
> -static inline unsigned long rmi_rtt_level_mapsize(int level)
> -{
> - if (WARN_ON(level > KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL))
> - return PAGE_SIZE;
> -
> - return (1UL << ARM64_HW_PGTABLE_LEVEL_SHIFT(level));
> -}
> -
> u32 kvm_rmm_ipa_limit(void)
> {
> return u64_get_bits(rmi_feat_reg(0), RMI_FEATURE_REGISTER_0_S2SZ);
> @@ -29,6 +21,75 @@ static int get_start_level(struct realm *realm)
> return 4 - max(2, stage2_pgtable_levels(realm->ia_bits));
> }
>
> +static int find_map_level(struct realm *realm,
> + unsigned long start,
> + unsigned long end)
> +{
> + int level = KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL;
> +
> + while (level > get_start_level(realm)) {
minor nit: Could we save the start_level in a local variable. The
generated assembly seems to be evaluating get_start_level() for each
iteration. For that matter, I don't mind caching this in struct realm,
as we end up calculating it quite often.
> + unsigned long map_size = kvm_granule_size(level - 1);
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(start, map_size) ||
> + (start + map_size) > end)
> + break;
> +
> + level--;
> + }
> +
> + return level;
> +}
> +
> +static int undelegate_range_desc(unsigned long desc)
> +{
> + unsigned long size = rmi_addr_block_size_to_bytes(RMI_ADDR_RANGE_BLOCK_SIZE(desc));
> + unsigned long count = RMI_ADDR_RANGE_COUNT(desc);
> + unsigned long addr = RMI_ADDR_RANGE_ADDR(desc);
> + unsigned long state = RMI_ADDR_RANGE_STATE(desc);
> +
> + if (state == RMI_OP_MEM_UNDELEGATED)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (size * count == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return rmi_undelegate_range(addr, size * count);
> +}
> +
> +static phys_addr_t alloc_delegated_granule(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t phys;
> + void *virt;
> +
> + if (mc) {
> + virt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(mc);
> + } else {
> + virt = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO |
> + __GFP_ACCOUNT);
> + }
> +
> + if (!virt)
> + return PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
> +
> + phys = virt_to_phys(virt);
> + if (rmi_delegate_page(phys)) {
> + free_page((unsigned long)virt);
> + return PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
> + }
> +
> + return phys;
> +}
> +
> +static phys_addr_t alloc_rtt(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t phys = alloc_delegated_granule(mc);
> +
> + if (phys != PHYS_ADDR_MAX)
> + kvm_account_pgtable_pages(phys_to_virt(phys), 1);
> +
> + return phys;
> +}
> +
> static void free_rtt(phys_addr_t phys)
> {
> kvm_account_pgtable_pages(phys_to_virt(phys), -1);
> @@ -36,6 +97,32 @@ static void free_rtt(phys_addr_t phys)
> kvm_account_pgtable_pages(phys_to_virt(phys), 1);
> }
>
> +static long realm_rtt_create(struct realm *realm,
> + unsigned long addr,
> + int level,
> + phys_addr_t phys)
> +{
> + addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, kvm_granule_size(level - 1));
> + return rmi_rtt_create(virt_to_phys(realm->rd), phys, addr, level);
> +}
> +
> +static long realm_rtt_fold(struct realm *realm,
> + unsigned long addr,
> + int level,
> + phys_addr_t *rtt_granule)
> +{
> + unsigned long out_rtt;
> + long ret;
> +
> + addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, kvm_granule_size(level - 1));
> + ret = rmi_rtt_fold(virt_to_phys(realm->rd), addr, level, &out_rtt);
> +
> + if (ret == RMI_SUCCESS && rtt_granule)
> + *rtt_granule = out_rtt;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * realm_rtt_destroy - Destroy an RTT at @level for @addr.
> *
> @@ -60,6 +147,47 @@ static long realm_rtt_destroy(struct realm *realm, unsigned long addr,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int realm_create_rtt_levels(struct realm *realm,
> + unsigned long ipa,
> + int level,
> + int max_level,
> + struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc)
> +{
> + long ret = 0;
> + phys_addr_t rtt = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
> +
> + while (level++ < max_level) {
> + if (rtt == PHYS_ADDR_MAX)
> + rtt = alloc_rtt(mc);
> + if (rtt == PHYS_ADDR_MAX)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = realm_rtt_create(realm, ipa, level, rtt);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + break;
> +
> + if (RMI_RESULT_STATUS(ret) == RMI_ERROR_RTT &&
> + RMI_RESULT_DATA_LEVEL(ret) == level - 1) {
> + /* The RTT already exists, reuse the granule at the next level. */
> + ret = 0;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + WARN(1, "Failed to create RTT at level %d: %ld\n",
> + level, ret);
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> + break;
> + }
> + rtt = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
> + }
> +
> + if (rtt != PHYS_ADDR_MAX)
> + free_rtt(rtt);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int realm_tear_down_rtt_level(struct realm *realm, int level,
> unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> @@ -69,7 +197,9 @@ static int realm_tear_down_rtt_level(struct realm *realm, int level,
> if (WARN_ON(level > KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - map_size = rmi_rtt_level_mapsize(level - 1);
> + map_size = kvm_granule_size(level - 1);
> + if (WARN_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(start, map_size)))
> + return -EINVAL;
>
I see, as discussed please move it to the other patch.
> for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
> phys_addr_t rtt_granule;
> @@ -156,12 +286,94 @@ static int realm_tear_down_rtt_range(struct realm *realm,
> start, end);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Returns 0 on successful fold, a negative value on error, a positive value if
> + * we were not able to fold all tables at this level.
> + */
> +static int realm_fold_rtt_level(struct realm *realm, int level,
> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + int not_folded = 0;
> + ssize_t map_size;
> + unsigned long addr, next_addr;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(level > KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + map_size = kvm_granule_size(level - 1);
> +
> + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
> + phys_addr_t rtt_granule;
> + long ret;
> +
> + next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1, map_size);
> +
retry: // See below
> + ret = realm_rtt_fold(realm, addr, level, &rtt_granule);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + switch (RMI_RESULT_STATUS(ret)) {
> + case RMI_SUCCESS:
> + free_rtt(rtt_granule);
> + break;
> + case RMI_ERROR_RTT: {
> + int err_level = RMI_RESULT_DATA_LEVEL(ret);
> +
> + if (err_level < level) {
> + /* No RTT at this level; skip the missing ancestor. */
> + if (WARN_ON(err_level < get_start_level(realm)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1,
> + kvm_granule_size(err_level - 1));
> + break;
> + }
> + if (level == KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL) {
> + not_folded++;
> + break;
> + }
> + /* Recurse a level deeper */
> + ret = realm_fold_rtt_level(realm,
> + level + 1,
> + addr,
> + min(next_addr, end));
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (ret) {
> + not_folded++;
> + break;
> + }
---8>---
> + /* Try once more after folding the child RTTs. */
> + ret = realm_rtt_fold(realm, addr, level, &rtt_granule);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (RMI_RESULT_STATUS(ret) == RMI_SUCCESS) {
> + free_rtt(rtt_granule);
> + break;
> + }
> + if (RMI_RESULT_STATUS(ret) != RMI_ERROR_RTT) {
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
---<8---
This seems like a repeat of the code above, could we do :
goto retry;
> + not_folded++;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return not_folded;
> +}
> +
> static int realm_destroy_rtts(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> unsigned int ia_bits = realm->ia_bits;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!realm->stage2_unmapped))
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> return realm_tear_down_rtt_range(realm, 0, (1UL << ia_bits));
> }
> @@ -191,6 +403,154 @@ int kvm_realm_teardown_stage2(struct kvm *kvm)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void realm_unmap_shared_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> + unsigned long start,
> + unsigned long end,
> + bool may_block)
> +{
> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> + unsigned long rd = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
> + unsigned long next_addr, addr;
> + unsigned long shared_bit = BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1);
> +
> + if (start >= end)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * Callers may pass either an IPA range or its shared alias. Add the
> + * shared bit only for the former. Use addition so an exclusive end at
> + * shared_bit advances to the end of the IPA space.
> + */
> + if (start < shared_bit) {
> + start += shared_bit;
> + end += shared_bit;
Could this overflow "end" to beyond ipa_size ? Why are we not using
addr |= shared_bit;
?
> + }
> +
> + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
> + long ret;
> +
> + ret = rmi_rtt_unprot_unmap(rd, addr, end, RMI_ADDR_TYPE_NONE,
> + 0, &next_addr, NULL, NULL);
I am wondering if this should be wrapped in a
ret = rmi_rtt_unprot_unmap_single(rd, addr, end, &next_addr);
But, we might replace these with an ADDR_TYPE_LIST in the near future,
so may be not.
> + if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
> + return;
> +
> + switch (RMI_RESULT_STATUS(ret)) {
> + case RMI_SUCCESS:
> + break;
> + case RMI_ERROR_RTT: {
> + int err_level = RMI_RESULT_DATA_LEVEL(ret);
> + int level = find_map_level(realm, addr, end);
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(err_level > KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL))
> + return;
> +
> + if (err_level >= level) {
> + /* Nothing present, so skip */
> + next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1,
> + kvm_granule_size(err_level));
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + ret = realm_create_rtt_levels(realm, addr, err_level,
> + level, NULL);
> + if (WARN_ON(ret))
> + return;
> + /* Retry with the RTT levels in place */
> + next_addr = addr;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (may_block)
> + cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + }
> +
> + realm_fold_rtt_level(realm, get_start_level(realm) + 1,
> + start, end);
> +}
> +
> +static void realm_unmap_private_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> + unsigned long start,
> + unsigned long end,
> + bool may_block)
> +{
> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> + unsigned long rd = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
> + unsigned long next_addr, addr;
> + long ret;
> +
> + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
> + unsigned long out_range;
> + unsigned long flags = RMI_ADDR_TYPE_SINGLE;
> + /* TODO: Optimise using RMI_ADDR_TYPE_LIST */
With RMI_ADDR_TYPE_LIST support, I think we may be able to merge
realm_unmap_shared_range() with this, by simply selecting the call
data_unmap vs unprot_unmap
> +
> + ret = rmi_rtt_data_unmap(rd, addr, end, flags, 0,
> + &next_addr, &out_range, NULL);
> + if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
> + return;
> +
> + switch (RMI_RESULT_STATUS(ret)) {
> + case RMI_SUCCESS:
> + ret = undelegate_range_desc(out_range);
> + if (WARN_ON(ret))
> + return;
> + break;
> + case RMI_ERROR_RTT: {
> + int err_level = RMI_RESULT_DATA_LEVEL(ret);
> + int level = find_map_level(realm, addr, end);
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(err_level > KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL))
> + return;
> +
> + if (err_level >= level) {
> + /* Nothing present, so skip this RTT entry. */
> + next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1,
> + kvm_granule_size(err_level));
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + ret = realm_create_rtt_levels(realm, addr, err_level,
> + level, NULL);
> + if (WARN_ON(ret))
> + return;
> + /* Retry with the RTT levels in place. */
> + next_addr = addr;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (may_block)
> + cond_resched_rwlock_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + }
> +
> + realm_fold_rtt_level(realm, get_start_level(realm) + 1,
> + start, end);
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_realm_unmap_range_filter(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> + unsigned long size, bool may_block,
> + enum kvm_gfn_range_filter attr_filter)
> +{
> + unsigned long end = start + size;
> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> +
> + if (!kvm_realm_is_created(kvm))
> + return;
> +
Do we need to ensure we get the canonical GPA for start here ?
Suzuki
> + end = min(BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1), end);
> +
> + if (attr_filter & KVM_FILTER_SHARED)
> + realm_unmap_shared_range(kvm, start, end, may_block);
> + if (attr_filter & KVM_FILTER_PRIVATE)
> + realm_unmap_private_range(kvm, start, end, may_block);
> +}
> +
> void kvm_destroy_realm(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c
> index 77255a90e0a6..a9f42c9a4f79 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #include <asm/memory.h>
> -#include <asm/pgtable-hwdef.h>
>
> /* RMM v2.0 defines RmiFeatureRegister0 to RmiFeatureRegister4. */
> static unsigned long rmi_feat_reg_cache[5] __ro_after_init;
> @@ -183,15 +182,6 @@ int rmi_free_delegated_page(phys_addr_t phys)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rmi_free_delegated_page);
>
> -/*
> - * Convert the RmiAddrBlockSize to actual size. This is used in RmiDonateReq
> - * and RmiAddrRangeDesc*.
> - */
> -static unsigned long rmi_addr_block_size_to_bytes(unsigned long block_size_fld)
> -{
> - return BIT(ARM64_HW_PGTABLE_LEVEL_SHIFT(3 - block_size_fld));
> -}
> -
> /*
> * free_addr_range: Free memory described by the address range entry, which may
> * be partially consumed by RMM.
> diff --git a/include/linux/arm-rmi-cmds.h b/include/linux/arm-rmi-cmds.h
> index 6f43eac7c7be..71ba94eb72c0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arm-rmi-cmds.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm-rmi-cmds.h
> @@ -13,8 +13,16 @@
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> +#include <asm/pgtable-hwdef.h>
> +
> #define RMI_MAX_ADDR_LIST 256
>
> +/* Convert the block size used by RmiDonateReq and RmiAddrRangeDesc. */
> +static inline unsigned long rmi_addr_block_size_to_bytes(unsigned long block_size)
> +{
> + return BIT(ARM64_HW_PGTABLE_LEVEL_SHIFT(3 - block_size));
> +}
> +
> struct rmi_sro_state {
> struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs regs;
> int addr_count;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 14:57 [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Prepare Realm memory management Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Reserve the RMM mode Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: arm64: guest_memfd: Check mmap support when preparing memslot Steven Price
2026-11-11 15:21 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-12 10:43 ` Steven Price
2026-11-12 16:35 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-12 16:57 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Introduce Realms Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Check RMI support and features at init Steven Price
2026-11-12 16:39 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-13 11:49 ` Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: arm64: Handle attributes in stage2_unmap_range Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add basic infrastructure for creating a realm Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Tear down RTTs Steven Price
2026-11-13 1:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-13 15:05 ` Steven Price
2026-11-13 16:26 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-11-13 16:40 ` Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add Realm RTT mapping and invalidation helpers Steven Price
2026-11-13 19:25 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: Allow architectures to reject memslot changes before invalidation Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Prevent memslot modifications after Realm creation Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Support runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add Realm stage-2 MMU operations Steven Price
2026-11-12 9:08 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Prepare Realm memory management Kohei Enju
2026-11-12 9:41 ` Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f45adbf-6f29-432f-9880-bfd585b7c0bb@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=enju.kohei@fujitsu.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®