mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tarunsahu@google.com
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	robin.murphy@arm.com,  maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	 Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
	seanjc@google.com, jgg@nvidia.com, loganodell@google.com,
	 arnd@arndb.de, dwmw2@infradead.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
	 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	oupton@kernel.org, alex@shazbot.org,  gle.com@google.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com,  Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	 Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	 iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 skhawaja@google.com, sagis@google.com,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/19] kho: block: Record the entry size in the block header
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 05:45:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9huz1p8rrkdk.fsf@tarunix.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DMRK0PU0VCN3.15F59WLOQ05P4@soleen.com>

"Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> writes:

> On Tue Nov 10, 2026 at 12:01 AM EST, Tarun Sahu wrote:
>> Subsystems using the KHO Serialization Blocks framework currently do
>> not record the serialized entry size in the block header. The entry size
>> is only known to individual callers, which must track and store it in an
>> owning serialized data structure. If a newer source kernel adds fields
>> to an entry, the changed entry size breaks the stride when an older
>> target kernel iterates over blocks.
>>
>> Add an entry_size field to struct kho_block_header_ser. On the outgoing
>> side, record bs->entry_size into every block header during allocation.
>> During restoration, derive the entry stride directly from the block
>> header instead of relying on caller-supplied dimensions. The
>> kho_block_set_init() interface remains unchanged. A zero entry size,
>> or one that differs between blocks of a set, is rejected during
>> restoration.
>>
>> This change modifies the serialized layout of struct kho_block_header_ser
>> and shifts the offset of serialized entries within preserved blocks.
>> Bump KHO_FDT_COMPATIBLE from kho-v4 to kho-v5 so that pre-v5 and post-v5
>> kernels cleanly reject mismatched handover state during boot. Also
>> update the stale compatible string example in the documentation.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Tarun Sahu <tarunsahu@google.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/kho/abi/block.h          | 10 ++++----
>>  include/linux/kho/abi/kexec_handover.h |  6 ++---
>>  kernel/liveupdate/kho_block.c          | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/kho/abi/block.h b/include/linux/kho/abi/block.h
>> index 36bdbaf9b3b8..a40b0906c821 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kho/abi/block.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kho/abi/block.h
>> @@ -40,9 +40,10 @@
>>  
>>  /**
>>   * struct kho_block_header_ser - Header for the serialized data block.
>> - * @next:  Physical address of the next struct kho_block_header_ser.
>> - * @count: The number of entries that immediately follow this header in the
>> - *         memory block.
>> + * @next:       Physical address of the next struct kho_block_header_ser.
>> + * @count:      The number of entries that immediately follow this header in the
>> + *              memory block.
>> + * @entry_size: The size in bytes of each serialized entry in the block.
>>   *
>>   * This structure is located at the beginning of a block of physical memory
>>   * preserved across a kexec. It provides the necessary metadata to interpret
>> @@ -51,9 +52,10 @@
>>  struct kho_block_header_ser {
>>  	u64 next;
>>  	u64 count;
>> +	u64 entry_size;
>>  };
>>  
>> -static_assert(sizeof(struct kho_block_header_ser) == 16);
>> +static_assert(sizeof(struct kho_block_header_ser) == 24);
>>  static_assert(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) ||
>>  	      __alignof__(struct kho_block_header_ser) == 8);
>
> The above change goes away once my comment on the previous patch 
> is addressed.

Ack.

>
>>  
>> diff --git a/include/linux/kho/abi/kexec_handover.h b/include/linux/kho/abi/kexec_handover.h
>> index 2f4fb9c63942..6f12f5037ea5 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kho/abi/kexec_handover.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kho/abi/kexec_handover.h
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
>>   *   restore the preserved data.::
>>   *
>>   *     / {
>> - *         compatible = "kho-v3";
>> + *         compatible = "kho-v5";
>>   *
>>   *         preserved-memory-map = <0x...>;
>>   *
>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
>>   *     };
>>   *
>>   *   Root KHO Node (/):
>> - *     - compatible: "kho-v3"
>> + *     - compatible: "kho-v5"
>
> These are just examples, don't update them.
>
Got it.

>>   *
>>   *       Identifies the overall KHO ABI version.
>>   *
>> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
>>   */
>>  
>>  /* The compatible string for the KHO FDT root node. */
>> -#define KHO_FDT_COMPATIBLE "kho-v4"
>> +#define KHO_FDT_COMPATIBLE "kho-v5"
>>  
>>  /* The FDT property for the preserved memory map. */
>>  #define KHO_FDT_MEMORY_MAP_PROP_NAME "preserved-memory-map"
>> diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/kho_block.c b/kernel/liveupdate/kho_block.c
>> index 0d2a342ef422..9b148009085e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/liveupdate/kho_block.c
>> +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/kho_block.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,12 @@
>>   * array of serialized entries. Multiple blocks are linked together via a
>>   * physical pointer in the header, forming a linked list that can be easily
>>   * traversed in both the current and the next kernel.
>> + *
>> + * Each block header also records the size of its entries. A newer kernel may
>
> "newer kernel" does not make sense in the documentation comment, as any 
> kernel can do that. I would suggest "outgoing kernel." By the way, in 
> this series you use the terms "source" and "destination" kernel, whereas 
> traditionally we have used "outgoing" and "incoming." While both 
> conventions work, it would be preferable to maintain consistency.
>

I used source and target, based one of the discussion we had in
hypervisor liveupdate meeting. But, for consistency, I agree, I will
change it to outgoing and incoming.

~Tarun

>> + * append fields to an entry, so the kernel that writes a block and the kernel
>> + * that reads it can use different entry sizes. The reader steps through the
>> + * entries with the recorded size, so every entry is found, and it does not read
>> + * beyond the recorded size of an entry.
>>   */
>>  
>>  #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>> @@ -110,6 +116,8 @@ static int kho_block_set_grow_one(struct kho_block_set *bs)
>>  	if (IS_ERR(ser))
>>  		return PTR_ERR(ser);
>>  
>> +	ser->entry_size = bs->entry_size;
>> +
>>  	err = kho_block_add(bs, ser);
>>  	if (err) {
>>  		kho_block_free_ser(bs, ser);
>> @@ -242,7 +250,8 @@ static bool kho_block_set_is_cyclic(struct kho_block_set *bs)
>>   *
>>   * Restores a serialized block set from a given physical address. The caller is
>>   * responsible for ensuring that the block set @bs has been allocated and
>> - * initialized prior to calling this function.
>> + * initialized prior to calling this function. The entry size and the number
>> + * of entries per block are taken from the restored block headers.
>>   *
>>   * Return: 0 on success, or a negative errno on failure.
>>   */
>> @@ -250,6 +259,7 @@ int kho_block_set_restore(struct kho_block_set *bs, u64 head_pa)
>>  {
>>  	struct kho_block_header_ser *ser;
>>  	u64 next_pa = head_pa;
>> +	u64 entry_size = 0;
>>  	int err;
>>  
>>  	/* Restored block sets use size from the previous kernel */
>> @@ -264,8 +274,21 @@ int kho_block_set_restore(struct kho_block_set *bs, u64 head_pa)
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	while (next_pa) {
>> +		u64 capacity;
>> +
>>  		ser = phys_to_virt(next_pa);
>> -		if (!ser->count || ser->count > bs->count_per_block) {
>> +		if (!ser->entry_size || (entry_size && ser->entry_size != entry_size)) {
>> +			pr_warn("Block contains invalid entry size: %llu\n",
>> +				ser->entry_size);
>> +			err = -EINVAL;
>> +			goto err_destroy;
>> +		}
>> +		entry_size = ser->entry_size;
>> +		bs->entry_size = entry_size;
>> +		capacity = (KHO_BLOCK_SIZE - sizeof(*ser)) / bs->entry_size;
>> +		bs->count_per_block = capacity;
>> +
>> +		if (!ser->count || ser->count > capacity) {
>>  			pr_warn("Block contains invalid entry count: %llu\n",
>>  				ser->count);
>>  			err = -EINVAL;
>> @@ -370,7 +393,10 @@ void *kho_block_set_it_reserve_entry(struct kho_block_set_it *it)
>>   * @it: The block iterator.
>>   *
>>   * Iterates through previously written entries during state deserialization,
>> - * respecting the actual count stored in each block's header.
>> + * respecting the actual count stored in each block's header. Entries are
>> + * spaced by the entry size recorded by the kernel that wrote them, which can
>> + * be smaller or larger than the caller's structure. Fields beyond that size
>> + * are not present in the entry.
>>   *
>>   * Return: A pointer to the next serialized entry, or NULL if all serialized
>>   * entries have been read.
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Pasha

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11  5:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10  5:01 [PATCH v4 00/19] kho, liveupdate: Add feature header for fine-grained ABI compatibility Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] liveupdate, kho: Remove __packed from KHO, LUO and memfd ABI structures Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 12:56   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10 17:28     ` tarunsahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] kho: block: Record the entry size in the block header Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 13:10   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-11  5:45     ` tarunsahu [this message]
2026-11-10 17:03   ` David Matlack
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] kho, memfd_luo: Reference struct kho_vmalloc via serialized pointer Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 14:23   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-11  6:20     ` tarunsahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] liveupdate: Reference struct luo_file_set_ser " Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 14:47   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] kho: Add feature header for fine-grained ABI compatibility Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 14:47   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10 18:13     ` tarunsahu
2026-11-10 15:12   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10 18:25     ` tarunsahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] kho: kexec_metadata: Add the feature header Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 15:08   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-11  6:33     ` tarunsahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] kho: vmalloc: " Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] kho: block: Add the feature header to blocks Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 17:07   ` David Matlack
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_session_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_file_set_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_file_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_flb_header_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_flb_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] PCI: liveupdate: Add feature header to struct pci_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 16:39   ` David Matlack
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] PCI: liveupdate: Add feature header to struct pci_dev_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 16:23   ` David Matlack
2026-11-10  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] mm: memfd_luo: Add feature header to struct memfd_luo_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] mm: memfd_luo: Add feature header to struct memfd_luo_folio_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] kho: Add KUnit test for the feature header helpers Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 12:48 ` [PATCH v4 00/19] kho, liveupdate: Add feature header for fine-grained ABI compatibility Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-11  5:36   ` tarunsahu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9huz1p8rrkdk.fsf@tarunix.c.googlers.com \
    --to=tarunsahu@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gle.com@google.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loganodell@google.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sagis@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®