Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] interconnect: qcom: Add Milos interconnect provider driver

["Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>]

Hi Georgi,

On Mon Jul 21, 2025 at 9:36 AM CEST, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> On 7/9/25 4:14 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> Add driver for the Qualcomm interconnect buses found in Milos based
>> platforms. The topology consists of several NoCs that are controlled by
>> a remote processor that collects the aggregated bandwidth for each
>> master-slave pairs.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig  |    9 +
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile |    2 +
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/milos.c  | 1837 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 1848 insertions(+)
>> 
> [..]
>> +
>> +static struct qcom_icc_qosbox qhm_qup1_qos = {
>> +	.num_ports = 1,
>> +	.port_offsets = { 0xc000 },
>> +	.prio = 2,
>> +	.urg_fwd = 0,
>> +	.prio_fwd_disable = 1,
>> +};
>
> Thanks for adding QoS!
>
>> +
>> +static struct qcom_icc_node qhm_qup1 = {
>> +	.name = "qhm_qup1",
>> +	.channels = 1,
>> +	.buswidth = 4,
>> +	.qosbox = &qhm_qup1_qos,
>> +	.link_nodes = { &qns_a1noc_snoc, NULL },
>> +};
>
> It's very nice that you switched to the dynamic IDs, but please use the
> current style of links (like in v1), as the the NULL terminated lists
> are not merged yet. All the rest looks good!

Is what's in todays linux-next a good base? Or what branch should I base
this on? But correct, I currently have v2 of dynamic ID patches in the
base for this.

Also If I send the next revision by e.g. Wednesday can it still go into
6.17? Just wondering how quick I need to work on this.

Regards
Luca

>
> Thanks,
> Georgi