Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] interconnect: qcom: Add Milos interconnect provider driver

["Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>]

Hi Georgi,

On Mon Jul 21, 2025 at 9:42 AM CEST, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Hi Georgi,
>
> On Mon Jul 21, 2025 at 9:36 AM CEST, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> Hi Luca,
>>
>> On 7/9/25 4:14 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> Add driver for the Qualcomm interconnect buses found in Milos based
>>> platforms. The topology consists of several NoCs that are controlled by
>>> a remote processor that collects the aggregated bandwidth for each
>>> master-slave pairs.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig  |    9 +
>>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile |    2 +
>>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/milos.c  | 1837 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   3 files changed, 1848 insertions(+)
>>> 
>> [..]
>>> +
>>> +static struct qcom_icc_node qhm_qup1 = {
>>> +	.name = "qhm_qup1",
>>> +	.channels = 1,
>>> +	.buswidth = 4,
>>> +	.qosbox = &qhm_qup1_qos,
>>> +	.link_nodes = { &qns_a1noc_snoc, NULL },
>>> +};
>>
>> It's very nice that you switched to the dynamic IDs, but please use the
>> current style of links (like in v1), as the the NULL terminated lists
>> are not merged yet. All the rest looks good!
>
> Is what's in todays linux-next a good base? Or what branch should I base
> this on? But correct, I currently have v2 of dynamic ID patches in the
> base for this.
>
> Also If I send the next revision by e.g. Wednesday can it still go into
> 6.17? Just wondering how quick I need to work on this.

In case you didn't receive my message on IRC, your icc-milos branch plus
the following patch works fine:
https://public.lucaweiss.eu/tmp/0001-fixup-interconnect-qcom-Add-Milos-interconnect-provi.patch

One num_nodes was wrong, and alloc_dyn_id needs to still be set without
the extra patches from the mailing list.

Regards
Luca

>
> Regards
> Luca
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Georgi