mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: "Yury Norov" <ynorov@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"Burak Emir" <burak.emir@gmail.com>,
	"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
	"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
	"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
	"Tamir Duberstein" <tamird@kernel.org>,
	"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	"Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>, "Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>,
	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] rust: id_pool: do not round capacity up to BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 07:44:19 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMRW81BTJRI1.6KL933YC1FM8@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <avNXkJjOoTzUu-1r@yury>

On Wed Nov 11, 2026 at 2:42 AM JST, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 05:32:52PM +0900, Eliot Courtney wrote:
>> Current code in IdPool::with_capacity rounds the capacity up to
>> BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN, but BitmapVec::new works fine with values
>> smaller than this and still uses an inline representation. Remove this
>> behaviour.
>> 
>> This allows specifying a real capacity of 0, which was not previously
>> possible.
>
> How real capacity 0 became possible? Did we eventually find a use case
> for it? If not, it should not be possible, and the implementation
> should not explicitly handle that case.
>
>> This breaks `grow_request` in this case, so change it to grow
>> to at least `BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN`, mirroring the capacity floor in
>> `shrink_request`.
>
> Not the grow_request only, I believe. I recall the discussion about
> panic on most operations on a 0-bit pool.

You have panics on most operations of a pool of any size if accessed out
of bounds. Zero size is not special.

>  
>> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Burak Emir <burak.emir@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eliot Courtney <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  rust/kernel/id_pool.rs | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs b/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs
>> index 92eeb7caa243..f77bd90325ff 100644
>> --- a/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs
>> +++ b/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs
>> @@ -112,13 +112,8 @@ pub fn new() -> Self {
>>      }
>>  
>>      /// Constructs a new [`IdPool`] with space for a specific number of bits.
>> -    ///
>> -    /// A capacity below [`MAX_INLINE_LEN`] is adjusted to [`MAX_INLINE_LEN`].
>> -    ///
>> -    /// [`MAX_INLINE_LEN`]: BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN
>>      #[inline]
>>      pub fn with_capacity(num_ids: usize, flags: Flags) -> Result<Self, AllocError> {
>> -        let num_ids = usize::max(num_ids, BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN);
>>          let map = BitmapVec::new(num_ids, flags)?;
>>          Ok(Self { map })
>>      }
>> @@ -152,6 +147,13 @@ pub fn capacity(&self) -> usize {
>>      /// let resizer = alloc_request.realloc(GFP_KERNEL)?;
>>      /// pool.shrink(resizer);
>>      /// assert_eq!(pool.capacity(), BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN);
>> +    ///
>> +    /// // A pool at the `MAX_INLINE_LEN` floor cannot shrink further.
>> +    /// assert!(pool.shrink_request().is_none());
>> +    ///
>> +    /// // Neither can a pool with a capacity below `MAX_INLINE_LEN`.
>> +    /// let small = IdPool::with_capacity(8, GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> +    /// assert!(small.shrink_request().is_none());
>>      /// # Ok::<(), AllocError>(())
>>      /// ```
>>      #[inline]
>> @@ -198,12 +200,36 @@ pub fn shrink(&mut self, mut resizer: PoolResizer) {
>>  
>>      /// Returns a [`ReallocRequest`] for growing this [`IdPool`], if possible.
>>      ///
>> +    /// Grows to at least [`MAX_INLINE_LEN`].
>>      /// The capacity of an [`IdPool`] cannot be grown above [`MAX_LEN`].
>>      ///
>> +    /// [`MAX_INLINE_LEN`]: BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN
>>      /// [`MAX_LEN`]: BitmapVec::MAX_LEN
>> +    ///
>> +    /// # Examples
>> +    ///
>> +    /// ```
>> +    /// use kernel::{
>> +    ///     alloc::AllocError,
>> +    ///     bitmap::BitmapVec,
>> +    ///     id_pool::IdPool, //
>> +    /// };
>> +    ///
>> +    /// // Grow goes to at least BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN.
>> +    /// let mut pool = IdPool::with_capacity(1, GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> +    /// let resizer = pool.grow_request().ok_or(AllocError)?.realloc(GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> +    /// pool.grow(resizer);
>> +    /// assert_eq!(pool.capacity(), BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN);
>> +    ///
>> +    /// // Grow doubles if at least BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN.
>> +    /// let resizer = pool.grow_request().ok_or(AllocError)?.realloc(GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> +    /// pool.grow(resizer);
>> +    /// assert_eq!(pool.capacity(), 2 * BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN);
>> +    /// # Ok::<(), AllocError>(())
>> +    /// ```
>>      #[inline]
>>      pub fn grow_request(&self) -> Option<ReallocRequest> {
>> -        let num_ids = self.capacity() * 2;
>> +        let num_ids = usize::max(BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN, self.capacity() * 2);
>
> You only need this max(...) thing to fix the behavior of 0-len bitmap.
> We don't have any users with the request to support them. Please don't
> add any extra code to handle unwanted and unsupported cases.

No, this code is a side-effect of the pool not being rounded up to
`MAX_INLINE_LEN` (note how the `max` moved from `with_capacity). It
would still be there even if we did not support zero-size.

Forbidding zero-sized pools would actually require *more* code in this
patch to enforce that rule, and would not allow us to remove any in
exchange afaict.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-09  8:32 [PATCH v11 0/5] rust: Add support for reserving of ranges of IDs Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09  8:32 ` [PATCH v11 1/5] rust: io: use Alignment size constants Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09 12:37   ` Gary Guo
2026-11-10 17:17   ` Yury Norov
2026-11-09  8:32 ` [PATCH v11 2/5] rust: gpu: buddy: " Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09 12:37   ` Gary Guo
2026-11-10 17:21   ` Yury Norov
2026-11-09  8:32 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] gpu: nova-core: " Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09 12:37   ` Gary Guo
2026-11-10 17:22   ` Yury Norov
2026-11-09  8:32 ` [PATCH v11 4/5] rust: id_pool: do not round capacity up to BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09 12:08   ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-11-09 12:36   ` Gary Guo
2026-11-10  7:29     ` Eliot Courtney
2026-11-10 17:42   ` Yury Norov
2026-11-10 22:44     ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2026-11-09  8:32 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] gpu: nova-core: add ChannelIdPool Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09 21:21 ` (subset) [PATCH v11 0/5] rust: Add support for reserving of ranges of IDs Danilo Krummrich
2026-11-09 21:33 ` Danilo Krummrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DMRW81BTJRI1.6KL933YC1FM8@nvidia.com \
    --to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=burak.emir@gmail.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tamird@kernel.org \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    --cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
    --cc=ynorov@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®