From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: "Yury Norov" <ynorov@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Burak Emir" <burak.emir@gmail.com>,
"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
"Tamir Duberstein" <tamird@kernel.org>,
"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>, "Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] rust: id_pool: do not round capacity up to BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 07:44:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMRW81BTJRI1.6KL933YC1FM8@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <avNXkJjOoTzUu-1r@yury>
On Wed Nov 11, 2026 at 2:42 AM JST, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 05:32:52PM +0900, Eliot Courtney wrote:
>> Current code in IdPool::with_capacity rounds the capacity up to
>> BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN, but BitmapVec::new works fine with values
>> smaller than this and still uses an inline representation. Remove this
>> behaviour.
>>
>> This allows specifying a real capacity of 0, which was not previously
>> possible.
>
> How real capacity 0 became possible? Did we eventually find a use case
> for it? If not, it should not be possible, and the implementation
> should not explicitly handle that case.
>
>> This breaks `grow_request` in this case, so change it to grow
>> to at least `BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN`, mirroring the capacity floor in
>> `shrink_request`.
>
> Not the grow_request only, I believe. I recall the discussion about
> panic on most operations on a 0-bit pool.
You have panics on most operations of a pool of any size if accessed out
of bounds. Zero size is not special.
>
>> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Burak Emir <burak.emir@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eliot Courtney <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> rust/kernel/id_pool.rs | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs b/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs
>> index 92eeb7caa243..f77bd90325ff 100644
>> --- a/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs
>> +++ b/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs
>> @@ -112,13 +112,8 @@ pub fn new() -> Self {
>> }
>>
>> /// Constructs a new [`IdPool`] with space for a specific number of bits.
>> - ///
>> - /// A capacity below [`MAX_INLINE_LEN`] is adjusted to [`MAX_INLINE_LEN`].
>> - ///
>> - /// [`MAX_INLINE_LEN`]: BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN
>> #[inline]
>> pub fn with_capacity(num_ids: usize, flags: Flags) -> Result<Self, AllocError> {
>> - let num_ids = usize::max(num_ids, BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN);
>> let map = BitmapVec::new(num_ids, flags)?;
>> Ok(Self { map })
>> }
>> @@ -152,6 +147,13 @@ pub fn capacity(&self) -> usize {
>> /// let resizer = alloc_request.realloc(GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> /// pool.shrink(resizer);
>> /// assert_eq!(pool.capacity(), BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN);
>> + ///
>> + /// // A pool at the `MAX_INLINE_LEN` floor cannot shrink further.
>> + /// assert!(pool.shrink_request().is_none());
>> + ///
>> + /// // Neither can a pool with a capacity below `MAX_INLINE_LEN`.
>> + /// let small = IdPool::with_capacity(8, GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> + /// assert!(small.shrink_request().is_none());
>> /// # Ok::<(), AllocError>(())
>> /// ```
>> #[inline]
>> @@ -198,12 +200,36 @@ pub fn shrink(&mut self, mut resizer: PoolResizer) {
>>
>> /// Returns a [`ReallocRequest`] for growing this [`IdPool`], if possible.
>> ///
>> + /// Grows to at least [`MAX_INLINE_LEN`].
>> /// The capacity of an [`IdPool`] cannot be grown above [`MAX_LEN`].
>> ///
>> + /// [`MAX_INLINE_LEN`]: BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN
>> /// [`MAX_LEN`]: BitmapVec::MAX_LEN
>> + ///
>> + /// # Examples
>> + ///
>> + /// ```
>> + /// use kernel::{
>> + /// alloc::AllocError,
>> + /// bitmap::BitmapVec,
>> + /// id_pool::IdPool, //
>> + /// };
>> + ///
>> + /// // Grow goes to at least BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN.
>> + /// let mut pool = IdPool::with_capacity(1, GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> + /// let resizer = pool.grow_request().ok_or(AllocError)?.realloc(GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> + /// pool.grow(resizer);
>> + /// assert_eq!(pool.capacity(), BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN);
>> + ///
>> + /// // Grow doubles if at least BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN.
>> + /// let resizer = pool.grow_request().ok_or(AllocError)?.realloc(GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> + /// pool.grow(resizer);
>> + /// assert_eq!(pool.capacity(), 2 * BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN);
>> + /// # Ok::<(), AllocError>(())
>> + /// ```
>> #[inline]
>> pub fn grow_request(&self) -> Option<ReallocRequest> {
>> - let num_ids = self.capacity() * 2;
>> + let num_ids = usize::max(BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN, self.capacity() * 2);
>
> You only need this max(...) thing to fix the behavior of 0-len bitmap.
> We don't have any users with the request to support them. Please don't
> add any extra code to handle unwanted and unsupported cases.
No, this code is a side-effect of the pool not being rounded up to
`MAX_INLINE_LEN` (note how the `max` moved from `with_capacity). It
would still be there even if we did not support zero-size.
Forbidding zero-sized pools would actually require *more* code in this
patch to enforce that rule, and would not allow us to remove any in
exchange afaict.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 8:32 [PATCH v11 0/5] rust: Add support for reserving of ranges of IDs Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09 8:32 ` [PATCH v11 1/5] rust: io: use Alignment size constants Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09 12:37 ` Gary Guo
2026-11-10 17:17 ` Yury Norov
2026-11-09 8:32 ` [PATCH v11 2/5] rust: gpu: buddy: " Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09 12:37 ` Gary Guo
2026-11-10 17:21 ` Yury Norov
2026-11-09 8:32 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] gpu: nova-core: " Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09 12:37 ` Gary Guo
2026-11-10 17:22 ` Yury Norov
2026-11-09 8:32 ` [PATCH v11 4/5] rust: id_pool: do not round capacity up to BitmapVec::MAX_INLINE_LEN Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09 12:08 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-11-09 12:36 ` Gary Guo
2026-11-10 7:29 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-11-10 17:42 ` Yury Norov
2026-11-10 22:44 ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2026-11-09 8:32 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] gpu: nova-core: add ChannelIdPool Eliot Courtney
2026-11-09 21:21 ` (subset) [PATCH v11 0/5] rust: Add support for reserving of ranges of IDs Danilo Krummrich
2026-11-09 21:33 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMRW81BTJRI1.6KL933YC1FM8@nvidia.com \
--to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=burak.emir@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tamird@kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
--cc=ynorov@nvidia.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®