From: girish <girishvg@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: William Pitcock <nenolod@atheme.org>, girishvg@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include children count, in Threads: field present in /proc/<pid>/status (take-1)
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:51:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EE7C757E-E2CE-4617-A1D4-3B8F5E3E8240@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F2F2C98F-6AFB-4E19-BEE9-D32652E2F478@atheme.org>
On Sep 30, 2006, at 1:31 AM, William Pitcock wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 2006, at 10:18 AM, girish wrote:
>
>>
>> - buffer += sprintf(buffer, "Threads:\t%d\n", num_threads);
>> + buffer += sprintf(buffer, "Threads:\t%d\n", num_threads +
>> num_children);
>
> Personally, I'd prefer the children count to be separate, something
> like:
>
> buffer += sprintf(buffer, "Threads:\t%d (%d children, %d total)",
> num_threads, num_children, num_threads + num_children);
>
> That would be rather nice, indeed.
>
> Also, next time, make sure that linux-kernel is CC'd, not BCC'd.
>
> ---
> William Pitcock
> nenolod@atheme.org
> http://people.atheme.org/~nenolod/
> http://nenolod.net
>
>
Agree. It indeed look better. I too had an awk script in mind, to
parse the line. I ended up removing such formatting, because not all
process spawn child thread(s), showing num_children count as zero.
That looked bit odd. So here it is again - new wine.
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Girish V. Gulawani <girishvg@gmail.com>
--- linux-vanilla/fs/proc/array.c 2006-09-20 12:42:06.000000000 +0900
+++ linux/fs/proc/array.c 2006-09-30 01:47:25.000000000 +0900
@@ -248,6 +248,8 @@ static inline char * task_sig(struct tas
int num_threads = 0;
unsigned long qsize = 0;
unsigned long qlim = 0;
+ int num_children = 0;
+ struct list_head *_p;
sigemptyset(&pending);
sigemptyset(&shpending);
@@ -268,9 +270,14 @@ static inline char * task_sig(struct tas
qlim = p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_SIGPENDING].rlim_cur;
spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
}
+ list_for_each(_p, &p->children)
+ ++num_children;
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
- buffer += sprintf(buffer, "Threads:\t%d\n", num_threads);
+ buffer += sprintf(buffer, "Threads:\t%d", num_threads);
+ if (num_children)
+ buffer += sprintf(buffer, " (%d children, %d total)",
num_children, num_threads + num_children);
+ buffer += sprintf(buffer, "\n");
buffer += sprintf(buffer, "SigQ:\t%lu/%lu\n", qsize, qlim);
/* render them all */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-29 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-29 15:18 girish
2006-09-29 16:31 ` William Pitcock
2006-09-29 16:51 ` girish [this message]
2006-09-29 17:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-29 17:18 ` girish
2006-09-29 18:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-29 18:24 ` [PATCH] include children count, in Threads: field present in /proc/<pid>/status (take-3) girish
2006-09-29 22:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <E78297DA-5F0F-40FA-A008-89264570B313@gmail.com>
2006-09-30 17:11 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-10-01 11:34 ` girish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EE7C757E-E2CE-4617-A1D4-3B8F5E3E8240@gmail.com \
--to=girishvg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nenolod@atheme.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®