From: "Robert White" <rwhite@casabyte.com>
To: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
"Albert Cahalan" <albert@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <davem@redhat.com>,
<bcollins@debian.org>, <wli@holomorphy.com>,
<tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com>, <anton@samba.org>
Subject: RE: /proc/bus/pci
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 17:25:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PEEPIDHAKMCGHDBJLHKGEELACOAA.rwhite@casabyte.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306050847410.9939-100000@home.transmeta.com>
My Humble Opinion:
"hose0" -> bad, I know I didn't have a clue where it came from
"domain0" -> obscure but mathematical 8-), probably hard to teach what with
the name used all over heck
"phb0" -> "eh what is phb?" "primary host bridge"...
"bridge0" -> not bad, is it platform agnostic? (e.g. is the connection
called a bridge on non- Intel/AMD/PS platforms?) don't know... but if it
is... good
Note: There are no "good" synonyms for "Domain" (from M-W.com:)
"field, bailiwick, champaign, demesne, dominion, province, sphere, terrain,
territory, walk"
So, my heard groans for another "domain" in the computer, and I like the way
bridge reads
"devices/bridge0/bus2/dev11/fn0/whatever"
but regardless (going back to pc-isms) that puts things like the pci-agp
"bridge" and such into the namespace if one were to be especially
conformant, which may or may not be a good thing.
Rob.
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Linus Torvalds
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 8:52 AM
To: Albert Cahalan
Cc: linux-kernel; davem@redhat.com; bcollins@debian.org;
wli@holomorphy.com; tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com; anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: /proc/bus/pci
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Albert Cahalan wrote:
>
> Some of the IBMers use "phb" instead of "hose" or "domain".
Gods, did they run out of vowels in _that_ part of IBM too?
Where do they go? Is there somebody at IBM that hoards vowels, and will
one day hold the rest of the world hostage? "Mwahahahaa! If you don't buy
support from IBM, you can never use the letter 'A' again! Whahahahhhaah!".
I can see it now.
What the _f*ck_ is wrong with just calling it "PCI domain". It's a fine
word, and yes, "domain" is used commonly in computer language, but that's
a _good_ thing. Everybody immediately understands what it is about.
There is no goodness to acronyms where you have to be some "insider" to
know what the hell it means. That "hose" thing has the same problem: I
don't know about anybody else, but to me a "hose" is a logn narrow conduit
for water, and a "PCI hose" doesn't much make sense to me.
A "phb" just makes me go "Whaa?"
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-07 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-05 3:21 /proc/bus/pci Albert Cahalan
2003-06-05 3:35 ` /proc/bus/pci William Lee Irwin III
2003-06-05 4:23 ` /proc/bus/pci Linus Torvalds
2003-06-05 5:01 ` /proc/bus/pci David S. Miller
2003-06-05 12:05 ` /proc/bus/pci Albert Cahalan
2003-06-05 12:16 ` /proc/bus/pci David S. Miller
2003-06-05 12:42 ` /proc/bus/pci Albert Cahalan
2003-06-05 12:36 ` /proc/bus/pci Albert Cahalan
2003-06-05 15:51 ` /proc/bus/pci Linus Torvalds
2003-06-05 16:00 ` /proc/bus/pci William Lee Irwin III
2003-06-05 17:23 ` /proc/bus/pci Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-06-05 17:36 ` /proc/bus/pci William Lee Irwin III
2003-06-05 17:18 ` /proc/bus/pci Riley Williams
2003-06-06 16:30 ` /proc/bus/pci Ross Biro
2003-06-06 18:13 ` /proc/bus/pci Riley Williams
2003-06-07 2:02 ` /proc/bus/pci Horst von Brand
2003-06-07 0:25 ` Robert White [this message]
2003-06-07 0:35 ` /proc/bus/pci Linus Torvalds
2003-06-07 1:01 ` /proc/bus/pci Robert White
2003-06-07 1:43 ` /proc/bus/pci Albert Cahalan
2003-06-05 12:43 ` /proc/bus/pci Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-06-05 16:58 ` /proc/bus/pci Greg KH
2003-06-05 18:27 ` /proc/bus/pci Matt Wilson
2003-06-05 19:35 ` /proc/bus/pci Greg KH
[not found] <20030605125013$41ac@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030605160017$10e1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-06-05 16:41 ` /proc/bus/pci Julien Oster
2003-06-05 16:57 ` /proc/bus/pci Mike Dresser
2003-06-05 17:00 ` /proc/bus/pci Richard B. Johnson
2003-06-07 0:31 ` /proc/bus/pci Robert White
2003-06-05 20:49 ` /proc/bus/pci Michal Jaegermann
2003-06-12 4:29 ` /proc/bus/pci Andre Hedrick
2003-06-13 7:10 ` /proc/bus/pci Riley Williams
2003-06-13 8:43 ` /proc/bus/pci Olivier Galibert
2003-06-13 16:28 ` /proc/bus/pci Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-13 17:59 ` /proc/bus/pci Riley Williams
2003-06-13 19:37 ` /proc/bus/pci Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-09 17:03 /proc/bus/pci Grover, Andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PEEPIDHAKMCGHDBJLHKGEELACOAA.rwhite@casabyte.com \
--to=rwhite@casabyte.com \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=bcollins@debian.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®