mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
To: Julien Oster <lkml@mf.frodoid.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: /proc/bus/pci
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:00:43 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0306051252050.954@chaos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <frodoid.frodo.873cioa34p.fsf@usenet.frodoid.org>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Julien Oster wrote:

> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:
>
> Hello Linus,
>
> > What the _f*ck_ is wrong with just calling it "PCI domain". It's a fine
> > word, and yes, "domain" is used commonly in computer language, but that's
> > a _good_ thing. Everybody immediately understands what it is about.
>
> Actually... I might have a problem with it. The really large Sun
> Enterprise Servers have "Dynamic System Domains", DNS is made of
> "domains", there are "SCSI domains", in NIS you set up a "domain",
> virtual hosts at ISPs are sometimes just referred to as "domains" (ok,
> it's silly sales talk, but it's there) and I sometimes put my code
> into the "public domain".

[SNIPPED...]

I looked up domain in the dictionary and my eyes fell upon
diatribe, which I think describes the most common use of "domain".
Whatever happened to the word "group"? Why don't people just use
the word that was invented to represent commonality? Why do they
have to be "creative" and use words that are way out of context?

> Julien

Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.20 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-06-05 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20030605125013$41ac@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <20030605160017$10e1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-06-05 16:41   ` /proc/bus/pci Julien Oster
2003-06-05 16:57     ` /proc/bus/pci Mike Dresser
2003-06-05 17:00     ` Richard B. Johnson [this message]
2003-06-07  0:31       ` /proc/bus/pci Robert White
2003-06-05 20:49     ` /proc/bus/pci Michal Jaegermann
2003-06-12  4:29       ` /proc/bus/pci Andre Hedrick
2003-06-13  7:10         ` /proc/bus/pci Riley Williams
2003-06-13  8:43           ` /proc/bus/pci Olivier Galibert
2003-06-13 16:28           ` /proc/bus/pci Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-13 17:59             ` /proc/bus/pci Riley Williams
2003-06-13 19:37               ` /proc/bus/pci Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-09 17:03 /proc/bus/pci Grover, Andrew
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-05  3:21 /proc/bus/pci Albert Cahalan
2003-06-05  3:35 ` /proc/bus/pci William Lee Irwin III
2003-06-05  4:23 ` /proc/bus/pci Linus Torvalds
2003-06-05  5:01   ` /proc/bus/pci David S. Miller
2003-06-05 12:05   ` /proc/bus/pci Albert Cahalan
2003-06-05 12:16     ` /proc/bus/pci David S. Miller
2003-06-05 12:42       ` /proc/bus/pci Albert Cahalan
2003-06-05 12:36     ` /proc/bus/pci Albert Cahalan
2003-06-05 15:51       ` /proc/bus/pci Linus Torvalds
2003-06-05 16:00         ` /proc/bus/pci William Lee Irwin III
2003-06-05 17:23           ` /proc/bus/pci Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-06-05 17:36             ` /proc/bus/pci William Lee Irwin III
2003-06-05 17:18         ` /proc/bus/pci Riley Williams
2003-06-06 16:30         ` /proc/bus/pci Ross Biro
2003-06-06 18:13           ` /proc/bus/pci Riley Williams
2003-06-07  2:02           ` /proc/bus/pci Horst von Brand
2003-06-07  0:25         ` /proc/bus/pci Robert White
2003-06-07  0:35           ` /proc/bus/pci Linus Torvalds
2003-06-07  1:01             ` /proc/bus/pci Robert White
2003-06-07  1:43             ` /proc/bus/pci Albert Cahalan
2003-06-05 12:43     ` /proc/bus/pci Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-06-05 16:58 ` /proc/bus/pci Greg KH
2003-06-05 18:27   ` /proc/bus/pci Matt Wilson
2003-06-05 19:35     ` /proc/bus/pci Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0306051252050.954@chaos \
    --to=root@chaos.analogic.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@mf.frodoid.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®