From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 14:18:28 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207281358070.28515-100000@serv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020728033359.7B2A2444C@lists.samba.org>
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > - I only look at modules which contain an initcall
> > - I only order initcalls of level 6 and 7
>
> You don't seem to handle the ordering of initcalls within a module
> though: see net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack.o for an example of
> multiple inits which would be much better as separate initcalls.
Actually I'm most interested in ordering "module_init()" and you can have
only one of them per module or how do you want to implement multiple
initcalls per module?
> Especially since you don't cover any of the really interesting cases.
> Maybe if you could slowly extend it to cover the rest? (Hah, I
> know!).
I wouldn't mind if the remaining initcalls are converted to explicit
dependencies, but it's possible to sort automatically everything that can
be built as modules.
> > +init/generated-initcalls.c: .allinit.defs
> > + set -e; echo '#include <linux/init.h>' > $@; \
> > + sed -n < $< "s,^T ,,p" | sort > .defined.all; \
>
> I think you mean something like:
>
> sed -n "s,^T ,,p" < $<
Isn't that the same?
bye, Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-28 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-27 20:22 Roman Zippel
2002-07-28 3:31 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-28 3:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-07-28 4:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-28 8:50 ` Keith Adamson
2002-07-28 18:59 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-07-29 23:39 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-29 8:39 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-07-30 2:49 ` Keith Adamson
2002-07-30 2:51 ` Keith Adamson
2002-07-28 12:18 ` Roman Zippel [this message]
2002-07-29 23:46 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-30 23:04 ` [PATCH] automatic module_init ordering Roman Zippel
2002-07-31 2:33 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-07-31 3:26 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-31 17:06 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-07-31 23:28 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-28 21:59 ` [PATCH] automatic initcalls Kai Germaschewski
2002-07-29 18:56 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-07-29 20:14 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0207281358070.28515-100000@serv \
--to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®