mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: William Irwin <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] compound page: use page[1].lru
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:46:50 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0602121943150.15774@goblin.wat.veritas.com> (raw)

If a compound page has its own put_page_testzero destructor (the only
current example is free_huge_page), that is noted in page[1].mapping of
the compound page.  But that's rather a poor place to keep it: functions
which call set_page_dirty_lock after get_user_pages (e.g. Infiniband's
__ib_umem_release) ought to be checking first, otherwise set_page_dirty
is liable to crash on what's not the address of a struct address_space.

And now I'm about to make that worse: it turns out that every compound
page needs a destructor, so we can no longer rely on hugetlb pages going
their own special way, to avoid further problems of page->mapping reuse.
For example, not many people know that: on 50% of i386 -Os builds, the
first tail page of a compound page purports to be PageAnon (when its
destructor has an odd address), which surprises page_add_file_rmap.

Keep the compound page destructor in page[1].lru.next instead.  And to
free up the common pairing of mapping and index, also move compound page
order from index to lru.prev.  Slab reuses page->lru too: but if we ever
need slab to use compound pages, it can easily stack its use above this.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
---

 mm/hugetlb.c    |    4 ++--
 mm/page_alloc.c |   15 ++++++---------
 mm/swap.c       |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- 2.6.16-rc2-git11/mm/hugetlb.c	2006-02-10 12:28:04.000000000 +0000
+++ 2.6.16-rc2-git11+/mm/hugetlb.c	2006-02-10 19:54:44.000000000 +0000
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
 	BUG_ON(page_count(page));
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
-	page[1].mapping = NULL;
+	page[1].lru.next = NULL;			/* reset dtor */
 
 	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
 	enqueue_huge_page(page);
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_a
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
 	set_page_count(page, 1);
-	page[1].mapping = (void *)free_huge_page;
+	page[1].lru.next = (void *)free_huge_page;	/* set dtor */
 	for (i = 0; i < (HPAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SIZE); ++i)
 		clear_user_highpage(&page[i], addr);
 	return page;
--- 2.6.16-rc2-git11/mm/page_alloc.c	2006-02-10 12:28:04.000000000 +0000
+++ 2.6.16-rc2-git11+/mm/page_alloc.c	2006-02-10 20:03:19.000000000 +0000
@@ -169,20 +169,17 @@ static void bad_page(struct page *page)
  * All pages have PG_compound set.  All pages have their ->private pointing at
  * the head page (even the head page has this).
  *
- * The first tail page's ->mapping, if non-zero, holds the address of the
- * compound page's put_page() function.
- *
- * The order of the allocation is stored in the first tail page's ->index
- * This is only for debug at present.  This usage means that zero-order pages
- * may not be compound.
+ * The first tail page's ->lru.next holds the address of the compound page's
+ * put_page() function.  Its ->lru.prev holds the order of allocation.
+ * This usage means that zero-order pages may not be compound.
  */
 static void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned long order)
 {
 	int i;
 	int nr_pages = 1 << order;
 
-	page[1].mapping = NULL;
-	page[1].index = order;
+	page[1].lru.next = NULL;			/* set dtor */
+	page[1].lru.prev = (void *)order;
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
 		struct page *p = page + i;
 
@@ -196,7 +193,7 @@ static void destroy_compound_page(struct
 	int i;
 	int nr_pages = 1 << order;
 
-	if (unlikely(page[1].index != order))
+	if (unlikely((unsigned long)page[1].lru.prev != order))
 		bad_page(page);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
--- 2.6.16-rc2-git11/mm/swap.c	2006-02-10 12:28:04.000000000 +0000
+++ 2.6.16-rc2-git11+/mm/swap.c	2006-02-10 19:54:44.000000000 +0000
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static void put_compound_page(struct pag
 	if (put_page_testzero(page)) {
 		void (*dtor)(struct page *page);
 
-		dtor = (void (*)(struct page *))page[1].mapping;
+		dtor = (void (*)(struct page *))page[1].lru.next;
 		(*dtor)(page);
 	}
 }

             reply	other threads:[~2006-02-12 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-12 19:46 Hugh Dickins [this message]
2006-02-12 19:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] compound page: default destructor Hugh Dickins
2006-02-12 19:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] compound page: no access_process_vm check Hugh Dickins
2006-02-12 21:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] compound page: use page[1].lru Andrew Morton
2006-02-13  0:57   ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-13  2:13     ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-13  7:05       ` David S. Miller
2006-02-13  7:12         ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-13  7:59           ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0602121943150.15774@goblin.wat.veritas.com \
    --to=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®