From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: William Irwin <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] compound page: use page[1].lru
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:46:50 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0602121943150.15774@goblin.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
If a compound page has its own put_page_testzero destructor (the only
current example is free_huge_page), that is noted in page[1].mapping of
the compound page. But that's rather a poor place to keep it: functions
which call set_page_dirty_lock after get_user_pages (e.g. Infiniband's
__ib_umem_release) ought to be checking first, otherwise set_page_dirty
is liable to crash on what's not the address of a struct address_space.
And now I'm about to make that worse: it turns out that every compound
page needs a destructor, so we can no longer rely on hugetlb pages going
their own special way, to avoid further problems of page->mapping reuse.
For example, not many people know that: on 50% of i386 -Os builds, the
first tail page of a compound page purports to be PageAnon (when its
destructor has an odd address), which surprises page_add_file_rmap.
Keep the compound page destructor in page[1].lru.next instead. And to
free up the common pairing of mapping and index, also move compound page
order from index to lru.prev. Slab reuses page->lru too: but if we ever
need slab to use compound pages, it can easily stack its use above this.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++--
mm/page_alloc.c | 15 ++++++---------
mm/swap.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- 2.6.16-rc2-git11/mm/hugetlb.c 2006-02-10 12:28:04.000000000 +0000
+++ 2.6.16-rc2-git11+/mm/hugetlb.c 2006-02-10 19:54:44.000000000 +0000
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
BUG_ON(page_count(page));
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
- page[1].mapping = NULL;
+ page[1].lru.next = NULL; /* reset dtor */
spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
enqueue_huge_page(page);
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_a
}
spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
set_page_count(page, 1);
- page[1].mapping = (void *)free_huge_page;
+ page[1].lru.next = (void *)free_huge_page; /* set dtor */
for (i = 0; i < (HPAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SIZE); ++i)
clear_user_highpage(&page[i], addr);
return page;
--- 2.6.16-rc2-git11/mm/page_alloc.c 2006-02-10 12:28:04.000000000 +0000
+++ 2.6.16-rc2-git11+/mm/page_alloc.c 2006-02-10 20:03:19.000000000 +0000
@@ -169,20 +169,17 @@ static void bad_page(struct page *page)
* All pages have PG_compound set. All pages have their ->private pointing at
* the head page (even the head page has this).
*
- * The first tail page's ->mapping, if non-zero, holds the address of the
- * compound page's put_page() function.
- *
- * The order of the allocation is stored in the first tail page's ->index
- * This is only for debug at present. This usage means that zero-order pages
- * may not be compound.
+ * The first tail page's ->lru.next holds the address of the compound page's
+ * put_page() function. Its ->lru.prev holds the order of allocation.
+ * This usage means that zero-order pages may not be compound.
*/
static void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned long order)
{
int i;
int nr_pages = 1 << order;
- page[1].mapping = NULL;
- page[1].index = order;
+ page[1].lru.next = NULL; /* set dtor */
+ page[1].lru.prev = (void *)order;
for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
struct page *p = page + i;
@@ -196,7 +193,7 @@ static void destroy_compound_page(struct
int i;
int nr_pages = 1 << order;
- if (unlikely(page[1].index != order))
+ if (unlikely((unsigned long)page[1].lru.prev != order))
bad_page(page);
for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
--- 2.6.16-rc2-git11/mm/swap.c 2006-02-10 12:28:04.000000000 +0000
+++ 2.6.16-rc2-git11+/mm/swap.c 2006-02-10 19:54:44.000000000 +0000
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static void put_compound_page(struct pag
if (put_page_testzero(page)) {
void (*dtor)(struct page *page);
- dtor = (void (*)(struct page *))page[1].mapping;
+ dtor = (void (*)(struct page *))page[1].lru.next;
(*dtor)(page);
}
}
next reply other threads:[~2006-02-12 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-12 19:46 Hugh Dickins [this message]
2006-02-12 19:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] compound page: default destructor Hugh Dickins
2006-02-12 19:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] compound page: no access_process_vm check Hugh Dickins
2006-02-12 21:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] compound page: use page[1].lru Andrew Morton
2006-02-13 0:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-13 2:13 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-13 7:05 ` David S. Miller
2006-02-13 7:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-13 7:59 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0602121943150.15774@goblin.wat.veritas.com \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®