From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement slub fastpath in terms of freebase and freeoffset
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:57:02 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802281648510.1954@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080228232507.GB20319@Krystal>
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> static inline void set_freelist_ptr(struct kmem_cache_cpu *c, void **freelist)
> {
> unsigned long offset;
>
> offset = c->freeoffset + c->off_mask + 1;
> offset &= ~c->off_mask;
> offset |= (unsigned long)freelist & c->off_mask;
> c->freeoffset = offset;
> }
>
> Which will insure c->freeoffset is always in a valid state, therefore
> allowing interrupts to nest over it.
Ok.
> Should be ok now since we allow interrupts to nest over
> set_freelist_ptr. But I think this is also protected by slab_lock, taken
> both in the slow path and in deactivate_slab.
The slab locks can only be taken with interrupts disabled.
> In any case, doing a
>
> object = get_freelist_ptr(c);
> set_freelist_ptr(c, object[c->offset]);
>
> Like deactivate_slab does should be either protected by disabling
> interrupts or by the slab_lock. Am I right ?
Correct.
> Ah! I think I found the issue. It should become :
>
>
> newoffset = freeoffset;
> newoffset &= ~c->off_mask;
> newoffset |= (unsigned long)(object[c->offset]) & c->off_mask;
> } while (cmpxchg_local(&c->freeoffset, freeoffset, newoffset)
> != freeoffset);
Looks okay.
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/mm/slub.c 2008-02-27 20:41:14.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/mm/slub.c 2008-02-28 18:22:14.000000000 -0500
> @@ -138,6 +138,22 @@ static inline void ClearSlabDebug(struct
> page->flags &= ~SLABDEBUG;
> }
>
> +static inline void **get_freelist_ptr(struct kmem_cache_cpu *c)
> +{
> + return (void **)((unsigned long)page_address(c->page)
> + | (c->freeoffset & c->off_mask));
> +}
Hmmmm... page_address() is an expensive operation.
> @@ -1636,28 +1652,48 @@ static __always_inline void *slab_alloc(
> */
>
> #ifdef SLUB_FASTPATH
> + unsigned long freeoffset, newoffset;
> +
> c = get_cpu_slab(s, raw_smp_processor_id());
> do {
> - object = c->freelist;
> - if (unlikely(is_end(object) || !node_match(c, node))) {
> + freeoffset = c->freeoffset;
> + /*
> + * If c->page is changed, freeoffset _must_ have its
> + * counter incremented.
> + * read freeoffset before c->page (wrt interrupts).
> + */
> + barrier();
> + if (unlikely(is_end(freeoffset) || !node_match(c, node))) {
> object = __slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, addr, c);
> break;
> }
> + object = (void **)((unsigned long)page_address(c->page)
Expensive op page_address().
> @@ -1779,21 +1815,21 @@ static __always_inline void slab_free(st
> struct kmem_cache_cpu *c;
>
> #ifdef SLUB_FASTPATH
> - void **freelist;
> + unsigned long freeoffset, newoffset;
>
> c = get_cpu_slab(s, raw_smp_processor_id());
> debug_check_no_locks_freed(object, s->objsize);
> do {
> - freelist = c->freelist;
> + freeoffset = c->freeoffset;
> barrier();
> /*
> * If the compiler would reorder the retrieval of c->page to
> - * come before c->freelist then an interrupt could
> - * change the cpu slab before we retrieve c->freelist. We
> - * could be matching on a page no longer active and put the
> - * object onto the freelist of the wrong slab.
> + * come before c->freeoffset then an interrupt could change the
> + * cpu slab before we retrieve c->freelist. We could be matching
> + * on a page no longer active and put the object onto the
> + * freelist of the wrong slab.
> *
> - * On the other hand: If we already have the freelist pointer
> + * On the other hand: If we already have the freeoffset
> * then any change of cpu_slab will cause the cmpxchg to fail
> * since the freelist pointers are unique per slab.
> */
> @@ -1801,9 +1837,15 @@ static __always_inline void slab_free(st
> __slab_free(s, page, x, addr, c->offset);
> break;
> }
> - object[c->offset] = freelist;
> + object[c->offset] =
> + (void **)((unsigned long)page_address(c->page) |
> + (freeoffset & c->off_mask));
> stat(c, FREE_FASTPATH);
> - } while (cmpxchg_local(&c->freelist, freelist, object) != freelist);
> + newoffset = freeoffset + PAGE_SIZE;
> + newoffset &= ~c->off_mask;
> + newoffset |= (unsigned long)object & c->off_mask;
> + } while (cmpxchg_local(&c->freeoffset, freeoffset, newoffset)
> + != freeoffset);
Hmmm.. The cmpxchg_local was intended to check for a change of slab too
(addresses from different slabs are disjunct).
That is no longer possible since the upper bits are used by the
versioning? (Same issue in slab_alloc).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-15 21:23 Linux 2.6.25-rc2 Linus Torvalds
2008-02-16 2:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-16 5:44 ` [BUG] Linux 2.6.25-rc2 - Kernel Ooops while running dbench Kamalesh Babulal
2008-02-18 12:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-18 14:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-18 16:11 ` Frans Pop
2008-03-03 11:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-04 4:03 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-02-16 6:10 ` [BUG] Linux 2.6.25-rc2 - Regression from 2.6.24-rc1-git1 softlockup while bootup on powerpc Kamalesh Babulal
2008-02-17 19:29 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-19 8:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-02-19 8:36 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-19 8:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-02-19 8:58 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-19 9:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-02-19 9:09 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-19 9:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-02-19 9:01 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-19 13:19 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-02-22 7:24 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-22 7:40 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-17 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-16 16:52 ` Linux 2.6.25-rc2 Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-16 19:14 ` Linux 2.6.25-rc2 regression: LVM cannot find volume group Tilman Schmidt
2008-02-16 20:12 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-16 22:37 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-02-18 0:57 ` Tilman Schmidt
2008-02-18 1:22 ` Jeff Chua
2008-02-18 10:35 ` Tilman Schmidt
2008-02-19 1:53 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-02-19 8:56 ` Tilman Schmidt
2008-02-16 21:38 ` Linux 2.6.25-rc2 Torsten Kaiser
2008-02-17 20:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-17 21:32 ` Torsten Kaiser
2008-02-18 23:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-19 6:44 ` Torsten Kaiser
2008-02-19 6:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 6:54 ` Torsten Kaiser
2008-02-19 7:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-02-19 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 10:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-02-19 13:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-19 14:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 14:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-19 14:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-02-19 14:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-02-19 14:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 14:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 15:54 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-02-19 15:52 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-02-20 0:36 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-02-20 2:08 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-02-20 6:53 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-02-20 7:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-02-19 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-19 16:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 16:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 19:27 ` Torsten Kaiser
2008-02-19 20:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-27 23:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 1:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-28 2:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-28 11:15 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-28 11:13 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-02-19 16:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-02-19 16:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-19 20:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-27 23:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 5:55 ` [PATCH] Implement slub fastpath in terms of freebase and freeoffset Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-28 19:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 23:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-29 0:57 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2008-02-29 1:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-29 2:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 3:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-29 5:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 13:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-02-29 19:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 13:28 ` [PATCH] Slub Freeoffset check overflow Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-03-04 6:17 ` [PATCH] Slub Freeoffset check overflow (updated) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-03-04 7:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 23:32 ` Linux 2.6.25-rc2 Christoph Lameter
2008-02-19 18:39 ` Torsten Kaiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0802281648510.1954@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=just.for.lkml@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®