mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] Remove current_tick_length()
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:18:24 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803150511580.1791@scrub.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1205552909.6122.63.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Hi,

On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, john stultz wrote:

> > Why would someone do something silly like this?
> 
> Its not a huge deal, but we've seen globally scoped timekeeping
> variables misused either accidentally or intentionally. Awhile back ppc
> was corrupting time_offset by using it for a timezone offset value. 
> 
> So I think its a valid maintainability issue.

ppc used to do a whole lot more than that, so I don't think that counts as 
a valid example.
tick_length is overwritten at every timer and modifying it would have 
barely any effect compared to other values which are already exported.

> > > Is there any additional rational for this change?
> > 
> > Useless bloat?
> 
> I agree its a trade off. But do you have performance numbers to make the
> maintainability trade off worth it? (I admit, it is used in the
> timer_interrupt, so it may very well be worth it, but we might want to
> check first).

It depends on the architecture, but it's effects regularly executed code 
and every byte counts.

bye, Roman

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-15  4:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-14 18:40 [PATCH 0/8] NTP updates zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/8] cleanup ntp.c zippel
2008-03-14 20:30   ` john stultz
2008-03-15  3:21     ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/8] NTP4 user space bits update zippel
2008-03-14 20:36   ` john stultz
2008-03-15  3:29     ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 3/8] increase time_freq resolution zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 4/8] increase time_offset resolution zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5/8] support for TAI zippel
2008-03-14 20:55   ` john stultz
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 6/8] Rename TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT to NTP_SCALE_SHIFT zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 7/8] Remove current_tick_length() zippel
2008-03-15  2:41   ` john stultz
2008-03-15  3:32     ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-15  3:48       ` john stultz
2008-03-15  4:18         ` Roman Zippel [this message]
2008-03-15 16:29           ` Ray Lee
2008-03-15 17:14             ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-18  1:01               ` john stultz
2008-03-26  1:53                 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 8/8] handle leap second via timer zippel
2008-03-14 20:24   ` john stultz
2008-03-15  3:18     ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-17 22:18       ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-21 14:15         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-14 23:03 ` [PATCH 0/8] NTP updates john stultz
2008-03-15  3:15   ` Roman Zippel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0803150511580.1791@scrub.home \
    --to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®