From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, namhyung@kernel.org,
jolsa@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/49] Add Alder Lake support for perf
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 12:14:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEISfS9rDU1+FJ44@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEEdyMdzKdDKIvmp@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 06:50:00PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 10:50:45AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Could you please take a look at the perf kernel patches (3-25)?
> >
> > By now, we have got some comments regarding the generic hybrid feature
> > enumeration code and perf tool patches. I would appreciate it very much if
> > you could comment on the perf kernel patches.
> >
>
> Yeah, I started staring at it yesterday.. I'll try and respond tomorrow.
OK, so STYLE IS HORRIBLE, please surrender your CAPS-LOCK key until
further notice.
The below is a completely unfinished 'diff' against 3-20. It has various
notes interspersed.
Please rework.
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -44,11 +44,13 @@
#include "perf_event.h"
+static struct pmu pmu;
+
struct x86_pmu x86_pmu __read_mostly;
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_hw_events, cpu_hw_events) = {
.enabled = 1,
- .hybrid_pmu_idx = X86_NON_HYBRID_PMU,
+ .pmu = &pmu;
};
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(rdpmc_never_available_key);
@@ -184,7 +186,7 @@ static inline int get_possible_num_count
{
int bit, num_counters = 0;
- if (!IS_X86_HYBRID)
+ if (!is_hybrid())
return x86_pmu.num_counters;
for_each_set_bit(bit, &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu_bitmap, X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX)
@@ -270,6 +272,9 @@ bool check_hw_exists(int num_counters, i
if (ret)
goto msr_fail;
for (i = 0; i < num_counters_fixed; i++) {
+ /*
+ * XXX comment that explains why/how NULL below works.
+ */
if (fixed_counter_disabled(i, NULL))
continue;
if (val & (0x03 << i*4)) {
@@ -352,7 +357,6 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hw
{
struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
unsigned int cache_type, cache_op, cache_result;
- struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu = IS_X86_HYBRID ? container_of(event->pmu, struct x86_hybrid_pmu, pmu) : NULL;
u64 config, val;
config = attr->config;
@@ -372,10 +376,7 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hw
return -EINVAL;
cache_result = array_index_nospec(cache_result, PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX);
- if (pmu)
- val = pmu->hw_cache_event_ids[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
- else
- val = hw_cache_event_ids[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
+ val = hybrid(event->pmu, hw_cache_event_ids)[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
if (val == 0)
return -ENOENT;
@@ -384,10 +385,7 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hw
return -EINVAL;
hwc->config |= val;
- if (pmu)
- attr->config1 = pmu->hw_cache_extra_regs[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
- else
- attr->config1 = hw_cache_extra_regs[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
+ attr->config1 = hybrid(event->pmu, hw_cache_extra_regs)[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
return x86_pmu_extra_regs(val, event);
}
@@ -742,13 +740,11 @@ void x86_pmu_enable_all(int added)
}
}
-static struct pmu pmu;
-
static inline int is_x86_event(struct perf_event *event)
{
int bit;
- if (!IS_X86_HYBRID)
+ if (!is_hybrid())
return event->pmu == &pmu;
for_each_set_bit(bit, &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu_bitmap, X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX) {
@@ -760,6 +756,7 @@ static inline int is_x86_event(struct pe
struct pmu *x86_get_pmu(void)
{
+ /* borken */
return &pmu;
}
/*
@@ -963,7 +960,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_assign_events);
int x86_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n, int *assign)
{
- int num_counters = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(num_counters, cpuc);
+ int num_counters = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, num_counters);
struct event_constraint *c;
struct perf_event *e;
int n0, i, wmin, wmax, unsched = 0;
@@ -1124,7 +1121,7 @@ static void del_nr_metric_event(struct c
static int collect_event(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
int max_count, int n)
{
- union perf_capabilities intel_cap = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(intel_cap, cpuc);
+ union perf_capabilities intel_cap = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_cap);
if (intel_cap.perf_metrics && add_nr_metric_event(cpuc, event))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1147,8 +1144,8 @@ static int collect_event(struct cpu_hw_e
*/
static int collect_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *leader, bool dogrp)
{
- int num_counters = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(num_counters, cpuc);
- int num_counters_fixed = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(num_counters_fixed, cpuc);
+ int num_counters = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, num_counters);
+ int num_counters_fixed = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, num_counters_fixed);
struct perf_event *event;
int n, max_count;
@@ -1522,9 +1519,9 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
u64 pebs, debugctl;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
- int num_counters = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(num_counters, cpuc);
- int num_counters_fixed = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(num_counters_fixed, cpuc);
- struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(pebs_constraints, cpuc);
+ int num_counters = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, num_counters);
+ int num_counters_fixed = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, num_counters_fixed);
+ struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, pebs_constraints);
unsigned long flags;
int idx;
@@ -1605,7 +1602,7 @@ void x86_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *eve
static void x86_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
- union perf_capabilities intel_cap = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(intel_cap, cpuc);
+ union perf_capabilities intel_cap = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_cap);
int i;
/*
@@ -2105,7 +2102,7 @@ static int __init init_hw_perf_events(vo
pmu.attr_update = x86_pmu.attr_update;
- if (!IS_X86_HYBRID) {
+ if (!is_hybrid()) {
x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap(x86_pmu.num_counters,
x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed,
x86_pmu.intel_ctrl);
@@ -2139,7 +2136,7 @@ static int __init init_hw_perf_events(vo
if (err)
goto out1;
- if (!IS_X86_HYBRID) {
+ if (!is_hybrid()) {
err = perf_pmu_register(&pmu, "cpu", PERF_TYPE_RAW);
if (err)
goto out2;
@@ -2303,7 +2300,11 @@ static struct cpu_hw_events *allocate_fa
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
cpuc->is_fake = 1;
- if (IS_X86_HYBRID)
+ /*
+ * Utterly broken, this selects a random pmu to validate on;
+ * it should match event->pmu.
+ */
+ if (is_hybrid())
cpuc->hybrid_pmu_idx = x86_hybrid_get_idx_from_cpu(cpu);
else
cpuc->hybrid_pmu_idx = X86_NON_HYBRID_PMU;
@@ -2362,8 +2363,10 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_ev
/*
* Reject events from different hybrid PMUs.
+ *
+ * This is just flat out buggered.
*/
- if (IS_X86_HYBRID) {
+ if (is_hybrid()) {
struct perf_event *sibling;
struct pmu *pmu = NULL;
@@ -2380,6 +2383,26 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_ev
if (pmu && pmu != event->pmu)
return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Maybe something like so..
+ */
+
+ struct perf_event *sibling;
+ struct pmu *pmu = NULL;
+
+ if (is_x86_event(leader))
+ pmu = leader->pmu;
+
+ for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader) {
+ if (!is_x86_event(sibling))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!pmu)
+ pmu = sibling->pmu;
+ else if (pmu != sibling->pmu)
+ return ret;
+ }
}
fake_cpuc = allocate_fake_cpuc();
@@ -2418,7 +2441,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_event_init(struct per
(event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE))
return -ENOENT;
- if (IS_X86_HYBRID && (event->cpu != -1)) {
+ if (is_hybrid() && (event->cpu != -1)) {
hybrid_pmu = container_of(event->pmu, struct x86_hybrid_pmu, pmu);
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &hybrid_pmu->supported_cpus))
return -ENOENT;
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3168,7 +3168,7 @@ struct event_constraint *
x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
struct perf_event *event)
{
- struct event_constraint *event_constraints = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(event_constraints, cpuc);
+ struct event_constraint *event_constraints = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, event_constraints);
struct event_constraint *c;
if (event_constraints) {
@@ -3180,10 +3180,10 @@ x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_
}
}
- if (!HAS_VALID_HYBRID_PMU_IN_CPUC(cpuc))
+ if (!is_hybrid() || !cpuc->pmu)
return &unconstrained;
- return &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[cpuc->hybrid_pmu_idx].unconstrained;
+ return hybrid_pmu(cpuc->pmu)->unconstrained;
}
static struct event_constraint *
@@ -3691,7 +3691,7 @@ static inline bool intel_pmu_has_cap(str
{
struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu;
- if (!IS_X86_HYBRID)
+ if (!is_hybrid())
return test_bit(idx, (unsigned long *)&x86_pmu.intel_cap.capabilities);
pmu = container_of(event->pmu, struct x86_hybrid_pmu, pmu);
@@ -4224,7 +4224,7 @@ int intel_cpuc_prepare(struct cpu_hw_eve
{
cpuc->pebs_record_size = x86_pmu.pebs_record_size;
- if (IS_X86_HYBRID || x86_pmu.extra_regs || x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map) {
+ if (is_hybrid() || x86_pmu.extra_regs || x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map) {
cpuc->shared_regs = allocate_shared_regs(cpu);
if (!cpuc->shared_regs)
goto err;
@@ -4377,8 +4377,8 @@ static void init_hybrid_pmu(int cpu)
if (!test_bit(idx, &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu_bitmap))
return;
- cpuc->hybrid_pmu_idx = idx;
pmu = &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[idx];
+ cpuc->pmu = &pmu.pmu;
/* Only register PMU for the first CPU */
if (!cpumask_empty(&pmu->supported_cpus)) {
@@ -4451,7 +4451,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int c
int core_id = topology_core_id(cpu);
int i;
- if (IS_X86_HYBRID)
+ if (is_hybrid())
init_hybrid_pmu(cpu);
init_debug_store_on_cpu(cpu);
@@ -4480,7 +4480,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int c
* feature for now. The corresponding bit should always be 0 on
* a hybrid platform, e.g., Alder Lake.
*/
- if (!IS_X86_HYBRID && x86_pmu.intel_cap.perf_metrics) {
+ if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.perf_metrics) {
union perf_capabilities perf_cap;
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, perf_cap.capabilities);
@@ -4569,7 +4569,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu)
{
intel_cpuc_finish(&per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu));
- if (IS_X86_HYBRID) {
+ if (is_hybrid()) {
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
int idx = x86_hybrid_get_idx_from_cpu(cpu);
struct x86_hybrid_pmu *hybrid_pmu;
@@ -4579,7 +4579,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu)
hybrid_pmu = &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[idx];
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &hybrid_pmu->supported_cpus);
- cpuc->hybrid_pmu_idx = X86_NON_HYBRID_PMU;
+ cpuc->pmu = NULL;
if (cpumask_empty(&hybrid_pmu->supported_cpus)) {
perf_pmu_unregister(&hybrid_pmu->pmu);
hybrid_pmu->pmu.type = -1;
@@ -6217,7 +6217,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
snprintf(pmu_name_str, sizeof(pmu_name_str), "%s", name);
- if (!IS_X86_HYBRID) {
+ if (!is_hybrid()) {
group_events_td.attrs = td_attr;
group_events_mem.attrs = mem_attr;
group_events_tsx.attrs = tsx_attr;
@@ -6273,7 +6273,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
pr_cont("full-width counters, ");
}
- if (!IS_X86_HYBRID && x86_pmu.intel_cap.perf_metrics)
+ if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.perf_metrics)
x86_pmu.intel_ctrl |= 1ULL << GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
return 0;
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -2217,7 +2217,7 @@ void __init intel_ds_init(void)
}
pr_cont("PEBS fmt4%c%s, ", pebs_type, pebs_qual);
- if (!IS_X86_HYBRID && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
+ if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT, ");
x86_get_pmu()->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
}
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
/*
* Hybrid PMU support
*/
- int hybrid_pmu_idx;
+ struct pmu *pmu;
};
#define __EVENT_CONSTRAINT_RANGE(c, e, n, m, w, o, f) { \
@@ -671,21 +671,30 @@ struct x86_hybrid_pmu {
struct extra_reg *extra_regs;
};
-#define IS_X86_HYBRID cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HYBRID_CPU)
-
-#define HAS_VALID_HYBRID_PMU_IN_CPUC(_cpuc) \
- (IS_X86_HYBRID && \
- ((_cpuc)->hybrid_pmu_idx >= X86_HYBRID_PMU_ATOM_IDX) && \
- ((_cpuc)->hybrid_pmu_idx < X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX))
+static __always_inline bool is_hybrid(void)
+{
+ return unlikely(cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HYBRID_CPU));
+}
-#define X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(_name, _cpuc) \
- (_cpuc && HAS_VALID_HYBRID_PMU_IN_CPUC(_cpuc) ? x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[(_cpuc)->hybrid_pmu_idx]._name : x86_pmu._name)
+static __always_inline bool is_hybrid_idx(int idx)
+{
+ return (unsigned)idx < X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX;
+}
-#define X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_EVENT(_name, _event) \
- (IS_X86_HYBRID ? ((struct x86_hybrid_pmu *)(_event->pmu))->_name : x86_pmu._name)
+static __always_inline struct x86_hybrid_pmu *hybrid_pmu(struct pmu *)
+{
+ return container_of(pmu, struct x86_hybrid_pmu, pmu);
+}
-#define IS_VALID_HYBRID_PMU_IDX(idx) \
- (idx < X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX && idx > X86_NON_HYBRID_PMU)
+#define hybrid(_pmu, _field) \
+({ \
+ typeof(x86_pmu._field) __F = x86_pmu._field; \
+ \
+ if (is_hybrid() && (_pmu)) \
+ __F = hybrid_pmu(_pmu)->_field; \
+ \
+ __F; \
+})
static inline enum x86_hybrid_pmu_type_idx
x86_hybrid_get_idx_from_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -898,9 +907,12 @@ struct x86_pmu {
* for all PMUs. The hybrid_pmu only includes the unique capabilities.
* The hybrid_pmu_bitmap is the bits map of the possible hybrid_pmu.
*/
+ int (*filter_match)(struct perf_event *event);
unsigned long hybrid_pmu_bitmap;
+ /*
+ * This thing is huge, use dynamic allocation!
+ */
struct x86_hybrid_pmu hybrid_pmu[X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX];
- int (*filter_match)(struct perf_event *event);
};
struct x86_perf_task_context_opt {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-05 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 15:24 kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:24 ` [PATCH 01/49] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate Intel Hybrid Technology feature bit kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:24 ` [PATCH 02/49] x86/cpu: Describe hybrid CPUs in cpuinfo_x86 kan.liang
2021-02-08 17:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-08 19:04 ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-08 19:10 ` Luck, Tony
2021-02-08 19:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 03/49] perf/x86/intel: Hybrid PMU support for perf capabilities kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 04/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for intel_ctrl kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 05/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for counters kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 06/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for unconstrained kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 07/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for hardware cache event kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 08/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for event constraints kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 09/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for extra_regs kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 10/49] perf/x86/intel: Factor out intel_pmu_check_num_counters kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 11/49] perf/x86/intel: Factor out intel_pmu_check_event_constraints kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 12/49] perf/x86/intel: Factor out intel_pmu_check_extra_regs kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 13/49] perf/x86: Expose check_hw_exists kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 14/49] perf/x86: Remove temporary pmu assignment in event_init kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 15/49] perf/x86: Factor out x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 16/49] perf/x86: Register hybrid PMUs kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 17/49] perf/x86: Add structures for the attributes of Hybrid PMUs kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 18/49] perf/x86/intel: Add attr_update for " kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 19/49] perf/x86: Support filter_match callback kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 20/49] perf/x86/intel: Add Alder Lake Hybrid support kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 21/49] perf: Introduce PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE_PMU and PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE_PMU kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 22/49] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Alder Lake support kan.liang
2021-02-09 4:18 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 23/49] perf/x86/msr: Add Alder Lake CPU support kan.liang
2021-02-09 3:58 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-09 13:44 ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-09 5:15 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 24/49] perf/x86/cstate: " kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 25/49] perf/x86/rapl: Add support for Intel Alder Lake kan.liang
2021-02-09 5:16 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 26/49] perf jevents: Support unit value "cpu_core" and "cpu_atom" kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 27/49] perf util: Save pmu name to struct perf_pmu_alias kan.liang
2021-02-08 18:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09 0:17 ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 28/49] perf pmu: Save detected hybrid pmus to a global pmu list kan.liang
2021-02-08 18:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09 0:05 ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 29/49] perf pmu: Add hybrid helper functions kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 30/49] perf list: Support --cputype option to list hybrid pmu events kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 31/49] perf stat: Hybrid evsel uses its own cpus kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 32/49] perf header: Support HYBRID_TOPOLOGY feature kan.liang
2021-02-08 19:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09 0:26 ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 33/49] perf header: Support hybrid CPU_PMU_CAPS kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 34/49] tools headers uapi: Update tools's copy of linux/perf_event.h kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 35/49] perf parse-events: Create two hybrid hardware events kan.liang
2021-02-08 18:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09 0:23 ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 36/49] perf parse-events: Create two hybrid cache events kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 37/49] perf parse-events: Support hardware events inside PMU kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 38/49] perf list: Display pmu prefix for partially supported hybrid cache events kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 39/49] perf parse-events: Support hybrid raw events kan.liang
2021-02-08 19:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09 0:28 ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 40/49] perf stat: Support --cputype option for hybrid events kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 41/49] perf stat: Support metrics with " kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 42/49] perf evlist: Create two hybrid 'cycles' events by default kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 43/49] perf stat: Add default hybrid events kan.liang
2021-02-08 19:10 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09 0:36 ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 44/49] perf stat: Uniquify hybrid event name kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 45/49] perf stat: Merge event counts from all hybrid PMUs kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 46/49] perf stat: Filter out unmatched aggregation for hybrid event kan.liang
2021-02-08 19:16 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09 0:53 ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 47/49] perf evlist: Warn as events from different hybrid PMUs in a group kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 48/49] perf Documentation: Document intel-hybrid support kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 49/49] perf evsel: Adjust hybrid event and global event mixed group kan.liang
2021-02-08 19:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09 0:47 ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-11 11:40 ` [PATCH 00/49] Add Alder Lake support for perf Jiri Olsa
2021-02-11 16:22 ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-18 0:07 ` Jin, Yao
2021-03-04 15:50 ` Liang, Kan
2021-03-04 17:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-05 11:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-03-05 13:36 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YEISfS9rDU1+FJ44@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®