mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, namhyung@kernel.org,
	jolsa@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/49] Add Alder Lake support for perf
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:36:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6b05e33-d4c8-8a05-ff06-ec86a50d0e4a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEISfS9rDU1+FJ44@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>



On 3/5/2021 6:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 06:50:00PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 10:50:45AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> Could you please take a look at the perf kernel patches (3-25)?
>>>
>>> By now, we have got some comments regarding the generic hybrid feature
>>> enumeration code and perf tool patches. I would appreciate it very much if
>>> you could comment on the perf kernel patches.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I started staring at it yesterday.. I'll try and respond tomorrow.
> 
> OK, so STYLE IS HORRIBLE, please surrender your CAPS-LOCK key until
> further notice.
> 
> The below is a completely unfinished 'diff' against 3-20. It has various
> notes interspersed.
> 
> Please rework.


Thanks for the detailed comments. I will rework the code accordingly.

Thanks,
Kan

> 
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -44,11 +44,13 @@
>   
>   #include "perf_event.h"
>   
> +static struct pmu pmu;
> +
>   struct x86_pmu x86_pmu __read_mostly;
>   
>   DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_hw_events, cpu_hw_events) = {
>   	.enabled = 1,
> -	.hybrid_pmu_idx = X86_NON_HYBRID_PMU,
> +	.pmu = &pmu;
>   };
>   
>   DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(rdpmc_never_available_key);
> @@ -184,7 +186,7 @@ static inline int get_possible_num_count
>   {
>   	int bit, num_counters = 0;
>   
> -	if (!IS_X86_HYBRID)
> +	if (!is_hybrid())
>   		return x86_pmu.num_counters;
>   
>   	for_each_set_bit(bit, &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu_bitmap, X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX)
> @@ -270,6 +272,9 @@ bool check_hw_exists(int num_counters, i
>   		if (ret)
>   			goto msr_fail;
>   		for (i = 0; i < num_counters_fixed; i++) {
> +			/*
> +			 * XXX comment that explains why/how NULL below works.
> +			 */
>   			if (fixed_counter_disabled(i, NULL))
>   				continue;
>   			if (val & (0x03 << i*4)) {
> @@ -352,7 +357,6 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hw
>   {
>   	struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
>   	unsigned int cache_type, cache_op, cache_result;
> -	struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu = IS_X86_HYBRID ? container_of(event->pmu, struct x86_hybrid_pmu, pmu) : NULL;
>   	u64 config, val;
>   
>   	config = attr->config;
> @@ -372,10 +376,7 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hw
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	cache_result = array_index_nospec(cache_result, PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX);
>   
> -	if (pmu)
> -		val = pmu->hw_cache_event_ids[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
> -	else
> -		val = hw_cache_event_ids[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
> +	val = hybrid(event->pmu, hw_cache_event_ids)[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
>   
>   	if (val == 0)
>   		return -ENOENT;
> @@ -384,10 +385,7 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hw
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
>   	hwc->config |= val;
> -	if (pmu)
> -		attr->config1 = pmu->hw_cache_extra_regs[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
> -	else
> -		attr->config1 = hw_cache_extra_regs[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
> +	attr->config1 = hybrid(event->pmu, hw_cache_extra_regs)[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
>   	return x86_pmu_extra_regs(val, event);
>   }
>   
> @@ -742,13 +740,11 @@ void x86_pmu_enable_all(int added)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -static struct pmu pmu;
> -
>   static inline int is_x86_event(struct perf_event *event)
>   {
>   	int bit;
>   
> -	if (!IS_X86_HYBRID)
> +	if (!is_hybrid())
>   		return event->pmu == &pmu;
>   
>   	for_each_set_bit(bit, &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu_bitmap, X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX) {
> @@ -760,6 +756,7 @@ static inline int is_x86_event(struct pe
>   
>   struct pmu *x86_get_pmu(void)
>   {
> +	/* borken */
>   	return &pmu;
>   }
>   /*
> @@ -963,7 +960,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_assign_events);
>   
>   int x86_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n, int *assign)
>   {
> -	int num_counters = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(num_counters, cpuc);
> +	int num_counters = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, num_counters);
>   	struct event_constraint *c;
>   	struct perf_event *e;
>   	int n0, i, wmin, wmax, unsched = 0;
> @@ -1124,7 +1121,7 @@ static void del_nr_metric_event(struct c
>   static int collect_event(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
>   			 int max_count, int n)
>   {
> -	union perf_capabilities intel_cap = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(intel_cap, cpuc);
> +	union perf_capabilities intel_cap = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_cap);
>   
>   	if (intel_cap.perf_metrics && add_nr_metric_event(cpuc, event))
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1147,8 +1144,8 @@ static int collect_event(struct cpu_hw_e
>    */
>   static int collect_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *leader, bool dogrp)
>   {
> -	int num_counters = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(num_counters, cpuc);
> -	int num_counters_fixed = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(num_counters_fixed, cpuc);
> +	int num_counters = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, num_counters);
> +	int num_counters_fixed = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, num_counters_fixed);
>   	struct perf_event *event;
>   	int n, max_count;
>   
> @@ -1522,9 +1519,9 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
>   	u64 pebs, debugctl;
>   	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>   	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
> -	int num_counters = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(num_counters, cpuc);
> -	int num_counters_fixed = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(num_counters_fixed, cpuc);
> -	struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(pebs_constraints, cpuc);
> +	int num_counters = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, num_counters);
> +	int num_counters_fixed = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, num_counters_fixed);
> +	struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, pebs_constraints);
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   	int idx;
>   
> @@ -1605,7 +1602,7 @@ void x86_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *eve
>   static void x86_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>   {
>   	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> -	union perf_capabilities intel_cap = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(intel_cap, cpuc);
> +	union perf_capabilities intel_cap = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_cap);
>   	int i;
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -2105,7 +2102,7 @@ static int __init init_hw_perf_events(vo
>   
>   	pmu.attr_update = x86_pmu.attr_update;
>   
> -	if (!IS_X86_HYBRID) {
> +	if (!is_hybrid()) {
>   		x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap(x86_pmu.num_counters,
>   				     x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed,
>   				     x86_pmu.intel_ctrl);
> @@ -2139,7 +2136,7 @@ static int __init init_hw_perf_events(vo
>   	if (err)
>   		goto out1;
>   
> -	if (!IS_X86_HYBRID) {
> +	if (!is_hybrid()) {
>   		err = perf_pmu_register(&pmu, "cpu", PERF_TYPE_RAW);
>   		if (err)
>   			goto out2;
> @@ -2303,7 +2300,11 @@ static struct cpu_hw_events *allocate_fa
>   		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>   	cpuc->is_fake = 1;
>   
> -	if (IS_X86_HYBRID)
> +	/*
> +	 * Utterly broken, this selects a random pmu to validate on;
> +	 * it should match event->pmu.
> +	 */
> +	if (is_hybrid())
>   		cpuc->hybrid_pmu_idx = x86_hybrid_get_idx_from_cpu(cpu);
>   	else
>   		cpuc->hybrid_pmu_idx = X86_NON_HYBRID_PMU;
> @@ -2362,8 +2363,10 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_ev
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Reject events from different hybrid PMUs.
> +	 *
> +	 * This is just flat out buggered.
>   	 */
> -	if (IS_X86_HYBRID) {
> +	if (is_hybrid()) {
>   		struct perf_event *sibling;
>   		struct pmu *pmu = NULL;
>   
> @@ -2380,6 +2383,26 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_ev
>   
>   		if (pmu && pmu != event->pmu)
>   			return ret;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Maybe something like so..
> +		 */
> +
> +		struct perf_event *sibling;
> +		struct pmu *pmu = NULL;
> +
> +		if (is_x86_event(leader))
> +			pmu = leader->pmu;
> +
> +		for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader) {
> +			if (!is_x86_event(sibling))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			if (!pmu)
> +				pmu = sibling->pmu;
> +			else if (pmu != sibling->pmu)
> +				return ret;
> +		}
>   	}
>   
>   	fake_cpuc = allocate_fake_cpuc();
> @@ -2418,7 +2441,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_event_init(struct per
>   	    (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE))
>   		return -ENOENT;
>   
> -	if (IS_X86_HYBRID && (event->cpu != -1)) {
> +	if (is_hybrid() && (event->cpu != -1)) {
>   		hybrid_pmu = container_of(event->pmu, struct x86_hybrid_pmu, pmu);
>   		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &hybrid_pmu->supported_cpus))
>   			return -ENOENT;
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3168,7 +3168,7 @@ struct event_constraint *
>   x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
>   			  struct perf_event *event)
>   {
> -	struct event_constraint *event_constraints = X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(event_constraints, cpuc);
> +	struct event_constraint *event_constraints = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, event_constraints);
>   	struct event_constraint *c;
>   
>   	if (event_constraints) {
> @@ -3180,10 +3180,10 @@ x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	if (!HAS_VALID_HYBRID_PMU_IN_CPUC(cpuc))
> +	if (!is_hybrid() || !cpuc->pmu)
>   		return &unconstrained;
>   
> -	return &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[cpuc->hybrid_pmu_idx].unconstrained;
> +	return hybrid_pmu(cpuc->pmu)->unconstrained;
>   }
>   
>   static struct event_constraint *
> @@ -3691,7 +3691,7 @@ static inline bool intel_pmu_has_cap(str
>   {
>   	struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu;
>   
> -	if (!IS_X86_HYBRID)
> +	if (!is_hybrid())
>   		return test_bit(idx, (unsigned long *)&x86_pmu.intel_cap.capabilities);
>   
>   	pmu = container_of(event->pmu, struct x86_hybrid_pmu, pmu);
> @@ -4224,7 +4224,7 @@ int intel_cpuc_prepare(struct cpu_hw_eve
>   {
>   	cpuc->pebs_record_size = x86_pmu.pebs_record_size;
>   
> -	if (IS_X86_HYBRID || x86_pmu.extra_regs || x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map) {
> +	if (is_hybrid() || x86_pmu.extra_regs || x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map) {
>   		cpuc->shared_regs = allocate_shared_regs(cpu);
>   		if (!cpuc->shared_regs)
>   			goto err;
> @@ -4377,8 +4377,8 @@ static void init_hybrid_pmu(int cpu)
>   	if (!test_bit(idx, &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu_bitmap))
>   		return;
>   
> -	cpuc->hybrid_pmu_idx = idx;
>   	pmu = &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[idx];
> +	cpuc->pmu = &pmu.pmu;
>   
>   	/* Only register PMU for the first CPU */
>   	if (!cpumask_empty(&pmu->supported_cpus)) {
> @@ -4451,7 +4451,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int c
>   	int core_id = topology_core_id(cpu);
>   	int i;
>   
> -	if (IS_X86_HYBRID)
> +	if (is_hybrid())
>   		init_hybrid_pmu(cpu);
>   
>   	init_debug_store_on_cpu(cpu);
> @@ -4480,7 +4480,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int c
>   	 * feature for now. The corresponding bit should always be 0 on
>   	 * a hybrid platform, e.g., Alder Lake.
>   	 */
> -	if (!IS_X86_HYBRID && x86_pmu.intel_cap.perf_metrics) {
> +	if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.perf_metrics) {
>   		union perf_capabilities perf_cap;
>   
>   		rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, perf_cap.capabilities);
> @@ -4569,7 +4569,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu)
>   {
>   	intel_cpuc_finish(&per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu));
>   
> -	if (IS_X86_HYBRID) {
> +	if (is_hybrid()) {
>   		struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
>   		int idx = x86_hybrid_get_idx_from_cpu(cpu);
>   		struct x86_hybrid_pmu *hybrid_pmu;
> @@ -4579,7 +4579,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu)
>   
>   		hybrid_pmu = &x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[idx];
>   		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &hybrid_pmu->supported_cpus);
> -		cpuc->hybrid_pmu_idx = X86_NON_HYBRID_PMU;
> +		cpuc->pmu = NULL;
>   		if (cpumask_empty(&hybrid_pmu->supported_cpus)) {
>   			perf_pmu_unregister(&hybrid_pmu->pmu);
>   			hybrid_pmu->pmu.type = -1;
> @@ -6217,7 +6217,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>   
>   	snprintf(pmu_name_str, sizeof(pmu_name_str), "%s", name);
>   
> -	if (!IS_X86_HYBRID) {
> +	if (!is_hybrid()) {
>   		group_events_td.attrs  = td_attr;
>   		group_events_mem.attrs = mem_attr;
>   		group_events_tsx.attrs = tsx_attr;
> @@ -6273,7 +6273,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>   		pr_cont("full-width counters, ");
>   	}
>   
> -	if (!IS_X86_HYBRID && x86_pmu.intel_cap.perf_metrics)
> +	if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.perf_metrics)
>   		x86_pmu.intel_ctrl |= 1ULL << GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
>   
>   	return 0;
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> @@ -2217,7 +2217,7 @@ void __init intel_ds_init(void)
>   			}
>   			pr_cont("PEBS fmt4%c%s, ", pebs_type, pebs_qual);
>   
> -			if (!IS_X86_HYBRID && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
> +			if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
>   				pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT, ");
>   				x86_get_pmu()->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
>   			}
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
>   	/*
>   	 * Hybrid PMU support
>   	 */
> -	int			        hybrid_pmu_idx;
> +	struct pmu			*pmu;
>   };
>   
>   #define __EVENT_CONSTRAINT_RANGE(c, e, n, m, w, o, f) {	\
> @@ -671,21 +671,30 @@ struct x86_hybrid_pmu {
>   	struct extra_reg		*extra_regs;
>   };
>   
> -#define IS_X86_HYBRID			cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HYBRID_CPU)
> -
> -#define HAS_VALID_HYBRID_PMU_IN_CPUC(_cpuc)				\
> -	(IS_X86_HYBRID &&						\
> -	 ((_cpuc)->hybrid_pmu_idx >= X86_HYBRID_PMU_ATOM_IDX) &&	\
> -	 ((_cpuc)->hybrid_pmu_idx < X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX))
> +static __always_inline bool is_hybrid(void)
> +{
> +	return unlikely(cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HYBRID_CPU));
> +}
>   
> -#define X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_CPUC(_name, _cpuc)				\
> -	(_cpuc && HAS_VALID_HYBRID_PMU_IN_CPUC(_cpuc) ? x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[(_cpuc)->hybrid_pmu_idx]._name : x86_pmu._name)
> +static __always_inline bool is_hybrid_idx(int idx)
> +{
> +	return (unsigned)idx < X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX;
> +}
>   
> -#define X86_HYBRID_READ_FROM_EVENT(_name, _event)			\
> -	(IS_X86_HYBRID ? ((struct x86_hybrid_pmu *)(_event->pmu))->_name : x86_pmu._name)
> +static __always_inline struct x86_hybrid_pmu *hybrid_pmu(struct pmu *)
> +{
> +	return container_of(pmu, struct x86_hybrid_pmu, pmu);
> +}
>   
> -#define IS_VALID_HYBRID_PMU_IDX(idx)					\
> -	(idx < X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX && idx > X86_NON_HYBRID_PMU)
> +#define hybrid(_pmu, _field)						\
> +({									\
> +	typeof(x86_pmu._field) __F = x86_pmu._field;			\
> +									\
> +	if (is_hybrid() && (_pmu))					\
> +		__F = hybrid_pmu(_pmu)->_field;				\
> +									\
> +	__F;								\
> +})
>   
>   static inline enum x86_hybrid_pmu_type_idx
>   x86_hybrid_get_idx_from_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> @@ -898,9 +907,12 @@ struct x86_pmu {
>   	 * for all PMUs. The hybrid_pmu only includes the unique capabilities.
>   	 * The hybrid_pmu_bitmap is the bits map of the possible hybrid_pmu.
>   	 */
> +	int				(*filter_match)(struct perf_event *event);
>   	unsigned long			hybrid_pmu_bitmap;
> +	/*
> +	 * This thing is huge, use dynamic allocation!
> +	 */
>   	struct x86_hybrid_pmu		hybrid_pmu[X86_HYBRID_PMU_MAX_INDEX];
> -	int				(*filter_match)(struct perf_event *event);
>   };
>   
>   struct x86_perf_task_context_opt {
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2021-03-05 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-08 15:24 kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:24 ` [PATCH 01/49] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate Intel Hybrid Technology feature bit kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:24 ` [PATCH 02/49] x86/cpu: Describe hybrid CPUs in cpuinfo_x86 kan.liang
2021-02-08 17:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-08 19:04     ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-08 19:10       ` Luck, Tony
2021-02-08 19:19         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 03/49] perf/x86/intel: Hybrid PMU support for perf capabilities kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 04/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for intel_ctrl kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 05/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for counters kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 06/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for unconstrained kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 07/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for hardware cache event kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 08/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for event constraints kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 09/49] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for extra_regs kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 10/49] perf/x86/intel: Factor out intel_pmu_check_num_counters kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 11/49] perf/x86/intel: Factor out intel_pmu_check_event_constraints kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 12/49] perf/x86/intel: Factor out intel_pmu_check_extra_regs kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 13/49] perf/x86: Expose check_hw_exists kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 14/49] perf/x86: Remove temporary pmu assignment in event_init kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 15/49] perf/x86: Factor out x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 16/49] perf/x86: Register hybrid PMUs kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 17/49] perf/x86: Add structures for the attributes of Hybrid PMUs kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 18/49] perf/x86/intel: Add attr_update for " kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 19/49] perf/x86: Support filter_match callback kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 20/49] perf/x86/intel: Add Alder Lake Hybrid support kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 21/49] perf: Introduce PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE_PMU and PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE_PMU kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 22/49] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Alder Lake support kan.liang
2021-02-09  4:18   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 23/49] perf/x86/msr: Add Alder Lake CPU support kan.liang
2021-02-09  3:58   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-09 13:44     ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-09  5:15   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 24/49] perf/x86/cstate: " kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 25/49] perf/x86/rapl: Add support for Intel Alder Lake kan.liang
2021-02-09  5:16   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 26/49] perf jevents: Support unit value "cpu_core" and "cpu_atom" kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 27/49] perf util: Save pmu name to struct perf_pmu_alias kan.liang
2021-02-08 18:57   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09  0:17     ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 28/49] perf pmu: Save detected hybrid pmus to a global pmu list kan.liang
2021-02-08 18:55   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09  0:05     ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 29/49] perf pmu: Add hybrid helper functions kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 30/49] perf list: Support --cputype option to list hybrid pmu events kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 31/49] perf stat: Hybrid evsel uses its own cpus kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 32/49] perf header: Support HYBRID_TOPOLOGY feature kan.liang
2021-02-08 19:05   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09  0:26     ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 33/49] perf header: Support hybrid CPU_PMU_CAPS kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 34/49] tools headers uapi: Update tools's copy of linux/perf_event.h kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 35/49] perf parse-events: Create two hybrid hardware events kan.liang
2021-02-08 18:59   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09  0:23     ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 36/49] perf parse-events: Create two hybrid cache events kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 37/49] perf parse-events: Support hardware events inside PMU kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 38/49] perf list: Display pmu prefix for partially supported hybrid cache events kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 39/49] perf parse-events: Support hybrid raw events kan.liang
2021-02-08 19:07   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09  0:28     ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 40/49] perf stat: Support --cputype option for hybrid events kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 41/49] perf stat: Support metrics with " kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 42/49] perf evlist: Create two hybrid 'cycles' events by default kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 43/49] perf stat: Add default hybrid events kan.liang
2021-02-08 19:10   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09  0:36     ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 44/49] perf stat: Uniquify hybrid event name kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 45/49] perf stat: Merge event counts from all hybrid PMUs kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 46/49] perf stat: Filter out unmatched aggregation for hybrid event kan.liang
2021-02-08 19:16   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09  0:53     ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 47/49] perf evlist: Warn as events from different hybrid PMUs in a group kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 48/49] perf Documentation: Document intel-hybrid support kan.liang
2021-02-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 49/49] perf evsel: Adjust hybrid event and global event mixed group kan.liang
2021-02-08 19:12   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-09  0:47     ` Jin, Yao
2021-02-11 11:40 ` [PATCH 00/49] Add Alder Lake support for perf Jiri Olsa
2021-02-11 16:22   ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-18  0:07     ` Jin, Yao
2021-03-04 15:50 ` Liang, Kan
2021-03-04 17:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-05 11:14     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-05 13:36       ` Liang, Kan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b6b05e33-d4c8-8a05-ff06-ec86a50d0e4a@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome