From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] lib/vsprintf: Initialize vsprintf's pointer hash once the random core is ready.
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 14:36:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YufHN7fF0dROMETj@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YueeIgPGUJgsnsAh@linutronix.de>
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 11:34:26AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The printk code invokes vnsprintf in order to compute the complete
> string before adding it into its buffer. This happens in an IRQ-off
> region which leads to a warning on PREEMPT_RT in the random code if the
> format strings contains a %p for pointer printing. This happens because
> the random core acquires locks which become sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT
> which must not be acquired with disabled interrupts and or preemption
> disabled.
> By default the pointers are hashed which requires a random value on the
> first invocation (either by printk or another user which comes first.
>
> One could argue that there is no need for printk to disable interrupts
> during the vsprintf() invocation which would fix the just mentioned
> problem. However printk itself can be invoked in a context with
> disabled interrupts which would lead to the very same problem.
>
> Move the initialization of ptr_key into a worker and schedule it from
> subsys_initcall(). This happens early but after the workqueue subsystem
> is ready. Use get_random_bytes() to retrieve the random value if the RNG
> core is ready, otherwise schedule a worker in two seconds and try again.
>
> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> v2…v3:
> - schedule a worker every two seconds if the RNG core is not ready.
>
> lib/vsprintf.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -751,31 +751,39 @@ static int __init debug_boot_weak_hash_e
> early_param("debug_boot_weak_hash", debug_boot_weak_hash_enable);
>
> static bool filled_random_ptr_key;
> +static siphash_key_t ptr_key __read_mostly;
> +static void fill_ptr_key_workfn(struct work_struct *work);
> +static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(fill_ptr_key_work, fill_ptr_key_workfn);
> +
> +static void fill_ptr_key_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + if (!rng_is_initialized()) {
> + queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &fill_ptr_key_work, HZ * 2);
> + return;
> + }
This seems kind of crazy and over-complex. You only need this on RT,
right? Because of the raw lock issue? So just schedule it for the right
time on RT and not elsewhere.
I'll send a more basic patch.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-01 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-29 15:47 [PATCH 0/2 v2] Init the hashed pointer from a worker Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-07-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] lib/vsprintf: Remove static_branch_likely() from __ptr_to_hashval() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-01 12:11 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-08-01 12:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-01 12:13 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-08-01 12:42 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-07-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] lib/vsprintf: Initialize vsprintf's pointer hash once the random core is ready Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-07-29 23:29 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-08-01 7:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-01 9:34 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-01 12:36 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2022-08-01 12:39 ` [PATCH v4] lib/vsprintf: defer filling siphash key on RT Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-08-01 12:46 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-01 13:36 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-08-01 13:44 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-08-01 14:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-01 14:30 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-08-01 13:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-01 13:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-08-01 14:12 ` [PATCH v5] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-08-01 14:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-01 12:41 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] lib/vsprintf: Initialize vsprintf's pointer hash once the random core is ready Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-09-20 15:01 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-09-23 10:36 ` Petr Mladek
2022-09-23 15:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YufHN7fF0dROMETj@zx2c4.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome