From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v1 2/2] net. phy: dp83tg720: Add randomized polling intervals for unstable link detection
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:07:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0gksn9nEKJOY5Ul@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43cceaf2-6540-4a45-95fa-4382ab2953ef@lunn.ch>
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 04:37:49PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 02:10:11PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Address the limitations of the DP83TG720 PHY, which cannot reliably detect or
> > report a stable link state. To handle this, the PHY must be periodically reset
> > when the link is down. However, synchronized reset intervals between the PHY
> > and its link partner can result in a deadlock, preventing the link from
> > re-establishing.
> >
> > This change introduces a randomized polling interval when the link is down to
> > desynchronize resets between link partners.
>
> Hi Oleksij
>
> What other solutions did you try? I'm wondering if this is more
> complex than it needs to be. Could you add a random delay in
> dp83tg720_read_status() when it decides to do a reset?
Yes, this would be possible, but there are multiple reasons I decided to
go this way:
- in link down case, it is better to increase polling frequency, it
allows to reduce link up time.
- there are PHYs, for example an integrated to LAN9372 which supports
only link down interrupt. As long as link is down, it should be
polled.
- i'm working on generic PHY stats support and PHYs need to be polled,
even with IRQ support, just less frequently.
I can add it to the commit message.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-28 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-27 13:10 [RFC net-next v1 1/2] net: phy: Add support for driver-specific next update time Oleksij Rempel
2024-11-27 13:10 ` [RFC net-next v1 2/2] net. phy: dp83tg720: Add randomized polling intervals for unstable link detection Oleksij Rempel
2024-11-27 15:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-11-28 8:07 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2024-11-28 14:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-11-27 17:33 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-11-28 7:57 ` Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0gksn9nEKJOY5Ul@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®