From: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
To: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@marvell.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Haseeb Gani <hgani@marvell.com>,
Sathesh B Edara <sedara@marvell.com>,
Vimlesh Kumar <vimleshk@marvell.com>,
"thaller@redhat.com" <thaller@redhat.com>,
"wizhao@redhat.com" <wizhao@redhat.com>,
"kheib@redhat.com" <kheib@redhat.com>,
"konguyen@redhat.com" <konguyen@redhat.com>,
"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
"einstein.xue@synaxg.com" <einstein.xue@synaxg.com>,
Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@marvell.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Abhijit Ayarekar <aayarekar@marvell.com>,
"Satananda Burla" <sburla@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH net v2 1/4] octeon_ep: fix race conditions in ndo_get_stats64
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 14:25:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2LNOLxy0H1JoTnd@lzaremba-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR18MB472973A60723E9417FE1BB87C7042@CO1PR18MB4729.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 05:49:13PM +0000, Shinas Rasheed wrote:
>
>
> > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 03:30:12PM +0100, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 11:58:39PM -0800, Shinas Rasheed wrote:
> > > > > > ndo_get_stats64() can race with ndo_stop(), which frees input and
> > > > > > output queue resources. Call synchronize_net() to avoid such races.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fixes: 6a610a46bad1 ("octeon_ep: add support for ndo ops")
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@marvell.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > V2:
> > > > > > - Changed sync mechanism to fix race conditions from using an
> > atomic
> > > > > > set_bit ops to a much simpler synchronize_net()
> > > > > >
> > > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c | 1 +
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> > > > > > index 549436efc204..941bbaaa67b5 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> > > > > > @@ -757,6 +757,7 @@ static int octep_stop(struct net_device
> > *netdev)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > struct octep_device *oct = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + synchronize_net();
> > > > >
> > > > > You should have elaborated on the fact that this synchronize_net() is for
> > > > > __LINK_STATE_START flag in the commit message, this is not obvious.
> > Also,
> > > > is
> > > > > octep_get_stats64() called from RCU-safe context?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Now I see that in case !netif_running(), you do not bail out of
> > > > octep_get_stats64() fully (or at all after the second patch). So, could you
> > > > explain, how are you utilizing RCU here?
> > > >
> > >
> > > The understanding is that octep_get_stats64() (.ndo_get_stats64() in turn) is
> > called from RCU safe contexts, and
> > > that the netdev op is never called after the ndo_stop().
> >
> > As I now see, in net/core/net-sysfs.c, yes there is an rcu read lock around the
> > thing, but there are a lot more callers and for example veth_get_stats64()
> > explicitly calls rcu_read_lock().
> >
> > Also, even with RCU-protected section, I am not sure prevents the
> > octep_get_stats64() to be called after synchronize_net() finishes. Again, the
> > callers seem too diverse to definitely say that we can rely on built-in flags
> > for this to not happen :/
>
> Usually, the understanding is that ndo_get_stats won't be called by the network stack after the interface is put down. As long as that is the case, I don't think we should keep adding checks until there is a strong reason to do so. What do you think?
>
It is hard to know without testing (but testing should not be hard). I think the
phrase "Statistics must persist across routine operations like bringing the
interface down and up." [0] implies that bringing the interface down may not
necessarily prevent stats calls.
[0] https://docs.kernel.org/networking/statistics.html
> > > Thanks for the comments
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-16 7:58 [PATCH net v2 0/4] Fix " Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-16 7:58 ` [PATCH net v2 1/4] octeon_ep: fix " Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-16 14:30 ` Larysa Zaremba
2024-12-16 14:46 ` Larysa Zaremba
2024-12-16 18:28 ` [EXTERNAL] " Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-17 17:06 ` Larysa Zaremba
2024-12-17 17:49 ` Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-18 13:25 ` Larysa Zaremba [this message]
2024-12-18 13:58 ` Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-18 14:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-18 14:49 ` Larysa Zaremba
2024-12-18 15:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-18 15:25 ` Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-18 15:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-19 16:28 ` Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-19 16:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-16 18:24 ` Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-16 7:58 ` [PATCH net v2 2/4] octeon_ep: remove firmware stats fetch " Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-16 14:40 ` Larysa Zaremba
2024-12-16 18:31 ` [EXTERNAL] " Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-17 16:37 ` Larysa Zaremba
2024-12-16 7:58 ` [PATCH net v2 3/4] octeon_ep_vf: fix race conditions " Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-16 7:58 ` [PATCH net v2 4/4] octeon_ep_vf: remove firmware stats fetch " Shinas Rasheed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z2LNOLxy0H1JoTnd@lzaremba-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=aayarekar@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=einstein.xue@synaxg.com \
--cc=hgani@marvell.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kheib@redhat.com \
--cc=konguyen@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sburla@marvell.com \
--cc=sedara@marvell.com \
--cc=srasheed@marvell.com \
--cc=thaller@redhat.com \
--cc=vburru@marvell.com \
--cc=vimleshk@marvell.com \
--cc=wizhao@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®