From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
To: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: API to block and resume all running vcpus in a vm
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:56:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2e16531-5522-a334-40a1-2b0e17663800@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221022154819.1823133-1-eesposit@redhat.com>
Am 22.10.22 um 17:48 schrieb Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito:
> This new API allows the userspace to stop all running
> vcpus using KVM_KICK_ALL_RUNNING_VCPUS ioctl, and resume them with
> KVM_RESUME_ALL_KICKED_VCPUS.
> A "running" vcpu is a vcpu that is executing the KVM_RUN ioctl.
>
> This serie is especially helpful to userspace hypervisors like
> QEMU when they need to perform operations on memslots without the
> risk of having a vcpu reading them in the meanwhile.
> With "memslots operations" we mean grow, shrink, merge and split
> memslots, which are not "atomic" because there is a time window
> between the DELETE memslot operation and the CREATE one.
> Currently, each memslot operation is performed with one or more
> ioctls.
> For example, merging two memslots into one would imply:
> DELETE(m1)
> DELETE(m2)
> CREATE(m1+m2)
>
> And a vcpu could attempt to read m2 right after it is deleted, but
> before the new one is created.
>
> Therefore the simplest solution is to pause all vcpus in the kvm
> side, so that:
> - userspace just needs to call the new API before making memslots
> changes, keeping modifications to the minimum
> - dirty page updates are also performed when vcpus are blocked, so
> there is no time window between the dirty page ioctl and memslots
> modifications, since vcpus are all stopped.
> - no need to modify the existing memslots API
Isnt QEMU able to achieve the same goal today by forcing all vCPUs
into userspace with a signal? Can you provide some rationale why this
is better in the cover letter or patch description?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-24 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-22 15:48 Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-10-22 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] linux-headers/linux/kvm.h: introduce kvm_userspace_memory_region_list ioctl Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-10-22 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: introduce kvm_clear_all_cpus_request Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-10-22 15:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: introduce memory transaction semaphore Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-10-23 17:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-24 12:57 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-10-25 10:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-22 15:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: use signals to abort enter_guest/blocking and retry Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-10-23 17:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-24 7:43 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-10-24 7:49 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-10-25 10:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-24 7:56 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2022-10-24 8:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: API to block and resume all running vcpus in a vm Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-10-24 9:09 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-24 22:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-25 9:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-25 15:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-25 21:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-25 23:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-26 17:52 ` Hyper-V VTLs, permission bitmaps and userspace exits (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: API to block and resume all running vcpus in a vm) Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-26 19:33 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2e16531-5522-a334-40a1-2b0e17663800@linux.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®