mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <seanjc@google.com>, <chao.gao@intel.com>, <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 16/20] KVM: x86: Decode REX2 prefix in the emulator
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 12:01:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4058352-2628-45d6-86d6-92ac1eef4cad@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25c8c533-73a3-4cc1-9fbf-4301b2155f11@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1968 bytes --]

On 11/13/2025 3:30 PM, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> On 11/11/2025 9:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 11/10/25 19:01, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>>>
>>>           case 0x40 ... 0x4f: /* REX */
>>>               if (mode != X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64)
>>>                   goto done_prefixes;
>>> +            if (ctxt->rex_prefix == REX2_PREFIX)
>>> +                break;
>>>               ctxt->rex_prefix = REX_PREFIX;
>>>               ctxt->rex.raw    = 0x0f & ctxt->b;
>>>               continue;
>>> +        case 0xd5: /* REX2 */
>>> +            if (mode != X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64)
>>> +                goto done_prefixes;

[...]

>>> +            if (ctxt->rex_prefix == REX2_PREFIX &&
>>> +                ctxt->rex.bits.m0 == 0)
>>> +                break;
>>> +            ctxt->rex_prefix = REX2_PREFIX;
>>> +            ctxt->rex.raw    = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
>>> +            continue;
>> After REX2 always comes the main opcode byte, so you can "goto 
>> done_prefixes" here.  Or even jump here already; in pseudocode:
>>
>>      ctxt->b = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
>>      if (rex2 & REX_M)
>>          goto decode_twobyte;
>>      else
>>          goto decode_onebyte;
> 
> Yes, agreed. I think this makes the control flow more explicit.

While rebasing onto your VEX series, I noticed a couple of missings:

   (1) Jumping directly to the decode path skips the ctxt->op_bytes
       setup.
   (2) It also removes the logic that detects the invalid sequence:
       REX2->REX (unless intentional).

Perhaps it makes sense to simply continue prefix parsing. Then, at
'done_prefixes', we can check the M bit next to the W-bit check and jump
to the two-byte decode path.

I’ve attached a revised diff on top of the VEX series.

[-- Attachment #2: PATCH16_again.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2615 bytes --]

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 1b3da3ba26b8..3a66741b6c8c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ enum {
 	REX_X = 2,
 	REX_R = 4,
 	REX_W = 8,
+	REX_M = 0x80,
 };
 
 static void writeback_registers(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
@@ -4849,6 +4850,18 @@ static int x86_decode_avx(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 	return rc;
 }
 
+static inline bool rex2_invalid(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
+{
+	const struct x86_emulate_ops *ops = ctxt->ops;
+	u64 xcr = 0;
+
+	return ctxt->rex_prefix == REX_PREFIX ||
+	       (ctxt->rex_prefix == REX2_PREFIX && !(ctxt->rex_bits & REX_M)) ||
+	       !(ops->get_cr(ctxt, 4) & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE) ||
+	       ops->get_xcr(ctxt, 0, &xcr) ||
+	       !(xcr & XFEATURE_MASK_APX);
+}
+
 int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len, int emulation_type)
 {
 	int rc = X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
@@ -4902,7 +4915,7 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len, int
 	ctxt->op_bytes = def_op_bytes;
 	ctxt->ad_bytes = def_ad_bytes;
 
-	/* Legacy prefixes. */
+	/* Legacy and REX/REX2 prefixes. */
 	for (;;) {
 		switch (ctxt->b = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt)) {
 		case 0x66:	/* operand-size override */
@@ -4945,9 +4958,23 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len, int
 		case 0x40 ... 0x4f: /* REX */
 			if (mode != X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64)
 				goto done_prefixes;
+			if (ctxt->rex_prefix == REX2_PREFIX) {
+				opcode = ud;
+				goto done_modrm;
+			}
 			ctxt->rex_prefix = REX_PREFIX;
 			ctxt->rex_bits   = ctxt->b & 0xf;
 			continue;
+		case 0xd5: /* REX2 */
+			if (mode != X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64)
+				goto done_prefixes;
+			if (rex2_invalid(ctxt)) {
+				opcode = ud;
+				goto done_modrm;
+			}
+			ctxt->rex_prefix = REX2_PREFIX;
+			ctxt->rex_bits   = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
+			continue;
 		case 0xf0:	/* LOCK */
 			ctxt->lock_prefix = 1;
 			break;
@@ -4970,6 +4997,9 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len, int
 	if (ctxt->rex_bits & REX_W)
 		ctxt->op_bytes = 8;
 
+	if (ctxt->rex_bits & REX_M)
+		goto decode_twobytes;
+
 	/* Opcode byte(s). */
 	if (ctxt->b == 0xc4 || ctxt->b == 0xc5) {
 		/* VEX or LDS/LES */
@@ -4987,8 +5017,9 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len, int
 			goto done;
 	} else if (ctxt->b == 0x0f) {
 		/* Two- or three-byte opcode */
-		ctxt->opcode_len = 2;
 		ctxt->b = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
+decode_twobytes:
+		ctxt->opcode_len = 2;
 		opcode = twobyte_table[ctxt->b];
 
 		/* 0F_38 opcode map */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-17 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-10 18:01 [PATCH RFC v1 00/20] KVM: x86: Support APX feature for guests Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 01/20] KVM: x86: Rename register accessors to be GPR-specific Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 02/20] KVM: x86: Refactor GPR accessors to differentiate register access types Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:08   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:19     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:11   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:18     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 03/20] KVM: x86: Implement accessors for extended GPRs Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 04/20] KVM: VMX: Introduce unified instruction info structure Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 05/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor instruction information retrieval Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 06/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor GPR index retrieval from exit qualification Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 07/20] KVM: nVMX: Support the extended instruction info field Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 17:48   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-12  1:54     ` Chao Gao
2025-11-13 23:21       ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-17 23:29       ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-18  1:39         ` Chao Gao
2025-11-18 10:33           ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:20     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 08/20] KVM: VMX: Support extended register index in exit handling Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 17:45   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:22     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-13 23:40       ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 09/20] KVM: x86: Support EGPR accessing and tracking for instruction emulation Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 10/20] KVM: x86: Refactor REX prefix handling in " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:23     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 11/20] KVM: x86: Refactor opcode table lookup " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:24     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 12/20] KVM: x86: Support REX2-extended register index in the decoder Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:53   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:26     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:53   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 13/20] KVM: x86: Add REX2 opcode tables to the instruction decoder Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 14/20] KVM: x86: Emulate REX2-prefixed 64-bit absolute jump Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:27     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 15/20] KVM: x86: Reject EVEX-prefix instructions in the emulator Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:28     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 16/20] KVM: x86: Decode REX2 prefix " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 17:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:30     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-13 23:34       ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-17 20:01       ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2025-11-17 23:33         ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 17/20] KVM: x86: Prepare APX state setting in XCR0 Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:32     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 18/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX foundational feature bit to guests Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 19/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 20/20] KVM: selftests: Add APX state handling and XCR0 sanity checks Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:50 ` [PATCH RFC v1 00/20] KVM: x86: Support APX feature for guests Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:14 ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4058352-2628-45d6-86d6-92ac1eef4cad@intel.com \
    --to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®