From: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ioctl_tty.2: add TIOCGPTPEER documentation
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 02:54:03 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7175aad-645c-8f86-d7cf-51f24f0bc281@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878tijwjic.fsf@xmission.com>
> A couple of things to note on the bigger picture.
>
> The glibc library on all distributions has been changed to not have a
> setuid binary pt_chown, that uses ptsname. This was the primary fix
> for the security issue.
>
> The behavior of opening /dev/ptmx has been changed to perform a path
> lookup relative to the location of /dev/ptmx of ./pts/ptmx and open
> it it is a devpts filesystem and to fail otherwise. This further
> makes it hard to confuse userspace this way as /dev/ptmx always
> corresponds to /dev/pts/ptmx. Even in chroots and in other mount
> namespaces.
I have a feeling that there might be a way to trick glibc if you use
FUSE, but I haven't actually tried to create a PoC for it. Fair point
though.
> That makes TIOCGPTPEER a very nice addition, but not something people
> have to scramble to use to ensure their system is secure. As a hostile
> environment now has to work very hard to confuse the existing mechanisms.
There are usecases where you simply need TIOCGPTPEER, and no other
userspace alternative will do, but maybe if we modified the paragraph to
read (as suggested):
Security-conscious programs interacting with namespaces may
wish to use this operation rather than open(2) with the
pathname returned by ptsname(3).
This would clarify that there are usecases where you need this
particular feature, without saying causing people to panic over
inaccurate claims of glibc being broken. Does that sound better?
--
Aleksa Sarai
Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
https://www.cyphar.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-16 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-09 17:01 Aleksa Sarai
2017-06-09 18:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-15 19:27 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2017-08-16 4:43 ` Aleksa Sarai
2017-08-16 16:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-08-16 16:54 ` Aleksa Sarai [this message]
2017-08-16 17:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-11-20 10:20 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2017-11-20 12:15 ` Christian Brauner
2017-11-20 17:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a7175aad-645c-8f86-d7cf-51f24f0bc281@suse.de \
--to=asarai@suse.de \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®