From: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Valentin Rothberg <vrothberg@suse.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ioctl_tty.2: add TIOCGPTPEER documentation
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:43:29 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3ecdc80-15f8-344f-214e-97fa43f3e650@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11706e49-8271-ed8c-3747-19b3e8f2850d@gmail.com>
> I've applied this patch, and then tweaked the wording a little. Could
> you please check the following text:
>
> TIOCGPTPEER int flags
> (since Linux 4.13) Given a file descriptor in fd that
> refers to a pseudoterminal master, open (with the given
> open(2)-style flags) and return a new file descriptor that
> refers to the peer pseudoterminal slave device. This oper‐
> ation can be performed regardless of whether the pathname
> of the slave device is accessible through the calling
> process's mount namespaces.
>
> Security-conscious programs interacting with namespaces may
> wish to use this operation rather than open(2) with the
> pathname returned by ptsname(3), and similar library func‐
> tions that have insecure APIs.
Yup, that sounds good.
> I also have a question on the last sentence: what are the "similar library
> functions that have insecure APIs"? It's not clear to me what you are
> referring to here.
There are a few posix_-style functions provided by glibc that are just
wrappers around the open+ptsname combo that I mention earlier in the
sentence (and thus are vulnerable to the same issue). But if you feel
it's confusing you can feel free to drop it.
Thanks.
--
Aleksa Sarai
Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
https://www.cyphar.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-16 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-09 17:01 Aleksa Sarai
2017-06-09 18:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-08-15 19:27 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2017-08-16 4:43 ` Aleksa Sarai [this message]
2017-08-16 16:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-08-16 16:54 ` Aleksa Sarai
2017-08-16 17:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-11-20 10:20 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2017-11-20 12:15 ` Christian Brauner
2017-11-20 17:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3ecdc80-15f8-344f-214e-97fa43f3e650@suse.de \
--to=asarai@suse.de \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=vrothberg@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®