mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/15] x86/mtrr: have only one set_mtrr() variant
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:56:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8523ee6-6c1b-07f3-41ce-b6f28eeeeee4@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230412123044.GJZDakdLatRW26J+1k@fat_crate.local>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1892 bytes --]

On 12.04.23 14:30, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 08:36:45AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Today there are two variants of set_mtrr(): one calling stop_machine()
> 
> "... two variants which set MTRRs: set_mtrr() and set_mtrr_cpuslocked(),
> first calling ..."
> 
>> and one calling stop_machine_cpuslocked().
>>
>> The first one (set_mtrr()) has only one caller, and this caller is
>> always running with only one CPU online and interrupts being off.
> 
> Wait, whaaat?
> 
> It's only caller is mtrr_restore() and that is part of syscorse ops
> which is registered for
> 
> "The CPU has no MTRR and seems to not support SMP."
> 
> Do you mean that, per chance?

I'm not sure the comment is accurate ("has no MTRR" is a bad way
to say that X86_FEATURE_MTRR is 0, BTW).

The main point is that mtrr_restore() is called with interrupts off
and before any other potential CPUs are started again.

> If you do, please explain that properly in the commit message - this is
> not a guessing game.

Okay.

> By the looks of that syscore thing, it is needed for the very old MTRR
> implementations which weren't SMP (K6, Centaur, Cyrix etc).
> 
> Please explain that in the commit message too. It needs to say *why* the
> transformation you're doing is ok.

I've outlined the "why" above. I'll replace the paragraph you were referring
to.

> 
> "this caller is always running with only one CPU online" is not nearly
> beginning to explain what the situation is.
> 
>> Remove the first variant completely and replace the call of it with
>> a call of mtrr_if->set().
>>
>> Rename the second variant set_mtrr_cpuslocked() to set_mtrr() now that
>> there is only one variant left.
> 
> Those are visible from the diff itself - you don't need to explain what
> the patch does but why.

Okay, I'll drop that paragraph.


Juergen

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3149 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-01  6:36 [PATCH v5 00/15] x86/mtrr: fix handling with PAT but without MTRR Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] x86/mtrr: split off physical address size calculation Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] x86/mtrr: optimize mtrr_calc_physbits() Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] x86/mtrr: replace some constants with defines Juergen Gross
2023-04-03 16:03   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-05  7:55     ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-05 20:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-11 13:32         ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] x86/mtrr: support setting MTRR state for software defined MTRRs Juergen Gross
2023-04-03  2:25   ` Huang, Kai
2023-04-03  7:10     ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-03  9:27       ` Huang, Kai
2023-04-03  9:35         ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-03  9:44           ` Huang, Kai
2023-04-03  9:43         ` Huang, Kai
2023-04-11 13:20   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-11 13:31     ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-11 17:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-11 13:59     ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-04-11 14:04       ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-11 14:26         ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-11 15:57           ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-11 17:15             ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-12  8:30               ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-11 14:25       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] x86/hyperv: set MTRR state when running as SEV-SNP Hyper-V guest Juergen Gross
2023-04-02  2:36   ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] x86/xen: set MTRR state when running as Xen PV initial domain Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] x86/mtrr: replace vendor tests in MTRR code Juergen Gross
2023-04-12  8:45   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-12 10:25     ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] x86/mtrr: have only one set_mtrr() variant Juergen Gross
2023-04-12 12:30   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-12 12:56     ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2023-04-12 20:09       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] x86/mtrr: allocate mtrr_value array dynamically Juergen Gross
2023-04-12 21:11   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-13 10:07     ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] x86/mtrr: add get_effective_type() service function Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] x86/mtrr: construct a memory map with cache modes Juergen Gross
2023-04-20 12:15   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-20 12:30     ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-20 12:30       ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-20 13:01       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-20 13:57         ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-20 14:54           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-20 15:10             ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-21 11:23               ` Borislav Petkov
2023-04-21 14:35                 ` Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] x86/mtrr: use new cache_map in mtrr_type_lookup() Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] x86/mtrr: don't let mtrr_type_lookup() return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] x86/mm: only check uniform after calling mtrr_type_lookup() Juergen Gross
2023-04-01  6:36 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] x86/mtrr: remove unused code Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a8523ee6-6c1b-07f3-41ce-b6f28eeeeee4@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®