From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64/mm: Drop pte_mkhuge()
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:29:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a91df2f6-e0d6-4902-ae22-5df132f00737@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4372d54-34bb-4a32-8742-ea6aacc0848c@arm.com>
On 10/9/24 18:50, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 05/10/2024 13:38, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Core HugeTLB defines arch_make_huge_pte() fallback definition, which calls
>> platform provided pte_mkhuge(). But if any platform already provides custom
>> arch_make_huge_pte(), then it does not need to provide pte_mkhuge(). arm64
>> defines arch_make_huge_pte(), but then also calls pte_mkhuge() internally.
>> This creates confusion as if both of these callbacks are being used in core
>> HugeTLB and required to be defined in the platform.
>>
>> This changes arch_make_huge_pte() to create block mapping directly and also
>> drops off now redundant helper pte_mkhuge(), making things clear. Also this
>> changes HugeTLB page creation from just clearing the PTE_TABLE_BIT (bit[1])
>> to actually setting bits[1:0] via PTE_TYPE_[MASK|SECT] instead.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 -----
>> arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
>> index fd330c1db289..956a702cb532 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
>> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@
>> #define PTE_VALID (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 0)
>> #define PTE_TYPE_MASK (_AT(pteval_t, 3) << 0)
>> #define PTE_TYPE_PAGE (_AT(pteval_t, 3) << 0)
>> +#define PTE_TYPE_SECT (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 0)
>> #define PTE_TABLE_BIT (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 1)
>> #define PTE_USER (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 6) /* AP[1] */
>> #define PTE_RDONLY (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 7) /* AP[2] */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index c329ea061dc9..fa4c32a9f572 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -438,11 +438,6 @@ static inline void __set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Huge pte definitions.
>> - */
>> -#define pte_mkhuge(pte) (__pte(pte_val(pte) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT))
>> -
>> /*
>> * Hugetlb definitions.
>> */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> index 5f1e2103888b..5922c95630ad 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ pte_t arch_make_huge_pte(pte_t entry, unsigned int shift, vm_flags_t flags)
>> {
>> size_t pagesize = 1UL << shift;
>>
>> - entry = pte_mkhuge(entry);
>> + entry = __pte((pte_val(entry) & ~PTE_TYPE_MASK) | PTE_TYPE_SECT);
>
> I think there may be an existing bug here; if pagesize == CONT_PTE_SIZE, then
> entry will be placed in the level 3 table. In this case, shouldn't bit 1 remain
> set, because at level 3, a page mapping is denoted by bits[1:0] = 3 ? Currently
> its being unconditionally cleared.
That's not a problem, pte_mkcont() brings back both the bits
via PTE_TYPE_PAGE along with PTE_CONT.
if (pagesize == CONT_PTE_SIZE) {
entry = pte_mkcont(entry);
} else if (pagesize == CONT_PMD_SIZE) {
entry = pmd_pte(pmd_mkcont(pte_pmd(entry)));
} else if (pagesize != PUD_SIZE && pagesize != PMD_SIZE) {
pr_warn("%s: unrecognized huge page size 0x%lx\n",
__func__, pagesize);
}
static inline pte_t pte_mkcont(pte_t pte)
{
pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_CONT));
return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_TYPE_PAGE));
}
Although the same is not required for CONT_PMD_SIZE size huge
pages where only PTE_CONT is enough.
static inline pmd_t pmd_mkcont(pmd_t pmd)
{
return __pmd(pmd_val(pmd) | PMD_SECT_CONT);
}
>> if (pagesize == CONT_PTE_SIZE) {
>> entry = pte_mkcont(entry);
>> } else if (pagesize == CONT_PMD_SIZE) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-14 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-05 12:38 [PATCH 0/5] arm64/mm: Drop PXD_TABLE_BIT Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-05 12:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64/mm: Drop pte_mkhuge() Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-09 13:20 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-10-14 8:59 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2024-10-14 11:08 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-10-15 4:23 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-05 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64/mm: Replace PXD_TABLE_BIT with PXD_TYPE_[MASK|SECT] Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-09 13:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-10-14 10:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-14 11:33 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-10-15 3:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-05 12:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64/ptdump: Test PMD_TYPE_MASK for block mapping Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-09 13:29 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-10-05 12:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: ptdump: " Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-09 13:30 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-10-05 12:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64/mm: Drop PXD_TABLE_BIT Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-09 13:32 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Ryan Roberts
2024-10-15 6:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a91df2f6-e0d6-4902-ae22-5df132f00737@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome