mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64/mm: Drop pte_mkhuge()
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:08:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8f8f9e8-b042-4df8-92ea-1439a5e1ffb4@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a91df2f6-e0d6-4902-ae22-5df132f00737@arm.com>

On 14/10/2024 09:59, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/9/24 18:50, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> On 05/10/2024 13:38, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> Core HugeTLB defines arch_make_huge_pte() fallback definition, which calls
>>> platform provided pte_mkhuge(). But if any platform already provides custom
>>> arch_make_huge_pte(), then it does not need to provide pte_mkhuge(). arm64
>>> defines arch_make_huge_pte(), but then also calls pte_mkhuge() internally.
>>> This creates confusion as if both of these callbacks are being used in core
>>> HugeTLB and required to be defined in the platform.
>>>
>>> This changes arch_make_huge_pte() to create block mapping directly and also
>>> drops off now redundant helper pte_mkhuge(), making things clear. Also this
>>> changes HugeTLB page creation from just clearing the PTE_TABLE_BIT (bit[1])
>>> to actually setting bits[1:0] via PTE_TYPE_[MASK|SECT] instead.
>>>
>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h | 1 +
>>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h       | 5 -----
>>>  arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c            | 2 +-
>>>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
>>> index fd330c1db289..956a702cb532 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
>>> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@
>>>  #define PTE_VALID		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 0)
>>>  #define PTE_TYPE_MASK		(_AT(pteval_t, 3) << 0)
>>>  #define PTE_TYPE_PAGE		(_AT(pteval_t, 3) << 0)
>>> +#define PTE_TYPE_SECT		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 0)
>>>  #define PTE_TABLE_BIT		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 1)
>>>  #define PTE_USER		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 6)		/* AP[1] */
>>>  #define PTE_RDONLY		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 7)		/* AP[2] */
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> index c329ea061dc9..fa4c32a9f572 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> @@ -438,11 +438,6 @@ static inline void __set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>>  	}
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -/*
>>> - * Huge pte definitions.
>>> - */
>>> -#define pte_mkhuge(pte)		(__pte(pte_val(pte) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT))
>>> -
>>>  /*
>>>   * Hugetlb definitions.
>>>   */
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>>> index 5f1e2103888b..5922c95630ad 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>>> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ pte_t arch_make_huge_pte(pte_t entry, unsigned int shift, vm_flags_t flags)
>>>  {
>>>  	size_t pagesize = 1UL << shift;
>>>  
>>> -	entry = pte_mkhuge(entry);
>>> +	entry = __pte((pte_val(entry) & ~PTE_TYPE_MASK) | PTE_TYPE_SECT);
>>
>> I think there may be an existing bug here; if pagesize == CONT_PTE_SIZE, then
>> entry will be placed in the level 3 table. In this case, shouldn't bit 1 remain
>> set, because at level 3, a page mapping is denoted by bits[1:0] = 3 ? Currently
>> its being unconditionally cleared.
> 
> That's not a problem, pte_mkcont() brings back both the bits
> via PTE_TYPE_PAGE along with PTE_CONT.
> 
>         if (pagesize == CONT_PTE_SIZE) {
>                 entry = pte_mkcont(entry);
>         } else if (pagesize == CONT_PMD_SIZE) {
>                 entry = pmd_pte(pmd_mkcont(pte_pmd(entry)));
>         } else if (pagesize != PUD_SIZE && pagesize != PMD_SIZE) {
>                 pr_warn("%s: unrecognized huge page size 0x%lx\n",
>                         __func__, pagesize);
>         }
> 
> static inline pte_t pte_mkcont(pte_t pte)
> {
> 	pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_CONT));
>       	return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_TYPE_PAGE));

Oh wow, that's pretty hacky. Good job we never call pte_mkcont() on a
PTE_PRESENT_INVALID PTE. This would turn it valid again.

> }
> 
> Although the same is not required for CONT_PMD_SIZE size huge
> pages where only PTE_CONT is enough.
> 
> static inline pmd_t pmd_mkcont(pmd_t pmd)
> {
>         return __pmd(pmd_val(pmd) | PMD_SECT_CONT);
> }
>  
>>>  	if (pagesize == CONT_PTE_SIZE) {
>>>  		entry = pte_mkcont(entry);
>>>  	} else if (pagesize == CONT_PMD_SIZE) {
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-14 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-05 12:38 [PATCH 0/5] arm64/mm: Drop PXD_TABLE_BIT Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-05 12:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64/mm: Drop pte_mkhuge() Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-09 13:20   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-10-14  8:59     ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-14 11:08       ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-10-15  4:23         ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-05 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64/mm: Replace PXD_TABLE_BIT with PXD_TYPE_[MASK|SECT] Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-09 13:28   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-10-14 10:48     ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-14 11:33       ` Ryan Roberts
2024-10-15  3:50         ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-05 12:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64/ptdump: Test PMD_TYPE_MASK for block mapping Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-09 13:29   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-10-05 12:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: ptdump: " Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-09 13:30   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-10-05 12:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64/mm: Drop PXD_TABLE_BIT Anshuman Khandual
2024-10-09 13:32 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Ryan Roberts
2024-10-15  6:47   ` Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e8f8f9e8-b042-4df8-92ea-1439a5e1ffb4@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome