From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
"mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com" <mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yan Y Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: TDX: Check KVM exit on KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE when TD finalize
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:58:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEh0oGeh96n9OvCT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <936ccea77b474fbad1bde799ee92139356f91c5f.camel@intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025, Rick P Edgecombe wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-06-10 at 10:14 +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
> > Check userspace has enabled KVM exit on KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE during
> > KVM_TDX_FINALIZE_VM.
> >
> > TDVMCALL_MAP_GPA is one of the GHCI base TDVMCALLs, so it must be
> > implemented by VMM to support TDX guests. KVM converts TDVMCALL_MAP_GPA
> > to KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE, which requires userspace to enable
> > KVM_CAP_EXIT_HYPERCALL with KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE bit set. Check it when
> > userspace requests KVM_TDX_FINALIZE_VM, so that there is no need to check
> > it during TDX guests running.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
>
> Do we need this change? It seems reasonable, but I don't think we need KVM to
> ensure that userspace creates a TD that meets the GHCI spec.
+1. We do need to be careful about unintentionally creating ABI, but generally
speaking KVM shouldn't police userspace.
> So I'm not sure about the justification.
>
> It seems like the reasoning could be just to shrink the possible configurations
> KVM has to think about, and that we only have the option to do this now before
> the ABI becomes harder to change.
>
> Did you need any QEMU changes as a result of this patch?
>
> Wait, actually I think the patch is wrong, because KVM_CAP_EXIT_HYPERCALL could
> be called again after KVM_TDX_FINALIZE_VM. In which case userspace could get an
> exit unexpectedly. So should we drop this patch?
Yes, drop it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 2:14 [RFC PATCH 0/4] TDX attestation support and GHCI fixup Binbin Wu
2025-06-10 2:14 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: TDX: Add new TDVMCALL status code for unsupported subfuncs Binbin Wu
2025-06-10 2:14 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] KVM: TDX: Handle TDG.VP.VMCALL<GetQuote> Binbin Wu
2025-06-10 2:14 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] KVM: TDX: Exit to userspace for GetTdVmCallInfo Binbin Wu
2025-06-10 9:16 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-10 16:50 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-10 16:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 2:04 ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-11 2:37 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 14:17 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 14:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 14:41 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 1:37 ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-11 2:17 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 14:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 14:58 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 16:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 16:53 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 18:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 18:52 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-12 8:27 ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-12 15:26 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-20 18:27 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-10 2:14 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: TDX: Check KVM exit on KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE when TD finalize Binbin Wu
2025-06-10 17:01 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-10 19:58 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-06-11 1:22 ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-11 13:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 14:01 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 14:04 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 14:26 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 16:00 ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-11 15:33 ` Binbin Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEh0oGeh96n9OvCT@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jiewen.yao@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=tony.lindgren@intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®