mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 "binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
	 "mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com" <mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	 Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	 Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@intel.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	 Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yan Y Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	 Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
	Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: TDX: Check KVM exit on KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE when TD finalize
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:58:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEh0oGeh96n9OvCT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <936ccea77b474fbad1bde799ee92139356f91c5f.camel@intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 10, 2025, Rick P Edgecombe wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-06-10 at 10:14 +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
> > Check userspace has enabled KVM exit on KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE during
> > KVM_TDX_FINALIZE_VM.
> > 
> > TDVMCALL_MAP_GPA is one of the GHCI base TDVMCALLs, so it must be
> > implemented by VMM to support TDX guests. KVM converts TDVMCALL_MAP_GPA
> > to KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE, which requires userspace to enable
> > KVM_CAP_EXIT_HYPERCALL with KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE bit set. Check it when
> > userspace requests KVM_TDX_FINALIZE_VM, so that there is no need to check
> > it during TDX guests running.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Do we need this change? It seems reasonable, but I don't think we need KVM to
> ensure that userspace creates a TD that meets the GHCI spec.

+1.  We do need to be careful about unintentionally creating ABI, but generally
speaking KVM shouldn't police userspace.

> So I'm not sure about the justification.
> 
> It seems like the reasoning could be just to shrink the possible configurations
> KVM has to think about, and that we only have the option to do this now before
> the ABI becomes harder to change.
> 
> Did you need any QEMU changes as a result of this patch?
> 
> Wait, actually I think the patch is wrong, because KVM_CAP_EXIT_HYPERCALL could
> be called again after KVM_TDX_FINALIZE_VM. In which case userspace could get an
> exit unexpectedly. So should we drop this patch?

Yes, drop it.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-10  2:14 [RFC PATCH 0/4] TDX attestation support and GHCI fixup Binbin Wu
2025-06-10  2:14 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: TDX: Add new TDVMCALL status code for unsupported subfuncs Binbin Wu
2025-06-10  2:14 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] KVM: TDX: Handle TDG.VP.VMCALL<GetQuote> Binbin Wu
2025-06-10  2:14 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] KVM: TDX: Exit to userspace for GetTdVmCallInfo Binbin Wu
2025-06-10  9:16   ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-10 16:50     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-10 16:54       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11  2:04         ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-11  2:37           ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 14:17             ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 14:34               ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 14:41                 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11  1:37     ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-11  2:17       ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 14:54         ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 14:58           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 16:26             ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 16:53               ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 18:13                 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 18:52                   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-12  8:27                   ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-12 15:26                     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-20 18:27                   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-10  2:14 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: TDX: Check KVM exit on KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE when TD finalize Binbin Wu
2025-06-10 17:01   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-10 19:58     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-06-11  1:22       ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-11 13:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 14:01           ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 14:04             ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 14:26               ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 16:00                 ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-11 15:33           ` Binbin Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aEh0oGeh96n9OvCT@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=jiewen.yao@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.lindgren@intel.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®