* [PATCH] nouveau/firmware: fix memory leak on BL load failure
@ 2026-06-05 2:07 Dawei Feng
2026-06-05 18:22 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dawei Feng @ 2026-06-05 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lyude
Cc: dakr, maarten.lankhorst, mripard, tzimmermann, airlied, simona,
namcao, dri-devel, nouveau, linux-kernel, jianhao.xu, Dawei Feng,
stable, Zilin Guan
If loading the HS bootloader blob fails, nvkm_falcon_fw_ctor_hs() returns
immediately. This skips the common cleanup path and leaks the firmware
state allocated by nvkm_falcon_fw_ctor() and nvkm_falcon_fw_sign().
Fix this by routing the load failure to the 'done' label so
nvkm_falcon_fw_dtor() can properly clean up the partially initialized
state. Also clear the original 'blob' pointer after releasing it so the
final nvkm_firmware_put() remains balanced after a failed bootloader
reload.
The bug was first flagged by an experimental analysis tool we are
developing for kernel memory-management bugs while analyzing
v6.13-rc1. The tool is still under development and is not yet publicly
available. Manual inspection confirms that the bug is still present in
v7.1-rc6.
An x86_64 allyesconfig build showed no new warnings. As we do not have a
supported NVIDIA GPU with the required firmware to test this path, no
runtime testing was able to be performed.
Fixes: 2541626cfb79 ("drm/nouveau/acr: use common falcon HS FW code for ACR FWs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zilin Guan <zilin@seu.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Feng <dawei.feng@seu.edu.cn>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/falcon/fw.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/falcon/fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/falcon/fw.c
index 4e8b3f1c7e25..71f55c5b0837 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/falcon/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/falcon/fw.c
@@ -278,10 +278,11 @@ nvkm_falcon_fw_ctor_hs(const struct nvkm_falcon_fw_func *func, const char *name,
if (bl) {
nvkm_firmware_put(blob);
+ blob = NULL;
ret = nvkm_firmware_load_name(subdev, bl, "", ver, &blob);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto done;
hdr = nvfw_bin_hdr(subdev, blob->data);
desc = nvfw_bl_desc(subdev, blob->data + hdr->header_offset);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nouveau/firmware: fix memory leak on BL load failure
2026-06-05 2:07 [PATCH] nouveau/firmware: fix memory leak on BL load failure Dawei Feng
@ 2026-06-05 18:22 ` Timur Tabi
2026-06-08 13:52 ` Dawei Feng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2026-06-05 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lyude, dawei.feng
Cc: jianhao.xu, zilin, namcao, simona, dri-devel, linux-kernel,
nouveau, dakr, maarten.lankhorst, stable, mripard
On Fri, 2026-06-05 at 10:07 +0800, Dawei Feng wrote:
> if (bl) {
> nvkm_firmware_put(blob);
> + blob = NULL;
>
I think it would be cleaner to instead delete this nvkm_firmware_put(blob) call here, and just rely
on the call to nvkm_firmware_put() at the end of nvkm_falcon_fw_ctor_hs(). Then you won't need
"blob = NULL".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nouveau/firmware: fix memory leak on BL load failure
2026-06-05 18:22 ` Timur Tabi
@ 2026-06-08 13:52 ` Dawei Feng
2026-06-08 17:53 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dawei Feng @ 2026-06-08 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ttabi
Cc: dakr, dawei.feng, dri-devel, jianhao.xu, linux-kernel, lyude,
maarten.lankhorst, mripard, namcao, nouveau, simona, stable,
zilin
Hi Timur,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 06:22:41PM +0000, Timur Tabi wrote:
> I think it would be cleaner to instead delete this
> nvkm_firmware_put(blob) call here, and just rely on the call to
> nvkm_firmware_put() at the end of nvkm_falcon_fw_ctor_hs(). Then you
> won't need "blob = NULL".
Thanks for your review.
I don't think we can drop the nvkm_firmware_put(blob) here. At this
point, blob still points to the image firmware loaded at the beginning of
nvkm_falcon_fw_ctor_hs(). The later nvkm_firmware_load_name(..., &blob)
call overwrites blob with the bootloader firmware pointer on success.
If we only rely on the final nvkm_firmware_put(blob), the success path
would release the bootloader firmware, but the original image firmware
pointer would be lost and leaked.
Best regards,
Dawei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nouveau/firmware: fix memory leak on BL load failure
2026-06-08 13:52 ` Dawei Feng
@ 2026-06-08 17:53 ` Timur Tabi
2026-06-09 8:57 ` Dawei Feng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2026-06-08 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dawei.feng
Cc: jianhao.xu, zilin, namcao, lyude, dri-devel, simona,
linux-kernel, nouveau, dakr, maarten.lankhorst, stable, mripard
On Mon, 2026-06-08 at 21:52 +0800, Dawei Feng wrote:
> Hi Timur,
>
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 06:22:41PM +0000, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > I think it would be cleaner to instead delete this
> > nvkm_firmware_put(blob) call here, and just rely on the call to
> > nvkm_firmware_put() at the end of nvkm_falcon_fw_ctor_hs(). Then you
> > won't need "blob = NULL".
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> I don't think we can drop the nvkm_firmware_put(blob) here. At this
> point, blob still points to the image firmware loaded at the beginning of
> nvkm_falcon_fw_ctor_hs(). The later nvkm_firmware_load_name(..., &blob)
> call overwrites blob with the bootloader firmware pointer on success.
>
> If we only rely on the final nvkm_firmware_put(blob), the success path
> would release the bootloader firmware, but the original image firmware
> pointer would be lost and leaked.
Ah yes, you're right.
So now I think a better fix might be to have two different `blob` variables, so that there is no
longer any confusion. Because right now, the nvkm_firmware_put() call at the end of the function
releases a different `blob` depending on whether `bl` is NULL or not.
What do you think about this:
nvkm_firmware_put(blob);
if (bl) {
const struct firmware *blob_bl;
ret = nvkm_firmware_load_name(subdev, bl, "", ver, &blob_bl);
if (ret)
goto done;
...
nvkm_firmware_put(blob_bl);
if (!fw->boot)
ret = -ENOMEM;
} else {
fw->boot_addr = fw->nmem_base;
}
done:
if (ret)
nvkm_falcon_fw_dtor(fw);
return ret;
This way, there is no confusion between the two blobs, and the bootloader blob exists only inside
the if-block that needs it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nouveau/firmware: fix memory leak on BL load failure
2026-06-08 17:53 ` Timur Tabi
@ 2026-06-09 8:57 ` Dawei Feng
2026-06-09 15:00 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dawei Feng @ 2026-06-09 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ttabi
Cc: dakr, dawei.feng, dri-devel, jianhao.xu, linux-kernel, lyude,
maarten.lankhorst, mripard, namcao, nouveau, simona, stable,
zilin
Hi, Timur,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 06:22:41PM +0000, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Ah yes, you're right.
>
> So now I think a better fix might be to have two different `blob`
> variables, so that there is no longer any confusion. Because right now,
> the nvkm_firmware_put() call at the end of the function releases a
> different `blob` depending on whether `bl` is NULL or not.
>
> What do you think about this:
>
> nvkm_firmware_put(blob);
> if (bl) {
> const struct firmware *blob_bl;
>
> ret = nvkm_firmware_load_name(subdev, bl, "", ver, &blob_bl);
> if (ret)
> goto done;
> ...
> nvkm_firmware_put(blob_bl);
> if (!fw->boot)
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> } else {
> fw->boot_addr = fw->nmem_base;
> }
>
> done:
> if (ret)
> nvkm_falcon_fw_dtor(fw);
>
> return ret;
Yes, using a separate pointer `blob_bl` for the bootloader firmware is a
cleaner approach.
However, we must keep the final nvkm_firmware_put(blob) under the done
label. Moving it earlier would cause memory leaks in prior error paths
like nvkm_falcon_fw_ctor(), which jump directly to done.
A safer approach is to manage blob_bl locally inside the if (bl) block,
while leaving the original blob cleanup at the end.
What do you think about this:
if (bl) {
const struct firmware *blob_bl;
ret = nvkm_firmware_load_name(subdev, bl, "", ver, &blob_bl);
if (ret)
goto done;
...
nvkm_firmware_put(blob_bl);
if (!fw->boot)
ret = -ENOMEM;
} else {
fw->boot_addr = fw->nmem_base;
}
done:
if (ret)
nvkm_falcon_fw_dtor(fw);
nvkm_firmware_put(blob);
return ret;
Regards,
Dawei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nouveau/firmware: fix memory leak on BL load failure
2026-06-09 8:57 ` Dawei Feng
@ 2026-06-09 15:00 ` Timur Tabi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2026-06-09 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dawei.feng
Cc: jianhao.xu, zilin, namcao, lyude, dri-devel, simona,
linux-kernel, nouveau, dakr, maarten.lankhorst, stable, mripard
On Tue, 2026-06-09 at 16:57 +0800, Dawei Feng wrote:
> if (bl) {
> const struct firmware *blob_bl;
>
> ret = nvkm_firmware_load_name(subdev, bl, "", ver, &blob_bl);
> if (ret)
> goto done;
>
> ...
> nvkm_firmware_put(blob_bl);
> if (!fw->boot)
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> } else {
> fw->boot_addr = fw->nmem_base;
> }
>
> done:
> if (ret)
> nvkm_falcon_fw_dtor(fw);
>
> nvkm_firmware_put(blob);
> return ret;
Yes, this is good. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-09 15:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-05 2:07 [PATCH] nouveau/firmware: fix memory leak on BL load failure Dawei Feng
2026-06-05 18:22 ` Timur Tabi
2026-06-08 13:52 ` Dawei Feng
2026-06-08 17:53 ` Timur Tabi
2026-06-09 8:57 ` Dawei Feng
2026-06-09 15:00 ` Timur Tabi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®