Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: sophgo: Add ethernet configuration for cv18xx

[Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>]

On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 06:43:03AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 02:09:06PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv18xx.dtsi
> > > @@ -210,6 +210,55 @@ i2c4: i2c@4040000 {
> > >  			status = "disabled";
> > >  		};
> > >  
> > > +		gmac0: ethernet@4070000 {
> > > +			compatible = "snps,dwmac-3.70a";
> > > +			reg = <0x04070000 0x10000>;
> > > +			clocks = <&clk CLK_AXI4_ETH0>, <&clk CLK_ETH0_500M>;
> > > +			clock-names = "stmmaceth", "ptp_ref";
> > > +			interrupts = <31 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > +			interrupt-names = "macirq";
> > > +			phy-handle = <&phy0>;
> > > +			phy-mode = "rmii";
> > > +			rx-fifo-depth = <8192>;
> > > +			tx-fifo-depth = <8192>;
> > > +			snps,multicast-filter-bins = <0>;
> > > +			snps,perfect-filter-entries = <1>;
> > > +			snps,aal;
> > > +			snps,txpbl = <8>;
> > > +			snps,rxpbl = <8>;
> > > +			snps,mtl-rx-config = <&gmac0_mtl_rx_setup>;
> > > +			snps,mtl-tx-config = <&gmac0_mtl_tx_setup>;
> > > +			snps,axi-config = <&gmac0_stmmac_axi_setup>;
> > > +			status = "disabled";
> > > +
> > > +			mdio {
> > > +				compatible = "snps,dwmac-mdio";
> > > +				#address-cells = <1>;
> > > +				#size-cells = <0>;
> > > +
> > > +				phy0: phy@0 {
> > > +					compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
> > > +					reg = <0>;
> > > +				};
> > > +			};
> > 
> > It is not clear to me what cv18xx.dtsi represents, 
> 
> This is a include file to define common ip for the whole
> cv18xx series SoCs (cv1800b, cv1812h, sg2000, sg2000).
> 
> > and where the PHY node should be, here, or in a .dts file. 
> > Is this a SOM, and the PHY is on the SOM? 
> 
> The phy is on the SoC, it is embedded, and no external phy
> is supported. So I think the phy node should stay here, not 
> in the dts file.

So this is correct when the PHY is internal. However, this is normally
expressed by setting phy-mode to "internal". The stmmac driver might
however not allow that? If not, please put a comment indicating the
PHY is part of the SoC.

	Andrew