mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JeeHeng Sia <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: "paul.walmsley@sifive.com" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"palmer@dabbelt.com" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"aou@eecs.berkeley.edu" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>,
	Mason Huo <mason.huo@starfivetech.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 4/4] RISC-V: Add arch functions to support hibernation/suspend-to-disk
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 07:29:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abd16b950ca744b081fc9f545977b8fa@EXMBX066.cuchost.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230228071845.k6s6bcnesdsnw3jl@orel>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 February, 2023 3:19 PM
> To: JeeHeng Sia <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>
> Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com; palmer@dabbelt.com; aou@eecs.berkeley.edu; linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>; Mason Huo <mason.huo@starfivetech.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] RISC-V: Add arch functions to support hibernation/suspend-to-disk
> 
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:33:32AM +0000, JeeHeng Sia wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 28 February, 2023 1:05 PM
> > > To: JeeHeng Sia <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>
> > > Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com; palmer@dabbelt.com; aou@eecs.berkeley.edu; linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> > > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>; Mason Huo <mason.huo@starfivetech.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] RISC-V: Add arch functions to support hibernation/suspend-to-disk
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 01:32:53AM +0000, JeeHeng Sia wrote:
> > > > > > > > 	load image;
> > > > > > > > loop:	Create pbe chain, return error if failed;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This loop pseudocode is incomplete. It's
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > loop:
> > > > > > >         if (swsusp_page_is_forbidden(page) && swsusp_page_is_free(page))
> > > > > > > 	   return page_address(page);
> > > > > > > 	Create pbe chain, return error if failed;
> > > > > > > 	...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > which I pointed out explicitly in my last reply. Also, as I asked in my
> > > > > > > last reply (and have been asking four times now, albeit less explicitly
> > > > > > > the first two times), how do we know at least one PBE will be linked?
> > > > > > 1 PBE correspond to 1 page, you shouldn't expect only 1 page is saved.
> > > > >
> > > > > I know PBEs correspond to pages. *Why* should I not expect only one page
> > > > > is saved? Or, more importantly, why should I expect more than zero pages
> > > > > are saved?
> > > > >
> > > > > Convincing answers might be because we *always* put the restore code in
> > > > > pages which get added to the PBE list or that the original page tables
> > > > > *always* get put in pages which get added to the PBE list. It's not very
> > > > > convincing to simply *assume* that at least one random page will always
> > > > > meet the PBE list criteria.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hibernation core will do the calculation. If the PBEs (restore_pblist) linked successfully, the hibernated image will be restore
> else
> > > > > normal boot will take place.
> > > > > > > Or, even more specifically this time, where is the proof that for each
> > > > > > > hibernation resume, there exists some page such that
> > > > > > > !swsusp_page_is_forbidden(page) or !swsusp_page_is_free(page) is true?
> > > > > > forbidden_pages and free_pages are not contributed to the restore_pblist (as you already aware from the code). Infact, the
> > > > > forbidden_pages and free_pages are not save into the disk.
> > > > >
> > > > > Exactly, so those pages are *not* going to contribute to the greater than
> > > > > zero pages. What I've been asking for, from the beginning, is to know
> > > > > which page(s) are known to *always* contribute to the list. Or, IOW, how
> > > > > do you know the PBE list isn't empty, a.k.a restore_pblist isn't NULL?
> > > > Well, this is keep going around in a circle, thought the answer is in the hibernation code. restore_pblist get the pointer from the
> PBE,
> > > and the PBE already checked for validity.
> > >
> > > It keeps going around in circles because you keep avoiding my question by
> > > pointing out trivial linked list code. I'm not worried about the linked
> > > list code being correct. My concern is that you're using a linked list
> > > with an assumption that it is not empty. My question has been all along,
> > > how do you know it's not empty?
> > >
> > > I'll change the way I ask this time. Please take a look at your PBE list
> > > and let me know if there are PBEs on it that must be there on each
> > > hibernation resume, e.g. the resume code page is there or whatever.
> > >
> > > > Can I suggest you to submit a patch to the hibernation core?
> > >
> > > Why? What's wrong with it?
> > Kindly let me draw 2 scenarios for you. Option 1 is to add the restore_pblist checking to the hibernation core and option 2 is to add
> restore_pblist checking to the arch solution
> > Although I really don't think it is needed. But if you really wanted to add the checking, I would suggest to go with option 1. again, I
> really think that it is not needed!
> 
> This entire email thread is because you've first coded, and now stated,
> that you don't think the PBE list will ever be empty. And now, below, I
> see you're proposing to return an error when the PBE list is empty, why?
> If there's nothing in the PBE list, then there's nothing to do for it.
> Why is that an error condition?
> 
> Please explain to me why you think the PBE list *must* not be empty
> (which is what I've been asking for over and over). OIOW, are there
> any pages you have in mind which the resume kernel always uses and
> are also always going to end up in the suspend image? I don't know,
> but I assume clean, file-backed pages do not get added to the suspend
> image, which would rule out most kernel code pages. Also, many pages
> written during boot (which is where the resume kernel is at resume time)
> were no longer resident at hibernate time, so they won't be in the
> suspend image either. While it's quite likely I'm missing something
> obvious, I'd rather be told what that is than to assume the PBE list
> will never be empty. Which is why I keep asking about it...
The answer already in the Linux kernel hibernation core, do you need me to write a white paper to explain in detail or you need a conference call? 
> 
> Thanks,
> drew
> 
> >
> > 	//Option 1
> > 	//Pseudocode to illustrate the image loading
> > 	initialize restore_pblist to null;
> > 	initialize safe_pages_list to null;
> > 	Allocate safe page list, return error if failed;
> > 	load image;
> > loop:	Create pbe chain, return error if failed;
> > 	assign orig_addr and safe_page to pbe;
> > 	link pbe to restore_pblist;
> > 	/* Add checking here */
> > 	return error if restore_pblist equal to null;
> > 	return pbe to handle->buffer;
> > 	check handle->buffer;
> > 	goto loop if no error else return with error;
> >
> > 	//option 2
> > 	//Pseudocode to illustrate the image loading
> > 	initialize restore_pblist to null;
> > 	initialize safe_pages_list to null;
> > 	Allocate safe page list, return error if failed;
> > 	load image;
> > loop:	Create pbe chain, return error if failed;
> > 	assign orig_addr and safe_page to pbe;
> > 	link pbe to restore_pblist;
> > 	return pbe to handle->buffer;
> > 	check handle->buffer;
> > 	goto loop if no error else return with error;
> > 	everything works correctly, continue the rest of the operation
> > 	invoke swsusp_arch_resume
> >
> > 	//@swsusp_arch_resume()
> > loop2: return error if restore_pblist is null
> > 	increment restore_pblist and goto loop2
> > 	create temp_pg_table
> > 	continue the rest of the resume operation
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > drew

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-28  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-21  2:35 [PATCH v4 0/4] RISC-V Hibernation Support Sia Jee Heng
2023-02-21  2:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] RISC-V: Change suspend_save_csrs and suspend_restore_csrs to public function Sia Jee Heng
2023-02-23  6:39   ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-24  1:33     ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-21  2:35 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] RISC-V: Factor out common code of __cpu_resume_enter() Sia Jee Heng
2023-02-23  6:51   ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-24  1:33     ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-24 10:19   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2023-02-27  2:21     ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-21  2:35 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] RISC-V: mm: Enable huge page support to kernel_page_present() function Sia Jee Heng
2023-02-23  6:57   ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-24  1:33     ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-24 10:21   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2023-02-21  2:35 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] RISC-V: Add arch functions to support hibernation/suspend-to-disk Sia Jee Heng
2023-02-23 18:07   ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-24  2:05     ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-24  9:00       ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-24  9:33         ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-24  9:55           ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-24 10:30             ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-24 12:07               ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-27  2:14                 ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-27  7:59                   ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-27 10:52                     ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-27 11:44                       ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-28  1:32                         ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-28  5:04                           ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-28  5:33                             ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-28  7:18                               ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-28  7:29                                 ` JeeHeng Sia [this message]
2023-02-28  7:37                                   ` Andrew Jones
2023-03-03  1:53                                     ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-03-03  8:09                                       ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-28  6:33                             ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-28  7:29                               ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-28  7:34                                 ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-24  2:12   ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-24 12:29   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2023-02-27  3:11     ` JeeHeng Sia
2023-02-27 20:31       ` Alexandre Ghiti
2023-02-28  1:20         ` JeeHeng Sia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abd16b950ca744b081fc9f545977b8fa@EXMBX066.cuchost.com \
    --to=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mason.huo@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®