mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>,
	Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/7] vhost-vdpa: VHOST_NEW_OWNER
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:27:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acfccf72-2883-407d-977a-9c2566cf8cb3@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEu0sNx=saZOaVRbuV7Gz7+_GD-v42i+Bdk-NCp6syABbw@mail.gmail.com>

On 7/14/2024 10:26 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 9:19 PM Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add an ioctl to transfer file descriptor ownership and pinned memory
>> accounting from one process to another.
>>
>> This is more efficient than VHOST_RESET_OWNER followed by VHOST_SET_OWNER,
>> as that would unpin all physical pages, requiring them to be repinned in
>> the new process.  That would cost multiple seconds for large memories, and
>> be incurred during a virtual machine's pause time during live update.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/vhost/vdpa.c       | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/vhost/vhost.c      | 15 ++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/vhost/vhost.h      |  1 +
>>   include/uapi/linux/vhost.h | 10 ++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> index b49e5831b3f0..5cf55ca4ec02 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> @@ -632,6 +632,44 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_resume(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
>>          return ret;
>>   }
>>
>> +static long vhost_vdpa_new_owner(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
>> +{
>> +       int r;
>> +       struct vhost_dev *vdev = &v->vdev;
>> +       struct mm_struct *mm_old = vdev->mm;
>> +       struct mm_struct *mm_new = current->mm;
>> +       long pinned_vm = v->pinned_vm;
>> +       unsigned long lock_limit = PFN_DOWN(rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK));
>> +
>> +       if (!mm_old)
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +       mmgrab(mm_old);
>> +
>> +       if (!v->vdpa->use_va &&
>> +           pinned_vm + atomic64_read(&mm_new->pinned_vm) > lock_limit) {
>> +               r = -ENOMEM;
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
> 
> So this seems to allow an arbitrary process to execute this. Seems to be unsafe.
> 
> I wonder if we need to add some checks here, maybe PID or other stuff
> to only allow the owner process to do this.

The original owner must send the file descriptor to the new owner.
That constitutes permission to take ownership.

>> +       r = vhost_vdpa_bind_mm(v, mm_new);
>> +       if (r)
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       r = vhost_dev_new_owner(vdev);
>> +       if (r) {
>> +               vhost_vdpa_bind_mm(v, mm_old);
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       if (!v->vdpa->use_va) {
>> +               atomic64_sub(pinned_vm, &mm_old->pinned_vm);
>> +               atomic64_add(pinned_vm, &mm_new->pinned_vm);
>> +       }
>> +
>> +out:
>> +       mmdrop(mm_old);
>> +       return r;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static long vhost_vdpa_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned int cmd,
>>                                     void __user *argp)
>>   {
>> @@ -876,6 +914,9 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *filep,
>>          case VHOST_VDPA_RESUME:
>>                  r = vhost_vdpa_resume(v);
>>                  break;
>> +       case VHOST_NEW_OWNER:
>> +               r = vhost_vdpa_new_owner(v);
>> +               break;
>>          default:
>>                  r = vhost_dev_ioctl(&v->vdev, cmd, argp);
>>                  if (r == -ENOIOCTLCMD)
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> index b60955682474..ab40ae50552f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> @@ -963,6 +963,21 @@ long vhost_dev_set_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_dev_set_owner);
>>
>> +/* Caller should have device mutex */
>> +long vhost_dev_new_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +       if (dev->mm == current->mm)
>> +               return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> +       if (!vhost_dev_has_owner(dev))
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       vhost_detach_mm(dev);
>> +       vhost_attach_mm(dev);
> 
> This seems to do nothing unless I miss something.

vhost_detach mm drops dev->mm.
vhost_attach_mm grabs current->mm.

- Steve

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-15 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-12 13:18 [PATCH V2 0/7] vdpa live update Steve Sistare
2024-07-12 13:18 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] vhost-vdpa: count pinned memory Steve Sistare
2024-07-12 13:18 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] vhost-vdpa: pass mm to bind Steve Sistare
2024-07-12 13:18 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] vhost-vdpa: VHOST_NEW_OWNER Steve Sistare
2024-07-15  2:26   ` Jason Wang
2024-07-15  9:06     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-07-15 14:27     ` Steven Sistare [this message]
2024-07-16  5:16       ` Jason Wang
2024-07-17 18:28         ` Steven Sistare
2024-07-22  7:26           ` Jason Wang
2024-07-15  9:07   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-07-15 14:29     ` Steven Sistare
2024-07-15 14:38       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-07-15 15:38         ` Steven Sistare
2024-07-12 13:18 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] vhost-vdpa: VHOST_BACKEND_F_NEW_OWNER Steve Sistare
2024-07-15  2:31   ` Jason Wang
2024-07-15 14:27     ` Steven Sistare
2024-07-12 13:18 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] vhost-vdpa: VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP Steve Sistare
2024-07-15  2:34   ` Jason Wang
2024-07-15 14:28     ` Steven Sistare
2024-07-16  5:28       ` Jason Wang
2024-07-17 18:29         ` Steven Sistare
2024-07-18  0:45           ` Jason Wang
2024-07-18 19:39             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-07-18 20:19               ` Steven Sistare
2024-07-19  1:01                 ` Jason Wang
2024-07-12 13:18 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] vhost-vdpa: VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_REMAP Steve Sistare
2024-07-12 13:18 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] vdpa/mlx5: new owner capability Steve Sistare
2024-07-12 14:06 ` [PATCH V2 0/7] vdpa live update Steven Sistare
2024-07-15  2:14 ` Jason Wang
2024-07-15 14:28   ` Steven Sistare
2024-07-16  5:30     ` Jason Wang
2024-07-17 18:29       ` Steven Sistare
2024-07-18  0:33         ` Jason Wang
2024-07-20 21:34           ` Steven Sistare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acfccf72-2883-407d-977a-9c2566cf8cb3@oracle.com \
    --to=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®