From: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Cc: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re: __elv_add_request OOPS]
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 14:44:45 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1105251416340.3472@ubuntu-natty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDCB1C8.7040708@fusionio.com>
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Jens Axboe wrote:
> While this will fix your particular oops, I don't think it's quite
> right. It's fixing one particular piece of fall out from attempting to
> talk to a removed device, it's not necessarily fixing the full class of
> them. The other checks in scsi_set_medium_removal() aren't related to a
> changing state of the device, they are capability checks.
Below patch pushes the check down to ioctl functions and hopefully should
cover more ioctl-on-gone-device cases by returning -ENXIO if an attempt
was made to submit request to a non-running device.
With this patch in place - instead of oopsing I now get a proper I/O error
on resume.
AFAICT from my limited SCSI layer knowledge - these seem to be the right
places to check. Would be interested in knowing if there are better/more
complete ways to handle this but if they are going to take time IMHO it
certainly doesn't hurt to keep the below patch in.
Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
index d9564fb..c32cade 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
@@ -91,6 +91,10 @@ static int ioctl_internal_command(struct scsi_device *sdev, char *cmd,
int result;
struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
+ if (!sdev || sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL
+ || sdev->sdev_state > SDEV_QUIESCE)
+ return -ENXIO;
+
SCSI_LOG_IOCTL(1, printk("Trying ioctl with scsi command %d\n", *cmd));
result = scsi_execute_req(sdev, cmd, DMA_NONE, NULL, 0,
@@ -195,8 +199,9 @@ int scsi_ioctl(struct scsi_device *sdev, int cmd, void __user *arg)
{
char scsi_cmd[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
- /* No idea how this happens.... */
- if (!sdev)
+ /* No idea how !sdev happens.... */
+ if (!sdev || sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL
+ || sdev->sdev_state > SDEV_QUIESCE)
return -ENXIO;
/*
@@ -288,6 +293,10 @@ int scsi_nonblockable_ioctl(struct scsi_device *sdev, int cmd,
{
int val, result;
+ if (!sdev || sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL
+ || sdev->sdev_state > SDEV_QUIESCE)
+ return -ENXIO;
+
/* The first set of iocts may be executed even if we're doing
* error processing, as long as the device was opened
* non-blocking */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 4:29 __elv_add_request OOPS Parag Warudkar
2011-05-24 10:44 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 1:41 ` [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re: __elv_add_request OOPS] Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 7:37 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 18:44 ` Parag Warudkar [this message]
2011-05-25 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:02 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:17 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:52 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:18 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:42 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:52 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 23:00 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 23:45 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <1306370123.1641.76.camel@mulgrave.site>
2011-05-26 1:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-26 1:06 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-26 1:43 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-27 3:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-27 5:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-27 20:21 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-28 12:42 ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-08 6:50 ` Torsten Hilbrich
2011-05-25 20:20 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 20:22 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:29 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 20:26 ` __elv_add_request OOPS James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1105251416340.3472@ubuntu-natty \
--to=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®