From: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re: __elv_add_request OOPS]
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:18:23 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1105251613500.8972@ubuntu-natty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimWPWc4k2_q0KZpmWo9G93UmVWoxA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2175 bytes --]
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +static inline int sdev_early_check(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> > +{
> > + if (!sdev || sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL
> > + || sdev->sdev_state > SDEV_QUIESCE)
> > + return -ENXIO;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> Can somebody explain why it's those states, and nothing else?
>
> Quite frankly, if it's about "don't oops on sdev->queue not existing",
> then test for that. Not for some random and uncommented list of
> states.
List of states and what commands if any are accepeted for each state are
explained in scsi_device.h enum definition of scsi_device_state :
enum scsi_device_state {
SDEV_CREATED = 1, /* device created but not added to sysfs
* Only internal commands allowed (for
inq) */
SDEV_RUNNING, /* device properly configured
* All commands allowed */
SDEV_CANCEL, /* beginning to delete device
* Only error handler commands allowed */
SDEV_DEL, /* device deleted
* no commands allowed */
SDEV_QUIESCE, /* Device quiescent. No block commands
* will be accepted, only specials (which
* originate in the mid-layer) */
SDEV_OFFLINE, /* Device offlined (by error handling or
* user request */
SDEV_BLOCK, /* Device blocked by scsi lld. No
* scsi commands from user or midlayer
* should be issued to the scsi
* lld. */
SDEV_CREATED_BLOCK, /* same as above but for created devices
*/
};
In this case - we check for cases where no commands are allowed and reject
those right away, leaving prep_state_check to do filtering at lower level
for which commands are allowed and which are not as the state permits.
Parag
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 4:29 __elv_add_request OOPS Parag Warudkar
2011-05-24 10:44 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 1:41 ` [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re: __elv_add_request OOPS] Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 7:37 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 18:44 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:02 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:17 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:52 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:18 ` Parag Warudkar [this message]
2011-05-25 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:42 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:52 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 23:00 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 23:45 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <1306370123.1641.76.camel@mulgrave.site>
2011-05-26 1:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-26 1:06 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-26 1:43 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-27 3:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-27 5:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-27 20:21 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-28 12:42 ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-08 6:50 ` Torsten Hilbrich
2011-05-25 20:20 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 20:22 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:29 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 20:26 ` __elv_add_request OOPS James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1105251613500.8972@ubuntu-natty \
--to=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®