* [socfpga-nex:for_next-fpgamgr-without-overlays-v4.3 8/9] drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c:655:25: sparse: symbol 'socfpga_fpga_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2014-12-11 1:43 kbuild test robot
2014-12-11 1:43 ` [PATCH socfpga-nex] staging: fpga manager: socfpga_fpga_ops can be static kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2014-12-11 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Tull; +Cc: kbuild-all, Greg Kroah-Hartman, devel, linux-kernel
tree: git://git.rocketboards.org/linux-socfpga-next for_next-fpgamgr-without-overlays-v4.3
head: 7920447fc75922e9a72db640cddf890d75a30e0d
commit: 99aa2d008ce7a2a925368bfddd53ae83d307fb38 [8/9] staging: fpga manager: add driver for socfpga fpga manager
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
git checkout 99aa2d008ce7a2a925368bfddd53ae83d307fb38
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c:655:25: sparse: symbol 'socfpga_fpga_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH socfpga-nex] staging: fpga manager: socfpga_fpga_ops can be static
2014-12-11 1:43 [socfpga-nex:for_next-fpgamgr-without-overlays-v4.3 8/9] drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c:655:25: sparse: symbol 'socfpga_fpga_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
@ 2014-12-11 1:43 ` kbuild test robot
2014-12-11 20:40 ` One Thousand Gnomes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2014-12-11 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Tull; +Cc: kbuild-all, Greg Kroah-Hartman, devel, linux-kernel
drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c:655:25: sparse: symbol 'socfpga_fpga_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
socfpga.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c b/drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c
index 4440b84..ae9a2f1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ static int socfpga_fpga_resume(struct fpga_manager *mgr)
return ret;
}
-struct fpga_manager_ops socfpga_fpga_ops = {
+static struct fpga_manager_ops socfpga_fpga_ops = {
.reset = socfpga_fpga_reset,
.state = socfpga_fpga_ops_state,
.write_init = socfpga_fpga_ops_configure_init,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH socfpga-nex] staging: fpga manager: socfpga_fpga_ops can be static
2014-12-11 1:43 ` [PATCH socfpga-nex] staging: fpga manager: socfpga_fpga_ops can be static kbuild test robot
@ 2014-12-11 20:40 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-12-12 15:31 ` atull
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: One Thousand Gnomes @ 2014-12-11 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild test robot
Cc: Alan Tull, kbuild-all, Greg Kroah-Hartman, devel, linux-kernel
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:43:24 +0800
kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c:655:25: sparse: symbol 'socfpga_fpga_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Ought to be const as well by the look of it - we don't want function
pointers in patchable memory spaces.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH socfpga-nex] staging: fpga manager: socfpga_fpga_ops can be static
2014-12-11 20:40 ` One Thousand Gnomes
@ 2014-12-12 15:31 ` atull
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: atull @ 2014-12-12 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: One Thousand Gnomes
Cc: kbuild test robot, kbuild-all, Greg Kroah-Hartman, devel, linux-kernel
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:43:24 +0800
> kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c:655:25: sparse: symbol 'socfpga_fpga_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> Ought to be const as well by the look of it - we don't want function
> pointers in patchable memory spaces.
>
I agree. Will be in v5.
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-12 15:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-11 1:43 [socfpga-nex:for_next-fpgamgr-without-overlays-v4.3 8/9] drivers/staging/fpga/socfpga.c:655:25: sparse: symbol 'socfpga_fpga_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2014-12-11 1:43 ` [PATCH socfpga-nex] staging: fpga manager: socfpga_fpga_ops can be static kbuild test robot
2014-12-11 20:40 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-12-12 15:31 ` atull
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome