Re: [BUG] long freezes on thinkpad t60

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>]

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> yeah. I think Linux is i think the only OS on the planet that is using 
> the movb trick for unlock, it even triggered a hardware erratum ;)

I'm pretty sure others do it too.

Maybe not on an OS level (but I actually doubt that - I'd be surprised if 
Windows doesn't do the exact same thing), but I know for a fact that a lot 
of people in threaded libraries end up depending very much on the "simple 
store closes a locked section".

Just googling for "xchg" "mov" "spinlock" "-linux" shows discussion boards 
for Windows developers with open-coded spinlocks like


	int ResourceFlag = 0; // 0=Free, 1=Inuse
	...
	// Wait until we get the resource
	while(InterlockedExchange(&ResourceFlag, 1) != 0) {
	   Sleep(0); } // Wait a tad
	// Have the resource
	... // do your thing
	ResourceFlag = 0; // Release the resource


and that's definitely Windows code, not some Linux person doing it.

And this is from an OS2 forum

	unsigned owned=0;

	void request() {
	  while(LockedExchanged(&owned,1)!=0)
	    ;
	}

	void release() {
	  owned = 0;
	}

so it's not even something unusual.

So while arguably these people don't know (and don't care) about subtle 
issues like memory ordering, I can *guarantee* that a lot of programs 
depend on them, even if that dependency may often come from a lack of 
knowledge, rather than actively understanding what we do like in the Linux 
kernel community.

(And yes, they rely on compilers not reordering either. Tough.)

		Linus