mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [git patch] free_irq() fixes
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:52:44 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804221651400.2779@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <480E796E.4070001@garzik.org>



On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> [...]
> > Since the #irq-remove project involves removal of the 'irq' argument
> > from interrupt handlers (unused 99.8% of the time),
> [...]
> 
> After going over every irq handler (read: almost every driver in the kernel,
> plus arch code), my #irq-remove branch has confirmed what my gut already knew
> -- the 'irq' argument is completely unused for almost every driver.  So I was
> taking that line of thought as far as it went.

Ok, that's just not going to happen.

What's the upside? Really?

I can tell you the downsides:
 - tons of huge patches with ugly churn
 - total disaster when it comes to any drivers that are maintained over 
   multiple versions and/or out-of-tree like the DRI stuff

so those upsides had better be really big.

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-22 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-22 22:17 Jeff Garzik
2008-04-22 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 22:59   ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-22 23:20     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 23:49       ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-22 23:52         ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-04-23  0:05           ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-23  0:16             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-23 13:51               ` Rene Herman
2008-04-24  2:10                 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-24  2:19                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-24  5:59                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-24 10:53                       ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-24 15:16                         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-24 15:40                           ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-24 15:55                             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-24 15:37                               ` Alan Cox
2008-04-24 16:20                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-24 16:16                               ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-24 16:48                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-24 16:58                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-24 18:15                                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-24 17:30                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-25  2:53                                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-25  3:33                                     ` MSI, fun for the whole family (was Re: [git patch] free_irq() fixes) Jeff Garzik
2008-04-25  3:57                                       ` MSI, fun for the whole family Roland Dreier
2008-04-25  4:19                                         ` David Miller
2008-04-25  4:35                                         ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-25  5:48                                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-25 22:44                                           ` Roland Dreier
2008-04-25  5:08                                       ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0804221651400.2779@woody.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®