From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [git patch] free_irq() fixes
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:16:31 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804221714380.2779@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080423000529.GG28933@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> If it goes like the regs removal in one big patch around -rc1 into your
> tree this shouldn't be a problem.
Well, the regs removal had a real upside (it wasn't even sensible for all
irq types), and really nobody used it apart from "system users" (ie Sysrq
etc).
I'm still waiting for anybody mentioning any upside at _all_ on removing
"irq".
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-23 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-22 22:17 Jeff Garzik
2008-04-22 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 22:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-22 23:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 23:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-22 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-23 0:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-23 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-04-23 13:51 ` Rene Herman
2008-04-24 2:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-24 2:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-24 5:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-24 10:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-24 15:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-24 15:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-24 15:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-24 15:37 ` Alan Cox
2008-04-24 16:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-24 16:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-24 16:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-24 16:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-24 18:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-24 17:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-25 2:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-25 3:33 ` MSI, fun for the whole family (was Re: [git patch] free_irq() fixes) Jeff Garzik
2008-04-25 3:57 ` MSI, fun for the whole family Roland Dreier
2008-04-25 4:19 ` David Miller
2008-04-25 4:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-25 5:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-25 22:44 ` Roland Dreier
2008-04-25 5:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0804221714380.2779@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®