From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: regression in TSC unstable?
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 01:21:46 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905080117410.4710@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0905072359530.28378@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> The ring-buffer-benchmark module creates a producer and consumer and loops
> on do_gettimeofday until it hits about 10 seconds. Then it calculates the
> number of events recorded / time running.
>
> After Ingo merged Linus's latest
merged what into what?
are you referring to the upstream kernel or something else?
> my tests when from 330ns per entry to
> 880ns. After bisecting it I came down to this change:
>
> commit a71e4917dc0ebbcb5a0ecb7ca3486643c1c9a6e2
> Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Date: Tue Apr 21 00:50:11 2009 -0400
>
> ACPI: idle: mark_tsc_unstable() at init-time, not run-time
>
>
> I've never had a problem with the TSC with this box before. It passes the
> synchronization phase, and until this commit, the TSC never was marked as
> unstable.
>
> Should it now be unstable? Or is this a false positive?
If you revert that patch the issue goes away?
Does your Xeon even export any C-states?
(cat /proc/acpi/processor/*/power)
does your dmesg before or afer the patch actually print
"TSC halts in idle"?
thanks,
-Len
> # cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 15
> model : 4
> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz
> stepping : 1
> cpu MHz : 2793.272
> cache size : 1024 KB
> physical id : 0
> siblings : 2
> core id : 0
> cpu cores : 1
> apicid : 0
> initial apicid : 0
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 5
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx
> lm constant_tsc pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr
> bogomips : 5586.54
> clflush size : 64
> cache_alignment : 128
> address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> power management:
>
> Anything else I might need to know?
>
> -- Steve
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-08 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-08 4:14 Steven Rostedt
2009-05-08 5:21 ` Len Brown [this message]
2009-05-08 12:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-11 0:26 ` Regression in TSC unstable -- confirmed Frans Pop
2009-05-11 14:22 ` [PATCH] ACPI: do not mark TSC unstable for invalid C-states Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-11 15:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-11 15:03 ` Frans Pop
2009-05-11 16:43 ` Janne Kulmala
2009-05-14 19:46 ` Len Brown
2009-05-14 20:09 ` Len Brown
2009-05-14 20:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-14 21:55 ` [PATCH] ACPI: idle: fix init-time TSC check regression Len Brown
2009-05-14 22:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-15 3:36 ` Len Brown
2009-05-14 22:31 ` Frans Pop
2009-05-15 5:40 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Idle C-states disabled by max_cstate should not disable the TSC Len Brown
2009-05-15 6:18 ` [PATCH] ACPI: idle: rename lapic timer workaround routines Len Brown
2009-05-15 8:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-15 8:27 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Idle C-states disabled by max_cstate should not disable the TSC Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-15 10:57 ` [PATCH] ACPI: idle: fix init-time TSC check regression Frans Pop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0905080117410.4710@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome