From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Janne Kulmala <janne.t.kulmala@tut.fi>,
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
johnstul@us.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: idle: fix init-time TSC check regression
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:55:16 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905141750100.24833@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905142217340.3561@localhost.localdomain>
From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
A previous 2.6.30 patch, a71e4917dc0ebbcb5a0ecb7ca3486643c1c9a6e2,
(ACPI: idle: mark_tsc_unstable() at init-time, not run-time)
erroneously disabled the TSC on systems that did not actually
have valid deep C-states.
Move the check after the deep-C-states are validated,
via new helper, tsc_check_state(), hich replaces tsc_halts_in_c().
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
---
Thomas,
I decided to use a tsc-specific helper
rather than piggyback on acpi_timer_check_state(),
since that is not general, but rather LAPIC timer specific.
(and I'll re-name that to reflect its specific function
in a cosmetic follow-up patch)
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index f7ca8c5..421cc5c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ int acpi_processor_resume(struct acpi_device * device)
}
#if defined (CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME) && defined (CONFIG_X86)
-static int tsc_halts_in_c(int state)
+static void tsc_check_state(int state)
{
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
@@ -226,13 +226,17 @@ static int tsc_halts_in_c(int state)
* C/P/S0/S1 states when this bit is set.
*/
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC))
- return 0;
+ return;
/*FALL THROUGH*/
default:
- return state > ACPI_STATE_C1;
+ /* TSC could halt in idle, so notify users */
+ if (state > ACPI_STATE_C1)
+ mark_tsc_unstable("TSC halts in idle");
}
}
+#else
+static void tsc_check_state(int state) { return; }
#endif
static int acpi_processor_get_power_info_fadt(struct acpi_processor *pr)
@@ -581,11 +585,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_power_verify(struct acpi_processor *pr)
for (i = 1; i < ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER; i++) {
struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = &pr->power.states[i];
-#if defined (CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME) && defined (CONFIG_X86)
- /* TSC could halt in idle, so notify users */
- if (tsc_halts_in_c(cx->type))
- mark_tsc_unstable("TSC halts in idle");;
-#endif
switch (cx->type) {
case ACPI_STATE_C1:
cx->valid = 1;
@@ -603,6 +602,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_power_verify(struct acpi_processor *pr)
acpi_timer_check_state(i, pr, cx);
break;
}
+ if (cx->valid)
+ tsc_check_state(cx->type);
if (cx->valid)
working++;
--
1.6.3.1.9.g95405b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-08 4:14 regression in TSC unstable? Steven Rostedt
2009-05-08 5:21 ` Len Brown
2009-05-08 12:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-11 0:26 ` Regression in TSC unstable -- confirmed Frans Pop
2009-05-11 14:22 ` [PATCH] ACPI: do not mark TSC unstable for invalid C-states Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-11 15:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-11 15:03 ` Frans Pop
2009-05-11 16:43 ` Janne Kulmala
2009-05-14 19:46 ` Len Brown
2009-05-14 20:09 ` Len Brown
2009-05-14 20:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-14 21:55 ` Len Brown [this message]
2009-05-14 22:27 ` [PATCH] ACPI: idle: fix init-time TSC check regression Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-15 3:36 ` Len Brown
2009-05-14 22:31 ` Frans Pop
2009-05-15 5:40 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Idle C-states disabled by max_cstate should not disable the TSC Len Brown
2009-05-15 6:18 ` [PATCH] ACPI: idle: rename lapic timer workaround routines Len Brown
2009-05-15 8:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-15 8:27 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Idle C-states disabled by max_cstate should not disable the TSC Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-15 10:57 ` [PATCH] ACPI: idle: fix init-time TSC check regression Frans Pop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0905141750100.24833@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=janne.t.kulmala@tut.fi \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®