mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Janne Kulmala <janne.t.kulmala@tut.fi>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	johnstul@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: idle: fix init-time TSC check regression
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 00:27:14 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905150025030.3561@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905141750100.24833@localhost.localdomain>

On Thu, 14 May 2009, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> 
> A previous 2.6.30 patch, a71e4917dc0ebbcb5a0ecb7ca3486643c1c9a6e2,
> (ACPI: idle: mark_tsc_unstable() at init-time, not run-time)
> erroneously disabled the TSC on systems that did not actually
> have valid deep C-states.
> 
> Move the check after the deep-C-states are validated,
> via new helper, tsc_check_state(), hich replaces tsc_halts_in_c().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> ---
> Thomas,
> I decided to use a tsc-specific helper
> rather than piggyback on acpi_timer_check_state(),
> since that is not general, but rather LAPIC timer specific.
> (and I'll re-name that to reflect its specific function
>  in a cosmetic follow-up patch)

I have no strong opinion on that :)

> +		if (cx->valid)
> +			tsc_check_state(cx->type);
>  
>  		if (cx->valid)
>  			working++;

Could do with

      	 if (cx->valid) {
            	tsc_check_state(cx->type);
                working++;
      	 }

Otherwise Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-14 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-08  4:14 regression in TSC unstable? Steven Rostedt
2009-05-08  5:21 ` Len Brown
2009-05-08 12:07   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-11  0:26 ` Regression in TSC unstable -- confirmed Frans Pop
2009-05-11 14:22   ` [PATCH] ACPI: do not mark TSC unstable for invalid C-states Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-11 15:00     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-11 15:03     ` Frans Pop
2009-05-11 16:43     ` Janne Kulmala
2009-05-14 19:46       ` Len Brown
2009-05-14 20:09         ` Len Brown
2009-05-14 20:19           ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-14 21:55             ` [PATCH] ACPI: idle: fix init-time TSC check regression Len Brown
2009-05-14 22:27               ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2009-05-15  3:36                 ` Len Brown
2009-05-14 22:31               ` Frans Pop
2009-05-15  5:40               ` [PATCH] ACPI: Idle C-states disabled by max_cstate should not disable the TSC Len Brown
2009-05-15  6:18                 ` [PATCH] ACPI: idle: rename lapic timer workaround routines Len Brown
2009-05-15  8:28                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-15  8:27                 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Idle C-states disabled by max_cstate should not disable the TSC Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-15 10:57               ` [PATCH] ACPI: idle: fix init-time TSC check regression Frans Pop

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0905150025030.3561@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=janne.t.kulmala@tut.fi \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®