From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: security@kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Security] [PATCH] proc: avoid information leaks to non-privileged processes
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 08:35:35 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0905050833180.4983@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0905050755310.4983@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Note: the "pid + jiffies" is just meant to be a tiny tiny bit of noise. It
> has no real meaning. It could be anything. I just picked the previous
> seed, it's just that now we keep the state in between calls and that will
> feed into the next result, and that should make all the difference.
Actually, thinking about it, we could/should probably just remove that
tiny bit of noise.
After all, we get _real_ noise from the "keyptr->secret" thing. It's not
updated all the time, but it's certainly updated often enough that nobody
will ever see anything remotely guessable, I suspect.
Not that the "pid+jiffies" should hurt either, of course. It just doesn't
really look meaningful, and only exists as a historical oddity that
relates to the previous implementation of get_random_int().
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-05 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-04 18:51 Jake Edge
2009-05-04 19:00 ` [Security] " Linus Torvalds
2009-05-04 19:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-05-04 20:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-04 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-04 23:26 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-05-04 23:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-05 7:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-05 15:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-05 15:35 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-05-05 16:18 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-05 16:10 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-05 5:50 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-05 6:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-05 8:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-05 19:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-05 20:22 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-05 21:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-06 10:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 10:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 16:25 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-06 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-06 17:57 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-07 0:50 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-07 15:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 18:14 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-07 18:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 18:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 19:24 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-07 15:16 ` Florian Weimer
2009-05-07 16:55 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-07 17:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-07 18:42 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-06 20:09 ` [patch] random: make get_random_int() more random Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 20:41 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-06 20:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 21:10 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-06 21:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-14 22:47 ` Jake Edge
2009-05-14 22:55 ` [Security] " Linus Torvalds
2009-05-15 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-15 15:10 ` Jake Edge
2009-05-16 10:00 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-05-16 10:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-16 12:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-16 14:00 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-16 14:28 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-16 14:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-05-16 15:09 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-05-16 14:32 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-16 13:58 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-05-16 15:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-16 15:47 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-05-16 15:54 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-05-16 16:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-16 16:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-15 1:16 ` Américo Wang
2009-05-06 20:25 ` [Security] [PATCH] proc: avoid information leaks to non-privileged processes Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 20:52 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-05 8:58 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0905050833180.4983@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jake@lwn.net \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome