mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	niel.lambrechts@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Probe Timeouts with 47afbaf5af9454a7a1a64591e20cbfcc27ca67a8
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:14:42 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0905111157561.3586@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242067939.3873.45.camel@johannes.local>



On Mon, 11 May 2009, Johannes Berg wrote:
> 
> Curious really, since with that fix and a revert it would go to -1 dBm.
> The only explanation I have is that then the Intel card defaults to some
> safe value because it doesn't support values < 0.

Well, since I'm testing this laptop for any corner cases, the non-working 
case had actually been tested with things like multiple suspend-to-ram 
cycles (while doing accelerated 3D and sound at the same time), along with 
testing anything else I could think of. And everything worked, but 
wireless wouldn't associate.

Reverting and rebooting, and it worked. But then when I wanted to 
double-check (sadly _after_ having already sent out the complaint), I 
now cannot get it to not work even without the revert.

And I've re-done all the STR testing, and that isn't the cause of it.

Oh well.

I don't actually tend to _use_ that laptop, it gets dug out for release 
and distro testing and for some very occasional travel.  I've not had 
issues with wireless on that thing before (apart from any normal iwl 
issues), but maybe it just happened to take a really really long time to 
associate that one time.

				Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-11 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-01  1:38 Parag Warudkar
2009-05-01  8:16 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-01 13:19   ` Parag Warudkar
2009-05-11 17:57     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-11 18:10       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-11 18:22       ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-11 18:33         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-11 18:52           ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-11 19:14             ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-05-11 20:21               ` Frans Pop
2009-05-01 20:28   ` Parag Warudkar
2009-05-02  8:27     ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-02 11:20       ` Parag Warudkar
2009-05-02 16:44         ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-02 18:13           ` Parag Warudkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0905111157561.3586@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=niel.lambrechts@gmail.com \
    --cc=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome