* [PATCH iwl-next v4] e100: prevent shift-out-of-bounds in EEPROM access
@ 2026-08-20 9:40 pavankumaryalagada
2026-08-24 9:18 ` Yalagada Pavan Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: pavankumaryalagada @ 2026-08-20 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel
Cc: intel-wired-lan, Andrew Lunn, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, netdev, linux-kernel, skhan,
syzbot+e0abb1d45ac291ebebeb, kohei, aleksandr.loktionov,
Yalagada Pavan Kumar
From: Yalagada Pavan Kumar <pavankumaryalagada@gmail.com>
When reading the EEPROM address length, e100_eeprom_read() can return
an invalid length. This value is then used as a shift count when
calculating eeprom_wc, resulting in a shift-out-of-bounds UBSAN warning.
Stop EEPROM address probing if the detected address length exceeds
the initial address length to prevent addr_len from underflowing.
Validate addr_len after reading it from the EEPROM in both
e100_eeprom_load() and e100_eeprom_save(), and return -EIO
if the value is zero or greater than 8.
Reported-by: syzbot+e0abb1d45ac291ebebeb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e0abb1d45ac291ebebeb
Signed-off-by: Yalagada Pavan Kumar <pavankumaryalagada@gmail.com>
---
v4:
- Squash the v1-v3 changes into a single standalone patch.
- Prevent addr_len underflow during EEPROM probing.
- Validate addr_len in e100_eeprom_load() and e100_eeprom_save().
- Use BIT() and cast the result to u16 for eeprom_wc.
- Target iwl-next as requested by Tony Nguyen.
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260816113754.22900-1-pavankumaryalagada@gmail.com/T/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260810083355.21631-1-pavankumaryalagada@gmail.com/T/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260807145626.52692-1-pavankumaryalagada@gmail.com/T/
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
index 29960762e64a..cd8190386652 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
@@ -744,7 +744,14 @@ static __le16 e100_eeprom_read(struct nic *nic, u16 *addr_len, u16 addr)
* complete address. Use this to adjust addr_len. */
ctrl = ioread8(&nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
if (!(ctrl & eedo) && i > 16) {
- *addr_len -= (i - 16);
+ u16 len = i - 16;
+
+ if (len > *addr_len) {
+ *addr_len = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ *addr_len -= len;
i = 17;
}
@@ -765,7 +772,15 @@ static int e100_eeprom_load(struct nic *nic)
/* Try reading with an 8-bit addr len to discover actual addr len */
e100_eeprom_read(nic, &addr_len, 0);
- nic->eeprom_wc = 1 << addr_len;
+
+ if (!addr_len || addr_len > 8) {
+ netif_err(nic, probe, nic->netdev,
+ "Invalid EEPROM address length %u\n",
+ addr_len);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ nic->eeprom_wc = (u16)BIT(addr_len);
for (addr = 0; addr < nic->eeprom_wc; addr++) {
nic->eeprom[addr] = e100_eeprom_read(nic, &addr_len, addr);
@@ -791,7 +806,15 @@ static int e100_eeprom_save(struct nic *nic, u16 start, u16 count)
/* Try reading with an 8-bit addr len to discover actual addr len */
e100_eeprom_read(nic, &addr_len, 0);
- nic->eeprom_wc = 1 << addr_len;
+
+ if (!addr_len || addr_len > 8) {
+ netif_err(nic, probe, nic->netdev,
+ "Invalid EEPROM address length %u\n",
+ addr_len);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ nic->eeprom_wc = (u16)BIT(addr_len);
if (start + count >= nic->eeprom_wc)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH iwl-next v4] e100: prevent shift-out-of-bounds in EEPROM access
2026-08-20 9:40 [PATCH iwl-next v4] e100: prevent shift-out-of-bounds in EEPROM access pavankumaryalagada
@ 2026-08-24 9:18 ` Yalagada Pavan Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yalagada Pavan Kumar @ 2026-08-24 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel
Cc: intel-wired-lan, Andrew Lunn, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, netdev, linux-kernel, skhan,
syzbot+e0abb1d45ac291ebebeb, kohei, aleksandr.loktionov
Hi Tony,
I send this patch as single standalone patch with all the changes from the previous
versions and targeted it to iwl-next as requested.
Could you please take a look when you get a chance and let me know if any further
changes are needed?
Thanks,
Pavan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-24 9:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-20 9:40 [PATCH iwl-next v4] e100: prevent shift-out-of-bounds in EEPROM access pavankumaryalagada
2026-08-24 9:18 ` Yalagada Pavan Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®