mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 11:50:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ap6I55W7x_p0I1FE@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83b58943-f2ff-4bc5-84b7-a40f03d3c3bd@amd.com>

On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 03:10:00PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
...
> >> @@ -9043,27 +9049,31 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
> >>  
> >>  		if (!has_idle_core && cpus_share_cache(prev, target)) {
> >>  			i = select_idle_smt(p, sd, prev);
> >> -			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> >> -				return i;
> >> +			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
> >> +				target = i;
> >> +				goto out;
> >> +			}
> >>  		}
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >>  	i = select_idle_cpu(p, sd, has_idle_core, target);
> >>  	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> >> -		return i;
> >> -
> >> +		target = i;
> > 
> > Not sure about this final fallback. Is it worth doing an additional
> > select_idle_smt_priority() after idle scan failed or stopped because the
> > SIS_UTIL scan budget was exhausted?
> 
> I see what you mean! We'll end up doing a:
> 
>   select_idle_smt_priority(p, target)
> 
> at the end which might indeed be wasteful.

Exactly.

> > 
> > It seems better to jump to out only when one of these paths has actually
> > selected a candidate:
> > 
> > 	i = select_idle_cpu(p, sd, has_idle_core, target);
> > 	if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
> > 		target = i;
> > 		goto out;
> > 	}
> > 
> > The prev_aff and recent_used_cpu fallbacks can jump to "out" as well, since they
> > were already verified as suitable candidates. If none of those paths succeeds, I
> > think the existing final "return target" should remain unchanged.
> > 
> > Does that make sense?
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong but you are suggesting to keep the current
> return intact and put out label after it like:
> 
>     /* If no suitable target was found */
>     return target;
> 
> out:
>    if (!sched_smt_asym_active())
>        return target;
> 
>    return select_idle_smt_priority(p, target);
> ---
> 
> That makes sense to me!

Correct, I'm going to run some tests with this and will send a v3 later.

Thanks!
-Andrea

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04  9:18 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-04  9:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-09-04  9:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-07  3:57   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-07  9:11     ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-07  9:40       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-07  9:50         ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-09-07 16:48     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-09-08  5:37   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-09-08  6:12     ` Andrea Righi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-09  6:26 [PATCH v5 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-09  6:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-11 14:11   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-08  8:23 [PATCH v4 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-08  8:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-08 19:40   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-08 20:49     ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09  6:32       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-09 14:42   ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-09 15:18     ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 15:42       ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-09 16:22         ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-07 16:30 [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-07 16:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-08-31 18:10 [PATCH 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-08-31 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-03 10:59   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-04  5:59     ` Andrea Righi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ap6I55W7x_p0I1FE@gpd4 \
    --to=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®