From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 01:10:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce287aa0-0079-4cfd-b330-6b7617f49e8a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908082345.103087-3-arighi@nvidia.com>
Hello Andrea,
On 9/8/2026 1:53 PM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> @@ -9747,8 +9796,10 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flags)
> }
>
> /* Slow path */
> - if (unlikely(sd))
> - return sched_balance_find_dst_cpu(sd, p, cpu, prev_cpu, sd_flag);
> + if (unlikely(sd)) {
> + new_cpu = sched_balance_find_dst_cpu(sd, p, cpu, prev_cpu, sd_flag);
> + return select_idle_smt_cpu(p, new_cpu);
nit. I personally feel this can be better integrated into the
sched_balance_find_dst_cpu(). Something like the following:
(Only build tested)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b8bd308c2d5b..1012dfb33f08 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12353,6 +12353,17 @@ static inline void update_sg_wakeup_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
}
+ /*
+ * If we are on a SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_ASYM_PACKING
+ * domain, use the group_asym_packing classification to
+ * decide placement based on rankings of idle siblings.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(sched_smt_asym_active() &&
+ (sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY) &&
+ (sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING) &&
+ sgs->idle_cpus))
+ sgs->group_asym_packing = 1;
+
sgs->group_capacity = group->sgc->capacity;
sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight;
@@ -12393,9 +12404,15 @@ static bool update_pick_idlest(struct sched_group *idlest,
return false;
break;
+ case group_asym_packing:
+ /*
+ * Only possible for sched_smt_asym_active().
+ * Select the idle SMT that is more preferred.
+ */
+ return sched_asym_prefer(idlest->asym_prefer_cpu,
+ group->asym_prefer_cpu);
case group_llc_balance:
case group_imbalanced:
- case group_asym_packing:
case group_smt_balance:
/* Those types are not used in the slow wakeup path */
return false;
---
It leads to slightly more branches but they are super predictable when
iterating at a particular sched_domain level so the overhead should be
negligible.
I don't have any strong feelings either ways. Thoughts?
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 8:23 [PATCH v4 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-08 8:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-09-08 20:09 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-08 20:57 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-08 8:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-08 19:40 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-09-08 20:49 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 6:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-09 14:42 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-09 15:18 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 15:42 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-09 16:22 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 7:20 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-09 7:26 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 12:39 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-11 13:53 ` Dietmar Eggemann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-09 6:26 [PATCH v5 " Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 6:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-11 14:11 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-07 16:30 [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-07 16:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-04 9:18 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-04 9:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-07 3:57 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-07 9:11 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-07 9:40 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-07 9:50 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-07 16:48 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-09-08 5:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-09-08 6:12 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-31 18:10 [PATCH 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-08-31 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-03 10:59 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-04 5:59 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce287aa0-0079-4cfd-b330-6b7617f49e8a@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®