From: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/18] iommu/vt-d: Restore IOMMU state and reclaimed domain ids
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 18:47:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apCC3xMkYkEyQRID@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f8963c4-f6b1-44b3-ab2c-ed658822efb4@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 03:22:26PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
>On 8/8/26 10:27, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
>>During boot fetch the preserved state of IOMMU unit and if found then
>>restore the state.
>>
>>- Reuse the root_table that was preserved in the previous kernel.
>>- Reclaim the domain ids of the preserved domains for each preserved
>> devices so these are not acquired by another domain.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
>>---
>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++------------
>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 7 ++
>> drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
[snip]
>>+
>>+static int _restore_used_domain_ids(struct iommu_device_ser *ser, void *arg)
>>+{
>>+ int id = ser->domain_iommu_ser.attachment_id;
>>+ struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_hw_ser;
>>+ struct intel_iommu *iommu = arg;
>>+
>>+ if (WARN_ON(!ser->domain_iommu_ser.iommu_phys))
>>+ return 0;
>>+
>>+ iommu_hw_ser = phys_to_virt(ser->domain_iommu_ser.iommu_phys);
>>+ if (iommu_hw_ser->type != IOMMU_INTEL)
>>+ return 0;
>>+
>>+ /* Only allocate domain ID from associated IOMMU HW unit */
>>+ if (iommu_hw_ser->intel.phys_addr != iommu->reg_phys)
>>+ return 0;
>>+
>>+ /*
>>+ * This can fail as multiple preserved devices can share the same domain
>>+ * ID. Since this is done during DMAR init so these failures can be
>>+ * ignored.
>>+ */
>>+ ida_alloc_range(&iommu->domain_ida, id, id, GFP_ATOMIC);
>
>This mixes two different cases:
>
>- another preserved device has already reserved the same DID.
>- the DID is not reserved because ida_alloc_range() failed (for example,
> memory allocation failure).
>
>Case #1 is expected. Case #2 must not be ignored, because it means
>restore failed. So this should probably be something like (not tested):
>
> mutex_lock(&iommu->did_lock);
> if (ida_find_first_range(&iommu->domain_ida, id, id) >= 0)
> BUG_ON(ida_alloc_range(&iommu->domain_ida, id, id, GFP_KERNEL) < 0)
> mutex_unlock(&iommu->did_lock);
This is a good point, I will update this. Actually, I was thinking of
adding a new struct in the preserved state that represents the
association between domain-iommu-device. All the drivers have this, so
it is better to have a representation of this. Let me evaluate that.
>
>?
>
>By the way, why GFP_ATOMIC here at all?
Will update as you suggested.
>
>>+ return 0;
>>+}
>>+
>>+/**
>>+ * intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table() - Restore root table and reclaim domain IDs
>>+ * @iommu: Target IOMMU
>>+ * @iommu_ser: Serialized IOMMU hardware state from previous kernel
>>+ *
>>+ * Restores the preserved root table and context tables for the IOMMU hardware
>>+ * instance across Live Update, and reclaims all domain IDs previously allocated
>>+ * to preserved devices so they are not reused.
>>+ */
>>+void intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>>+ struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser)
>>+{
>>+ if (!iommu_ser->intel.restored)
>>+ iommu_restore_pages(iommu_ser->intel.root_table);
>>+
>>+ iommu->root_entry = __va(iommu_ser->intel.root_table);
>>+
>>+ if (!iommu_ser->intel.restored)
>>+ restore_iommu_context(iommu);
>>+
>>+ iommu_ser->intel.restored = 1;
>
>This uses iommu_ser->intel.restored to prevent restoring the root and
>context tables multiple times. For this to work safely, iommu_ser-
>>intel.restored must be 0 the first time restore runs after kexec.
>
>The problem is: this field is inside struct iommu_hw_ser, and that
>struct is allocated in the old kernel. How to ensure that the previous
>kernel has zeroed this out? Maybe I’m overthinking this.
This is a valid point. However, the old kernel allocates this struct
with GFP_ZERO and it never touches the restored field prior to kexec.
So it should be zero in the new kernel.
>
>>+ BUG_ON(iommu_for_each_preserved_device(_restore_used_domain_ids, iommu));
>>+}
>>+
>> /**
>> * intel_iommu_preserve_device() - Intel IOMMU callback to preserve device state
>> * @dev: Target device
>
>Thanks,
>baolu
Thanks,
Sami
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 2:27 [PATCH v4 00/18] iommu: Add live update state preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] memfd: export memfd_get_seals() Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] iommu: Implement IOMMU Live update FLB callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] iommu/pages: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve/restore iommu pages Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] iommupt: Implement preserve/unpreserve/restore callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] iommu: Implement IOMMU domain preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] iommu: Implement device and IOMMU HW preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] iommu/vt-d: Implement device and iommu preserve/unpreserve ops Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-26 7:10 ` Baolu Lu
2026-08-26 20:46 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] iommu/vt-d: Clear unpreserved context entries during shutdown Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-26 8:05 ` Baolu Lu
2026-08-26 12:30 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-26 20:37 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-26 20:30 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-27 6:09 ` Baolu Lu
2026-08-27 18:57 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] iommu: Add APIs to get iommu and device preserved state Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-12 6:29 ` Ankit Soni
2026-08-12 23:23 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] iommu/vt-d: Restore IOMMU state and reclaimed domain ids Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-27 7:22 ` Baolu Lu
2026-08-27 18:47 ` Samiullah Khawaja [this message]
2026-08-28 1:36 ` Baolu Lu
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] iommu: Restore and reattach preserved domains to devices Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-14 16:59 ` Ankit Soni
2026-08-14 19:46 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-17 15:32 ` Ankit Soni
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] iommu/vt-d: Handle reattach of the restored domain Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-27 8:12 ` Baolu Lu
2026-08-27 17:52 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-28 1:42 ` Baolu Lu
2026-08-28 1:55 ` Baolu Lu
2026-08-28 14:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-28 16:15 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] iommu/vt-d: Preserve PASID table of preserved device Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] iommufd: Implement ioctl to mark HWPT for preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] iommufd: Persist iommu hardware pagetables for live update Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] iommufd: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve a vfio cdev Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] vfio/pci: Preserve the iommufd state of the " Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-08 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] iommufd/selftest: Add test to verify iommufd preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-26 8:12 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] iommu: Add live update state preservation David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apCC3xMkYkEyQRID@google.com \
--to=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®